Attitude of Healthcare Professionals and Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease Towards Home Hemodialysis: A Survey in China

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Hemodialysis International Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1111/hdi.13197
Junqing Liang, Ying Wang, Hongjie Yang, Yongju Jin, Li Zuo
{"title":"Attitude of Healthcare Professionals and Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease Towards Home Hemodialysis: A Survey in China","authors":"Junqing Liang,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Hongjie Yang,&nbsp;Yongju Jin,&nbsp;Li Zuo","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Home hemodialysis is still in its early stages in mainland China. This survey aimed to assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients towards home hemodialysis and to identify the barriers hindering its uptake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional observational survey was conducted using convenience sampling. Healthcare professionals specializing in nephrology and patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) across mainland China were included. A self-reported questionnaire was administered to gather data on participants' demographics, attitudes, perceived barriers, and facilitating factors related to home hemodialysis. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the association between categorical variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>A significant majority (80.1%) of healthcare professionals recognized the need for home hemodialysis. However, there was a statistically significant difference in willingness to undertake or receive home hemodialysis between healthcare professionals (53.6%) and patients (63.2%), respectively. Healthcare professionals identified the following as top facilitating factors: patients' needs (6.9 points), higher patient benefits (5.7 points), and shortage of dialysis resources (5.1 points). The primary barriers cited were the absence of relevant policies and regulations (7.5 points), lack of guidelines and management standards (7.0 points), and inadequate treatment technology and knowledge (6.6 points). Patients' willingness to accept home hemodialysis was primarily driven by the potential to save time and travel expenses (70.7%) and reduce infection risk (49.0%). The main barriers identified by patients were the inability to manage acute complications (77.8%), increased risk of vascular access infection (66.1%), and uncertainty about self-cannulation (60.7%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is a clear demand for home hemodialysis in China among both healthcare professionals and patients with ESKD. However, the lack of a supportive system, including policies, standards, and management frameworks, remains a significant obstacle to its widespread adoption.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12815,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis International","volume":"29 3","pages":"284-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hdi.13197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Home hemodialysis is still in its early stages in mainland China. This survey aimed to assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients towards home hemodialysis and to identify the barriers hindering its uptake.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational survey was conducted using convenience sampling. Healthcare professionals specializing in nephrology and patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) across mainland China were included. A self-reported questionnaire was administered to gather data on participants' demographics, attitudes, perceived barriers, and facilitating factors related to home hemodialysis. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the association between categorical variables.

Findings

A significant majority (80.1%) of healthcare professionals recognized the need for home hemodialysis. However, there was a statistically significant difference in willingness to undertake or receive home hemodialysis between healthcare professionals (53.6%) and patients (63.2%), respectively. Healthcare professionals identified the following as top facilitating factors: patients' needs (6.9 points), higher patient benefits (5.7 points), and shortage of dialysis resources (5.1 points). The primary barriers cited were the absence of relevant policies and regulations (7.5 points), lack of guidelines and management standards (7.0 points), and inadequate treatment technology and knowledge (6.6 points). Patients' willingness to accept home hemodialysis was primarily driven by the potential to save time and travel expenses (70.7%) and reduce infection risk (49.0%). The main barriers identified by patients were the inability to manage acute complications (77.8%), increased risk of vascular access infection (66.1%), and uncertainty about self-cannulation (60.7%).

Conclusion

There is a clear demand for home hemodialysis in China among both healthcare professionals and patients with ESKD. However, the lack of a supportive system, including policies, standards, and management frameworks, remains a significant obstacle to its widespread adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员和终末期肾病患者对家庭血液透析的态度:中国调查。
导读:家庭血液透析在中国大陆仍处于起步阶段。本调查旨在评估医疗保健专业人员和患者对家庭血液透析的看法,并确定阻碍其吸收的障碍。方法:采用方便抽样的横断面观察调查方法。研究对象包括中国大陆的肾病专业医护人员和终末期肾病(ESKD)患者。通过自我报告问卷收集参与者的人口统计数据、态度、感知障碍以及与家庭血液透析相关的促进因素。使用卡方检验分析分类变量之间的相关性。结果:绝大多数(80.1%)的卫生保健专业人员认识到家庭血液透析的必要性。然而,医疗保健专业人员(53.6%)和患者(63.2%)在进行或接受家庭血液透析的意愿方面存在统计学差异。医疗保健专业人员确定了以下最重要的促进因素:患者需求(6.9分)、更高的患者福利(5.7分)和透析资源短缺(5.1分)。主要障碍依次为:缺乏相关政策法规(7.5分)、缺乏指导方针和管理标准(7.0分)、缺乏治疗技术和知识(6.6分)。患者愿意接受家庭血液透析的主要原因是节省时间和差旅费(70.7%)和降低感染风险(49.0%)。患者确定的主要障碍是无法控制急性并发症(77.8%)、血管通路感染风险增加(66.1%)和自我插管不确定(60.7%)。结论:中国的医护人员和ESKD患者对家庭血液透析有明显的需求。然而,缺乏支持系统,包括政策、标准和管理框架,仍然是其广泛采用的重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hemodialysis International
Hemodialysis International UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hemodialysis International was originally an annual publication containing the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hemodialysis held in conjunction with the Annual Dialysis Conference. Since 2003, Hemodialysis International is published quarterly and contains original papers on clinical and experimental topics related to dialysis in addition to the Annual Dialysis Conference supplement. This journal is a must-have for nephrologists, nurses, and technicians worldwide. Quarterly issues of Hemodialysis International are included with your membership to the International Society for Hemodialysis. The journal contains original articles, review articles, and commentary to keep readers completely updated in the field of hemodialysis. Edited by international and multidisciplinary experts, Hemodialysis International disseminates critical information in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Safety and Efficacy of Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa for Chronic Kidney Disease–Related Anemia in Patients Receiving Dialysis by Baseline Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Dose Determination of Compassion Fatigue and Brain Fog Levels and Associated Factors Among Hemodialysis Unit Professionals: A Descriptive and Analytical Study Patients' Perspectives and Experiences of Cannabinoids to Manage Symptoms of Chronic Kidney Disease: An In-Depth Interview Study Water Distribution Systems for Hemodialysis: Design and Materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1