“Less is more”: How effective is the joint effect on CCTV crime reduction?

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2025.105928
Ruidun Chen , Silas Nogueira de Melo , Minxuan Lan , Yuchen Li , Shanhe Jiang , Yanqing Xu
{"title":"“Less is more”: How effective is the joint effect on CCTV crime reduction?","authors":"Ruidun Chen ,&nbsp;Silas Nogueira de Melo ,&nbsp;Minxuan Lan ,&nbsp;Yuchen Li ,&nbsp;Shanhe Jiang ,&nbsp;Yanqing Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of overlapping surveillance areas from multiple closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, known as the “CCTV joint effect,” and its impact on crime reduction may provide valuable insights for crime prevention research and practice. Nonetheless, extant studies fail to provide evidence comparing crime reduction between CCTVs with and without joint effects when installed in a similar environment. This study gap has posed challenges for the assessment and installation of CCTVs. In response to these concerns, we conducted a comparative study utilizing data from 603 partnering businesses that installed CCTVs provided by the “Green Light Project” in Detroit. Employing the weighted displacement difference algorithm, we examined differences in the reduction effect on crime between CCTVs with and without joint effects. The results indicate that the joint effect does not consistently demonstrate a positive impact on the reduction effect of CCTVs. Its impact depends on the number of additional CCTVs, the effective radius, and the crime category. Meanwhile, our findings suggest that the joint effects are more likely to enhance the reduction effect on property crime. If one expects to enhance the reduction effect on violent crimes or the total volume of crime, careful planning of the number and layout of additional CCTVs is necessary. These insights are crucial for optimizing the layout of CCTVs, strengthening crime prevention, and reducing privacy concerns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105928"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of overlapping surveillance areas from multiple closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, known as the “CCTV joint effect,” and its impact on crime reduction may provide valuable insights for crime prevention research and practice. Nonetheless, extant studies fail to provide evidence comparing crime reduction between CCTVs with and without joint effects when installed in a similar environment. This study gap has posed challenges for the assessment and installation of CCTVs. In response to these concerns, we conducted a comparative study utilizing data from 603 partnering businesses that installed CCTVs provided by the “Green Light Project” in Detroit. Employing the weighted displacement difference algorithm, we examined differences in the reduction effect on crime between CCTVs with and without joint effects. The results indicate that the joint effect does not consistently demonstrate a positive impact on the reduction effect of CCTVs. Its impact depends on the number of additional CCTVs, the effective radius, and the crime category. Meanwhile, our findings suggest that the joint effects are more likely to enhance the reduction effect on property crime. If one expects to enhance the reduction effect on violent crimes or the total volume of crime, careful planning of the number and layout of additional CCTVs is necessary. These insights are crucial for optimizing the layout of CCTVs, strengthening crime prevention, and reducing privacy concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“少即是多”:CCTV减少犯罪的合力效果如何?
多个闭路电视(CCTV)摄像机重叠监视区域的概念,被称为“CCTV联合效应”,及其对减少犯罪的影响,可能为预防犯罪的研究和实践提供有价值的见解。然而,现有的研究未能提供证据来比较在类似的环境中安装有和没有联合效应的闭路电视减少犯罪的情况。这一研究差距给cctv的评估和安装带来了挑战。为了回应这些担忧,我们利用603家合作企业的数据进行了一项比较研究,这些企业安装了由底特律“绿灯项目”提供的闭路电视。采用加权位移差分算法,研究了有无联合效应的闭路电视对犯罪减少效果的差异。结果表明,联合效应并不总是对cctv的减排效果产生积极影响。其效果取决于新增闭路电视的数量、有效半径和犯罪种类。同时,我们的研究结果表明,联合效应更有可能增强财产犯罪的减少效果。如果想要提高暴力犯罪或犯罪总量的减少效果,就必须仔细规划增设cctv的数量和布局。这些见解对于优化cctv布局、加强犯罪预防和减少隐私问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Understanding floodplain development: An analysis of demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with floodplain development in the Kansas City metropolitan area of the US Unveiling the dynamics: Tracing rural settlements evolution in urban-rural transition zones Mapping environmental determinants of aging in place through network analysis: insights from Taipei Path dependency and creative convergence: A comparative study of cultural and creative cities in Europe Foreign city users and in-store versus online retail channel choice: Urban logistics and planning implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1