Risk-incentive trade-off in moral hazard with risk management: Theoretical analysis and empirical verification

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107083
Zheng Dou , Chong Lai
{"title":"Risk-incentive trade-off in moral hazard with risk management: Theoretical analysis and empirical verification","authors":"Zheng Dou ,&nbsp;Chong Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study incorporates risk management into a continuous-time principal–agent model based on moral hazard, analyzing how risk and incentives interact when preferences are risk-sensitive. We focus on how principal adjust compensation, comprising performance pay, risk penalties, and basic salaries, to incentivize agents under hidden information. Our findings confirm the classic negative trade-off between risk and incentives, alongside a novel positive relationship between risk and risk–penalty sensitivity. In high-risk environments, the principal frequently seeks out more skilled agents and offer them greater incentives, thus disrupting the relationship between risk and compensation sensitivities. Our empirical analysis underscores the significance of adaptive compensation strategies in improving agent behavior in the face of escalating risks, supporting these theoretical predictions. These insights underline the potential for refining incentive structures to better align with varying levels of firm risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 107083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325000781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study incorporates risk management into a continuous-time principal–agent model based on moral hazard, analyzing how risk and incentives interact when preferences are risk-sensitive. We focus on how principal adjust compensation, comprising performance pay, risk penalties, and basic salaries, to incentivize agents under hidden information. Our findings confirm the classic negative trade-off between risk and incentives, alongside a novel positive relationship between risk and risk–penalty sensitivity. In high-risk environments, the principal frequently seeks out more skilled agents and offer them greater incentives, thus disrupting the relationship between risk and compensation sensitivities. Our empirical analysis underscores the significance of adaptive compensation strategies in improving agent behavior in the face of escalating risks, supporting these theoretical predictions. These insights underline the potential for refining incentive structures to better align with varying levels of firm risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险管理下道德风险的风险激励权衡:理论分析与实证验证
本研究将风险管理纳入基于道德风险的连续时间委托-代理模型,分析当偏好对风险敏感时,风险和激励如何相互作用。我们重点研究了委托人如何调整报酬,包括绩效工资、风险惩罚和基本工资,以激励隐藏信息下的代理人。我们的研究结果证实了风险与激励之间的典型负权衡关系,以及风险与风险惩罚敏感性之间的新型正相关关系。在高风险环境中,委托人经常会寻找技能更高的代理人,并为他们提供更大的激励,从而破坏了风险与报酬敏感性之间的关系。我们的实证分析强调了适应性补偿策略在面对风险升级时改善代理人行为的重要性,支持了这些理论预测。这些见解强调了完善激励结构的潜力,以更好地适应不同水平的公司风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Local government debt and shadow banking of non-financial enterprises: Evidence from China Rule-based profit taxation in dynamic Cournot oligopoly: Transmission, stability and welfare Editorial Board Environmental regulation and compensation distribution within enterprises:Evidence from China Greening through credit: Green credit and polluting firm dynamics in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1