David Oliver: What functions should remain within NHS central government agencies?

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r630
David Oliver
{"title":"David Oliver: What functions should remain within NHS central government agencies?","authors":"David Oliver","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest major reorganisation of the NHS’s government departments and central agencies1 begs the hypothetical question of which functions can best or only be served by central bodies operating at national level. Hypothetical or not, I do have to give the question some empirical constraints. First, data from the British Social Attitudes survey2 and other big datasets such as the Health Foundation/Ipsos rolling polls3 on public perceptions of the NHS show little support for a wholesale shift away from a tax funded, universal, free-at-point-of-care health service and continuing support for the NHS’s founding principles, even though public satisfaction with the current service is at a record low.4 Second, even within universal healthcare systems in high income nations with publicly funded services rather than insurance or copayment models, the NHS is arguably the industrialised world’s most centralised.56 Several others have more devolution of power and accountability to regional administration, …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest major reorganisation of the NHS’s government departments and central agencies1 begs the hypothetical question of which functions can best or only be served by central bodies operating at national level. Hypothetical or not, I do have to give the question some empirical constraints. First, data from the British Social Attitudes survey2 and other big datasets such as the Health Foundation/Ipsos rolling polls3 on public perceptions of the NHS show little support for a wholesale shift away from a tax funded, universal, free-at-point-of-care health service and continuing support for the NHS’s founding principles, even though public satisfaction with the current service is at a record low.4 Second, even within universal healthcare systems in high income nations with publicly funded services rather than insurance or copayment models, the NHS is arguably the industrialised world’s most centralised.56 Several others have more devolution of power and accountability to regional administration, …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大卫-奥利弗哪些职能应保留在国家医疗服务体系中央政府机构内?
最近对国民保健服务政府部门和中央机构的重大重组提出了一个假设问题,即哪些职能可以最好地或只能由在国家一级运作的中央机构来服务。不管是不是假设的,我必须给这个问题一些经验约束。首先,来自英国社会态度调查和其他大数据集的数据,如健康基金会/益普索关于公众对国民保健服务的看法的滚动民意调查显示,尽管公众对目前服务的满意度处于历史最低水平,但很少有人支持从税收资助的、普遍的、免费的医疗服务大规模转变,并继续支持国民保健服务的基本原则其次,即使在高收入国家的全民医疗保健系统中,公共资助的服务而不是保险或共同支付模式,NHS可以说是工业化世界中最集中的其他几个国家将权力和责任更多地下放给地方政府,……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple password frustration: can the NHS solve its logging-in problem? Effects of lifestyle interventions in pregnancy on gestational diabetes: individual participant data and network meta-analysis. Ovarian cancer: Age based blood test thresholds proposed to improve diagnosis. Oral ivermectin versus 5% permethrin cream to treat children and adults with classic scabies: multicentre, assessor blinded, cluster randomised clinical trial. NHS "online hospital": Menopause, prostate, and eye conditions to be prioritised.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1