A natural experiment on the effect of herpes zoster vaccination on dementia

IF 48.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-08800-x
Markus Eyting, Min Xie, Felix Michalik, Simon Heß, Seunghun Chung, Pascal Geldsetzer
{"title":"A natural experiment on the effect of herpes zoster vaccination on dementia","authors":"Markus Eyting, Min Xie, Felix Michalik, Simon Heß, Seunghun Chung, Pascal Geldsetzer","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-08800-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neurotropic herpesviruses may be implicated in the development of dementia1–5. Moreover, vaccines may have important off-target immunological effects6–9. Here we aim to determine the effect of live-attenuated herpes zoster vaccination on the occurrence of dementia diagnoses. To provide causal as opposed to correlational evidence, we take advantage of the fact that, in Wales, eligibility for the zoster vaccine was determined on the basis of an individual’s exact date of birth. Those born before 2 September 1933 were ineligible and remained ineligible for life, whereas those born on or after 2 September 1933 were eligible for at least 1 year to receive the vaccine. Using large-scale electronic health record data, we first show that the percentage of adults who received the vaccine increased from 0.01% among patients who were merely 1 week too old to be eligible, to 47.2% among those who were just 1 week younger. Apart from this large difference in the probability of ever receiving the zoster vaccine, individuals born just 1 week before 2 September 1933 are unlikely to differ systematically from those born 1 week later. Using these comparison groups in a regression discontinuity design, we show that receiving the zoster vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis over a follow-up period of 7 years by 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6–7.1, P = 0.019), corresponding to a 20.0% (95% CI = 6.5–33.4) relative reduction. This protective effect was stronger among women than men. We successfully confirm our findings in a different population (England and Wales’s combined population), with a different type of data (death certificates) and using an outcome (deaths with dementia as primary cause) that is closely related to dementia, but less reliant on a timely diagnosis of dementia by the healthcare system10. Through the use of a unique natural experiment, this study provides evidence of a dementia-preventing or dementia-delaying effect from zoster vaccination that is less vulnerable to confounding and bias than the existing associational evidence. Using a natural experiment that avoids common bias concerns, this study finds that the live-attenuated shingles vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis within a follow-up period of 7 years by approximately one-fifth.","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"641 8062","pages":"438-446"},"PeriodicalIF":48.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08800-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08800-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurotropic herpesviruses may be implicated in the development of dementia1–5. Moreover, vaccines may have important off-target immunological effects6–9. Here we aim to determine the effect of live-attenuated herpes zoster vaccination on the occurrence of dementia diagnoses. To provide causal as opposed to correlational evidence, we take advantage of the fact that, in Wales, eligibility for the zoster vaccine was determined on the basis of an individual’s exact date of birth. Those born before 2 September 1933 were ineligible and remained ineligible for life, whereas those born on or after 2 September 1933 were eligible for at least 1 year to receive the vaccine. Using large-scale electronic health record data, we first show that the percentage of adults who received the vaccine increased from 0.01% among patients who were merely 1 week too old to be eligible, to 47.2% among those who were just 1 week younger. Apart from this large difference in the probability of ever receiving the zoster vaccine, individuals born just 1 week before 2 September 1933 are unlikely to differ systematically from those born 1 week later. Using these comparison groups in a regression discontinuity design, we show that receiving the zoster vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis over a follow-up period of 7 years by 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6–7.1, P = 0.019), corresponding to a 20.0% (95% CI = 6.5–33.4) relative reduction. This protective effect was stronger among women than men. We successfully confirm our findings in a different population (England and Wales’s combined population), with a different type of data (death certificates) and using an outcome (deaths with dementia as primary cause) that is closely related to dementia, but less reliant on a timely diagnosis of dementia by the healthcare system10. Through the use of a unique natural experiment, this study provides evidence of a dementia-preventing or dementia-delaying effect from zoster vaccination that is less vulnerable to confounding and bias than the existing associational evidence. Using a natural experiment that avoids common bias concerns, this study finds that the live-attenuated shingles vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis within a follow-up period of 7 years by approximately one-fifth.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带状疱疹疫苗对痴呆症影响的自然实验
嗜神经疱疹病毒可能与痴呆的发生有关1,2,3,4,5。此外,疫苗可能具有重要的脱靶免疫效应6,7,8,9。在这里,我们的目的是确定减毒带状疱疹疫苗接种对痴呆诊断发生的影响。为了提供因果关系而不是相关证据,我们利用了这样一个事实,即在威尔士,带状疱疹疫苗的资格是根据个人的确切出生日期确定的。在1933年9月2日之前出生的人没有资格并且终身没有资格,而在1933年9月2日或之后出生的人至少有资格在1年内接种疫苗。使用大规模的电子健康记录数据,我们首先显示,接种疫苗的成年人百分比从仅大1周而不符合资格的患者中的0.01%增加到仅年轻1周的患者中的47.2%。除了在接种带状疱疹疫苗的可能性上存在巨大差异之外,在1933年9月2日之前一周出生的人与在1933年9月2日之后一周出生的人在系统上不太可能存在差异。在回归不连续设计中使用这些对照组,我们发现,在7年的随访期间,接种带状疱疹疫苗使新痴呆诊断的概率降低了3.5个百分点(95%置信区间(CI) = 0.6-7.1, P = 0.019),对应于20.0% (95% CI = 6.5-33.4)的相对降低。这种保护作用在女性中比在男性中更强。我们成功地在不同的人群(英格兰和威尔士的合并人口)中证实了我们的发现,使用了不同类型的数据(死亡证明),并使用了与痴呆症密切相关的结果(痴呆症死亡作为主要原因),但较少依赖于医疗系统对痴呆症的及时诊断10。通过使用独特的自然实验,本研究提供了带状疱疹疫苗预防或延缓痴呆效果的证据,与现有的相关证据相比,该证据更不容易受到混淆和偏见的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
期刊最新文献
Random heteropolymers as enzyme mimics Quantifying the global eco-footprint of wearable healthcare electronics Some of your cells are not genetically yours — what can they tell us about life and death? A chiral fermionic valve driven by quantum geometry How to reduce the environmental impact of wearable health-care devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1