A novel tobacco forecasting model by multiple sociodemographic strata in Australia.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1093/ije/dyaf038
Samantha Howe, Tim Wilson, Coral Gartner, Tony Blakely, Driss Ait Ouakrim
{"title":"A novel tobacco forecasting model by multiple sociodemographic strata in Australia.","authors":"Samantha Howe, Tim Wilson, Coral Gartner, Tony Blakely, Driss Ait Ouakrim","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australia is one of several countries aiming to achieve a commercial tobacco endgame, with a current target of ≤5% daily smoking prevalence by 2030. Like other jurisdictions, the Australian target ignores large variations in smoking across sociodemographic groups and risks perpetuating current smoking-related inequities. To help mitigate this risk, we calculated future smoking rates under business-as-usual for multiple sociodemographic categories and compared them to the endgame target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a simulated annealing optimization approach to estimate historic daily smoking rates in Australia by six dimensions of sex, age, remoteness, index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, and Indigenous status, using multiple datasets from 2001 to 2022-23. We applied logistic regression to the modelled outputs to forecast cohort smoking rates for 30 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the population level, daily smoking is expected to reach 7.8% by 2030 under business-as-usual. Of the 15 strata combinations of remoteness and socioeconomic status in the model, only two met the ≤5% target by 2030, with smoking prevalence remaining highest (34.6% in 2030) for people living in the most disadvantaged (remote, SES1) areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our modelling suggests that if equity is not at the forefront of Australian tobacco policy, ongoing smoking disparities are likely to continue even if the endgame goal is achieved. Our approach offers a crucial baseline for assessing the impact of tobacco control interventions by different sociodemographic dimensions and presents a methodological framework that could be adapted for analysing smoking-related inequities in other jurisdictions. This framework should also be extended, incorporating uncertainty into modelled estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14147,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiology","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaf038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Australia is one of several countries aiming to achieve a commercial tobacco endgame, with a current target of ≤5% daily smoking prevalence by 2030. Like other jurisdictions, the Australian target ignores large variations in smoking across sociodemographic groups and risks perpetuating current smoking-related inequities. To help mitigate this risk, we calculated future smoking rates under business-as-usual for multiple sociodemographic categories and compared them to the endgame target.

Methods: We used a simulated annealing optimization approach to estimate historic daily smoking rates in Australia by six dimensions of sex, age, remoteness, index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, and Indigenous status, using multiple datasets from 2001 to 2022-23. We applied logistic regression to the modelled outputs to forecast cohort smoking rates for 30 years.

Results: At the population level, daily smoking is expected to reach 7.8% by 2030 under business-as-usual. Of the 15 strata combinations of remoteness and socioeconomic status in the model, only two met the ≤5% target by 2030, with smoking prevalence remaining highest (34.6% in 2030) for people living in the most disadvantaged (remote, SES1) areas.

Conclusions: Our modelling suggests that if equity is not at the forefront of Australian tobacco policy, ongoing smoking disparities are likely to continue even if the endgame goal is achieved. Our approach offers a crucial baseline for assessing the impact of tobacco control interventions by different sociodemographic dimensions and presents a methodological framework that could be adapted for analysing smoking-related inequities in other jurisdictions. This framework should also be extended, incorporating uncertainty into modelled estimates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚多社会人口阶层的烟草预测新模型。
背景:澳大利亚是旨在实现商业烟草终局的几个国家之一,目前的目标是到2030年每日吸烟率≤5%。与其他司法管辖区一样,澳大利亚的目标忽略了不同社会人口群体在吸烟方面的巨大差异,并有可能使当前与吸烟相关的不平等现象永续下去。为了降低这一风险,我们计算了多个社会人口统计类别在一切照旧情况下的未来吸烟率,并将其与最终目标进行了比较。方法:采用模拟退火优化方法,利用2001年至2022-23年的多个数据集,通过性别、年龄、偏远地区、相对社会经济优势和劣势指数以及土著地位等六个维度估算澳大利亚历史日吸烟率。我们对模型输出应用逻辑回归来预测30年的队列吸烟率。结果:在人口水平上,在一切照旧的情况下,预计到2030年日吸烟率将达到7.8%。在模型中偏远地区和社会经济地位的15个分层组合中,只有两个达到了到2030年≤5%的目标,生活在最贫困地区(偏远地区,SES1)的人们的吸烟率仍然最高(2030年为34.6%)。结论:我们的模型表明,如果公平不是澳大利亚烟草政策的前沿,即使最终目标实现,持续的吸烟差距也可能继续存在。我们的方法为从不同的社会人口维度评估烟草控制干预措施的影响提供了一个重要的基线,并提出了一个方法框架,可用于分析其他司法管辖区与吸烟相关的不公平现象。这个框架也应该扩展,将不确定性纳入模型估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of epidemiology
International journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Epidemiology is a vital resource for individuals seeking to stay updated on the latest advancements and emerging trends in the field of epidemiology worldwide. The journal fosters communication among researchers, educators, and practitioners involved in the study, teaching, and application of epidemiology pertaining to both communicable and non-communicable diseases. It also includes research on health services and medical care. Furthermore, the journal presents new methodologies in epidemiology and statistics, catering to professionals working in social and preventive medicine. Published six times a year, the International Journal of Epidemiology provides a comprehensive platform for the analysis of data. Overall, this journal is an indispensable tool for staying informed and connected within the dynamic realm of epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Exposure measurement error in air-pollution epidemiology and its determinants: results from the MELONS study. Multimorbidity trends in Catalonia, 2010-21: a population-based cohort study. Oral contraceptive use and risk of melanoma in a large cohort of Dutch nurses. Reported problems and responses during the conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review. Prenatal exposure to wildfire PM2.5 and pregnancy loss in Colorado, USA, 2007-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1