Further Evidence for Awareness of Implicit Attitudes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Evaluations Extends Across Different Implicit Measures and Different Prediction Tasks.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1177/01461672251328064
Michael R Andreychik, Samantha C Fuchs
{"title":"Further Evidence for Awareness of Implicit Attitudes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Evaluations Extends Across Different Implicit Measures and Different Prediction Tasks.","authors":"Michael R Andreychik, Samantha C Fuchs","doi":"10.1177/01461672251328064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Calling into question the pervasive assumption that people lack awareness of their own implicit evaluations, a growing body of research has demonstrated that people are quite accurate when predicting how they will perform on implicit measures. However, given both the theoretical and practical implications of understanding the extent to which people are aware of the cognitions reflected on implicit measures, it is crucial to examine the generality of this finding. Across four studies using two different measures of implicit evaluations, two different prediction tasks, and multiple target categories, we replicated the key finding that people are quite accurate in predicting their performance on implicit measures. Combining these results with those from existing work strongly suggests that people's ability to accurately predict their performance on implicit measures is not simply an artifact of the particular measure used to tap implicit evaluations or the particular way in which predictions are assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1461672251328064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251328064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calling into question the pervasive assumption that people lack awareness of their own implicit evaluations, a growing body of research has demonstrated that people are quite accurate when predicting how they will perform on implicit measures. However, given both the theoretical and practical implications of understanding the extent to which people are aware of the cognitions reflected on implicit measures, it is crucial to examine the generality of this finding. Across four studies using two different measures of implicit evaluations, two different prediction tasks, and multiple target categories, we replicated the key finding that people are quite accurate in predicting their performance on implicit measures. Combining these results with those from existing work strongly suggests that people's ability to accurately predict their performance on implicit measures is not simply an artifact of the particular measure used to tap implicit evaluations or the particular way in which predictions are assessed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内隐态度意识的进一步证据:对内隐评价的准确预测适用于不同的内隐测量方法和不同的预测任务。
越来越多的研究表明,人们在预测自己在内隐性测量中的表现时是相当准确的,这就对人们普遍缺乏对自己内隐评价的意识这一假设提出了质疑。然而,鉴于了解人们在多大程度上意识到内隐测量所反映的认知具有理论和实践意义,因此研究这一发现的普遍性至关重要。在使用两种不同的内隐评价测量、两种不同的预测任务和多个目标类别的四项研究中,我们重复了人们在预测自己的内隐测量表现时相当准确这一关键发现。将这些结果与现有研究结果相结合,可以有力地说明,人们准确预测自己在内隐性测量中的表现的能力,并不仅仅是用来挖掘内隐性评价的特定测量方法或评估预测的特定方式所造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
New Wine in an Old Bottle? Exposure to Bullying-Related Media and Bullying Perpetration Behavior in Daily Life Among Adolescents. Cultural Tightness-Looseness and Individual Differences in Non-Normativeness Predict Stigmatization of Out-Groups: A Multilevel Cross-Cultural Study. Expressing Negativity Enhances Support From Romantic Partners, Even for Trivial Stressors. Is Progressive Ideology on the Test? Education and Intelligence in the Development of Nontraditional Attitudes. Prototype Facial Response to Cute Stimuli: Expression and Recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1