Interactive influence of the perceived visual richness, greenness and scenography on landscape preference of urban woodland

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Environmental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102586
Gaochao Zhang , Guowei Wu
{"title":"Interactive influence of the perceived visual richness, greenness and scenography on landscape preference of urban woodland","authors":"Gaochao Zhang ,&nbsp;Guowei Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpreting landscape preferences based on a single visual attribute easily leads to context-specific bias, limiting practical applications. This study examines the interactive effects of compositional attributes of visual greenness (Greenness) and richness of compositional elements (Richness), along with the organizational attribute of Scenography type, on preferences for urban woodland landscapes. A total of 121 participants rated their preferences for photographs depicting 54 urban woodland scenes, each varying in Richness and Greenness and categorized into six Scenography types. Linear Mixed Models revealed a significant interaction between Richness and Greenness in determining landscape preferences. Additionally, the interaction between Richness and Greenness on landscape preference was moderated by the organizational attribute, resulting in distinct patterns across various Scenography types. Some exhibited reinforcing effects between attributes, while others had a single prominent attribute that undermined the effects of the other. This article presents these interactions based on the developed model and discusses the above patterns regarding compositional and organizational visual attributes and preference from a theoretical perspective, providing practical suggestions for design and management. The results clearly signify the necessity of understanding landscape preference with an interactive perspective, and highlighted some key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to support deeper and broader explorations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102586"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425000696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpreting landscape preferences based on a single visual attribute easily leads to context-specific bias, limiting practical applications. This study examines the interactive effects of compositional attributes of visual greenness (Greenness) and richness of compositional elements (Richness), along with the organizational attribute of Scenography type, on preferences for urban woodland landscapes. A total of 121 participants rated their preferences for photographs depicting 54 urban woodland scenes, each varying in Richness and Greenness and categorized into six Scenography types. Linear Mixed Models revealed a significant interaction between Richness and Greenness in determining landscape preferences. Additionally, the interaction between Richness and Greenness on landscape preference was moderated by the organizational attribute, resulting in distinct patterns across various Scenography types. Some exhibited reinforcing effects between attributes, while others had a single prominent attribute that undermined the effects of the other. This article presents these interactions based on the developed model and discusses the above patterns regarding compositional and organizational visual attributes and preference from a theoretical perspective, providing practical suggestions for design and management. The results clearly signify the necessity of understanding landscape preference with an interactive perspective, and highlighted some key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to support deeper and broader explorations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知视觉丰富度、绿化度和景观对城市林地景观偏好的交互影响
基于单一视觉属性来解释景观偏好很容易导致特定于环境的偏见,从而限制了实际应用。本研究探讨了视觉绿度(greenness)和组成元素丰富度(rich)的组成属性以及景观类型的组织属性对城市林地景观偏好的交互影响。共有121名参与者对他们喜欢的照片进行了评分,这些照片描绘了54个城市林地场景,每个场景在丰富度和绿色程度上都有所不同,并被分为六种场景类型。线性混合模型揭示了丰富度和绿度在决定景观偏好方面的显著相互作用。此外,丰富度和绿度对景观偏好的交互作用受到组织属性的调节,导致不同景观类型的格局不同。有些人表现出属性之间的强化效应,而另一些人则有一个突出的属性,破坏了其他属性的效果。本文基于所开发的模型展示了这些交互,并从理论角度讨论了上述关于组合和组织视觉属性和偏好的模式,为设计和管理提供了实践建议。研究结果清楚地表明,有必要从互动的角度来理解景观偏好,并强调了一些需要解决的关键知识空白,以支持更深入、更广泛的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
期刊最新文献
Bringing friendship home: Home interactions as a predictor of closer interpersonal relationships Eye-tracking research on climate change communication: A systematic review Greater perceived fossil fuel reliance predicts lower support for systemic climate policies Testing the BIO-WELL scale in situ: measuring human wellbeing responses to biodiversity within forests The role of information source in climate beliefs, behavioral commitments, and policy preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1