Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics Letters Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112300
Franziska Lesigang , Christian Hilbe , Nikoleta E. Glynatsi
{"title":"Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games","authors":"Franziska Lesigang ,&nbsp;Christian Hilbe ,&nbsp;Nikoleta E. Glynatsi","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we study best responses in repeated additive games among two players. A stage game is additive if each player’s payoff is the sum of two components, and each component only depends on the action of a single player. We suppose one player’s strategy depends on the co-player’s last <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span> actions. Then we prove that the other player has a best response that only depends on their own <span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span> actions. That is, for an important sub-class of games and strategies, players can achieve maximum payoffs even with less memory than their opponent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 112300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525001375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study best responses in repeated additive games among two players. A stage game is additive if each player’s payoff is the sum of two components, and each component only depends on the action of a single player. We suppose one player’s strategy depends on the co-player’s last n actions. Then we prove that the other player has a best response that only depends on their own n1 actions. That is, for an important sub-class of games and strategies, players can achieve maximum payoffs even with less memory than their opponent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我能记得比你少吗?重复加性博弈中的最佳对策
本文研究的是双人重复加法博弈中的最佳对策。如果每个玩家的报酬是两个部分之和,而每个部分只取决于一个玩家的行动,那么这个阶段的博弈就是加法博弈。我们假设一名棋手的策略取决于另一名棋手的最后 n 次行动。那么我们就可以证明,另一名玩家的最佳对策只取决于自己的 n-1 次行动。也就是说,对于一个重要的游戏和策略子类来说,即使玩家的记忆力比对手少,也能获得最大回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
期刊最新文献
Hysteresis through learning by doing: Estimating endogenous productivity Measuring the headwinds to Black self-employment Robust human capital investment Yielding to relevance: How treasury yields impact accounting relevance Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1