Baby steps to mastery: building blocks for novices in pediatric regional anesthesia.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2025-106434
John G Hagen, Deepa Kattail, Natalie Barnett, Robert Scott Dingeman, Cassandra Hoffmann, Michele Nichols, Angela D Stengel, Sampaguita Tafoya, Claude Ecoffey, Giorgio Ivani, Tripali Kundu, Per-Arne Lönnqvist, Annabel Pearson, Robert Wilder, Debabrata Banik, Noreddine Bouarroudj, Cheryl S L Chooi, Nandini Dave, Palanichamy Gurumoorthi, Kathryn S Handlogten, Stefan Heschl, James Koziol, J Matthew Kynes, Gabriela Lopez, Amjad Maniar, Maryrose Osazuwa, Vrushali Ponde, Ban C H Tsui, Lloyd R Turbitt, Santhanam Suresh
{"title":"Baby steps to mastery: building blocks for novices in pediatric regional anesthesia.","authors":"John G Hagen, Deepa Kattail, Natalie Barnett, Robert Scott Dingeman, Cassandra Hoffmann, Michele Nichols, Angela D Stengel, Sampaguita Tafoya, Claude Ecoffey, Giorgio Ivani, Tripali Kundu, Per-Arne Lönnqvist, Annabel Pearson, Robert Wilder, Debabrata Banik, Noreddine Bouarroudj, Cheryl S L Chooi, Nandini Dave, Palanichamy Gurumoorthi, Kathryn S Handlogten, Stefan Heschl, James Koziol, J Matthew Kynes, Gabriela Lopez, Amjad Maniar, Maryrose Osazuwa, Vrushali Ponde, Ban C H Tsui, Lloyd R Turbitt, Santhanam Suresh","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric regional anesthesia offers significant benefits, yet its adoption faces barriers, including perceived overcomplexity. This study aimed to identify and establish a set of core, high-value, low-complexity nerve blocks to improve perioperative pain management in pediatric patients. A four-round modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with an international panel of pediatric and regional anesthesia experts. An initial long list of regional techniques was compiled by the Steering Committee and refined through iterative input. Panelists rated each technique on a 10-point Likert scale for importance. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of panelists assigning a mean importance score of ≥8. Techniques receiving 50%-74% agreement were categorized as having strong agreement and considered for inclusion. The final selection was confirmed through a virtual roundtable discussion. Thirty-three experts representing 12 pediatric and regional societies participated. Consensus was reached on six regional techniques, with strong agreement (*) on two additional techniques, identifying eight core pediatric regional anesthesia blocks: supraclavicular brachial plexus block, rectus sheath block, transverse abdominis plane block*, suprainguinal fascia iliaca block*, femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, popliteal sciatic nerve block, and landmark-based caudal block. This consensus-driven framework defines a core set of pediatric regional anesthesia techniques that balance clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and accessibility. These findings provide a practical entry point for practitioners looking to incorporate pediatric regional anesthesia into their practice, regardless of prior experience. Future efforts should focus on standardized training, implementation research, and policy initiatives to support widespread adoption and improve perioperative pain management in children globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106434","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric regional anesthesia offers significant benefits, yet its adoption faces barriers, including perceived overcomplexity. This study aimed to identify and establish a set of core, high-value, low-complexity nerve blocks to improve perioperative pain management in pediatric patients. A four-round modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with an international panel of pediatric and regional anesthesia experts. An initial long list of regional techniques was compiled by the Steering Committee and refined through iterative input. Panelists rated each technique on a 10-point Likert scale for importance. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of panelists assigning a mean importance score of ≥8. Techniques receiving 50%-74% agreement were categorized as having strong agreement and considered for inclusion. The final selection was confirmed through a virtual roundtable discussion. Thirty-three experts representing 12 pediatric and regional societies participated. Consensus was reached on six regional techniques, with strong agreement (*) on two additional techniques, identifying eight core pediatric regional anesthesia blocks: supraclavicular brachial plexus block, rectus sheath block, transverse abdominis plane block*, suprainguinal fascia iliaca block*, femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, popliteal sciatic nerve block, and landmark-based caudal block. This consensus-driven framework defines a core set of pediatric regional anesthesia techniques that balance clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and accessibility. These findings provide a practical entry point for practitioners looking to incorporate pediatric regional anesthesia into their practice, regardless of prior experience. Future efforts should focus on standardized training, implementation research, and policy initiatives to support widespread adoption and improve perioperative pain management in children globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿的步骤掌握:在儿科区域麻醉的新手积木。
儿科区域麻醉提供了显著的好处,但它的采用面临障碍,包括被认为过于复杂。本研究旨在确定并建立一套核心、高价值、低复杂性的神经阻滞来改善儿科患者围手术期疼痛管理。一个由儿科和区域麻醉专家组成的国际小组进行了一项四轮修正德尔菲共识研究。指导委员会初步编制了一份长长的区域技术清单,并通过反复投入加以完善。小组成员对每项技术的重要性进行了10分的李克特评分。共识定义为≥75%的小组成员给予≥8的平均重要性评分。获得50%-74%一致性的技术被归类为具有强烈一致性并考虑纳入。最终的选择是通过虚拟圆桌讨论确定的。代表12个儿科和区域学会的33名专家参加了会议。六种区域麻醉技术达成共识,另外两种技术达成强烈一致(*),确定了八种核心儿科区域麻醉阻滞:锁骨上臂丛阻滞、直肌鞘阻滞、腹横面阻滞、腹股沟上筋膜髂阻滞、股神经阻滞、内收管阻滞、腘窝坐骨神经阻滞和标志性尾侧阻滞。这个共识驱动的框架定义了一套核心儿科区域麻醉技术,以平衡临床有效性、可行性和可及性。这些发现为从业人员提供了一个实用的切入点,希望将儿科区域麻醉纳入他们的实践,而不管以前的经验。未来的努力应集中在标准化培训、实施研究和政策倡议上,以支持全球儿童的广泛采用和改善围手术期疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Lost in conversion: navigating the challenges of converting intrathecal opioids to oral equivalents-a case report and literature review. Effect of liposomal bupivacaine thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Crystallization of local anesthetic mixtures with adjuvants and the effect of micropore filtration. Clinically feasible TENS-pressure-cuff paradigm for conditioned pain modulation. Treatment gaps for opioid use disorder among commercially insured US surgical patients, 2016-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1