Detecting cognitive impairment in cerebrovascular disease using gait, dual tasks, and machine learning.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-02979-9
Vânia Guimarães, Inês Sousa, Miguel Velhote Correia
{"title":"Detecting cognitive impairment in cerebrovascular disease using gait, dual tasks, and machine learning.","authors":"Vânia Guimarães, Inês Sousa, Miguel Velhote Correia","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02979-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common after a stroke, but it can often go undetected. In this study, we investigated whether using gait and dual tasks could help detect cognitive impairment after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed gait and neuropsychological data from 47 participants who were part of the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative. Based on neuropsychological criteria, participants were categorized as impaired (n = 29) or cognitively normal (n = 18). Nested cross-validation was used for model training, hyperparameter tuning, and evaluation. Grid search with cross-validation was used to optimize the hyperparameters of a set of feature selectors and classifiers. Different gait tests were assessed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best classification performance was achieved using a comprehensive set of gait metrics, measured by the electronic walkway, that included dual-task costs while performing subtractions by ones. Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM), we could achieve a sensitivity of 96.6%, and a specificity of 61.1%. An optimized threshold of 27 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) revealed lower classification performance than the gait metrics, although differences in classification results were not significant. Combining the classifications provided by MoCA with those provided by gait metrics in a majority voting approach resulted in a higher specificity of 72.2%, and a high sensitivity of 93.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that gait analysis can be a useful tool for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with cerebrovascular disease, serving as a suitable alternative or complement to MoCA in the screening for cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02979-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common after a stroke, but it can often go undetected. In this study, we investigated whether using gait and dual tasks could help detect cognitive impairment after stroke.

Methods: We analyzed gait and neuropsychological data from 47 participants who were part of the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative. Based on neuropsychological criteria, participants were categorized as impaired (n = 29) or cognitively normal (n = 18). Nested cross-validation was used for model training, hyperparameter tuning, and evaluation. Grid search with cross-validation was used to optimize the hyperparameters of a set of feature selectors and classifiers. Different gait tests were assessed separately.

Results: The best classification performance was achieved using a comprehensive set of gait metrics, measured by the electronic walkway, that included dual-task costs while performing subtractions by ones. Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM), we could achieve a sensitivity of 96.6%, and a specificity of 61.1%. An optimized threshold of 27 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) revealed lower classification performance than the gait metrics, although differences in classification results were not significant. Combining the classifications provided by MoCA with those provided by gait metrics in a majority voting approach resulted in a higher specificity of 72.2%, and a high sensitivity of 93.1%.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that gait analysis can be a useful tool for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with cerebrovascular disease, serving as a suitable alternative or complement to MoCA in the screening for cognitive impairment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用步态、双重任务和机器学习检测脑血管疾病的认知障碍。
背景:中风后的认知障碍很常见,但往往不被发现。在这项研究中,我们研究了步态和双重任务是否有助于检测中风后的认知障碍。方法:我们分析了来自安大略省神经退行性疾病研究计划的47名参与者的步态和神经心理学数据。根据神经心理学标准,参与者被分为认知障碍组(n = 29)和认知正常组(n = 18)。嵌套交叉验证用于模型训练、超参数调优和评估。采用交叉验证的网格搜索对一组特征选择器和分类器的超参数进行优化。不同的步态测试分别进行评估。结果:使用一套全面的步态指标实现了最佳分类性能,由电子步道测量,包括双任务成本,同时执行减法。使用支持向量机(SVM),我们可以达到96.6%的灵敏度和61.1%的特异性。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)中27的优化阈值显示分类性能低于步态指标,尽管分类结果差异不显著。将MoCA提供的分类与多数投票方法中步态指标提供的分类相结合,特异性为72.2%,灵敏度为93.1%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,步态分析可以成为检测脑血管疾病患者认知功能障碍的有用工具,可以作为MoCA筛查认知功能障碍的合适替代或补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Predicting Zygosity based on physical similarity of twin pairs with the aid of machine learning methods. Construction and application of a model for predicting athletes' injury risk based on machine learning. Application of artificial intelligence tools and clinical documentation burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Synthetic data generation methods for longitudinal and time series health data: a systematic review. Does the integrated electronic medical record system have a positive adoption in community hospital settings?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1