Incorporating the voice of the child into clinical assessments for children in need

Child Protection and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100141
Katie Newman , Shanti Raman , Allison Ward
{"title":"Incorporating the voice of the child into clinical assessments for children in need","authors":"Katie Newman ,&nbsp;Shanti Raman ,&nbsp;Allison Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Upholding the voice of the child (VOC) in clinical encounters is critical to realising their rights. Evidence from inquiry reports however demonstrate that practitioners fail to adequately listen to the voice of the child in the child protection process, with a paucity of clinical protocols incorporating children's voices.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to develop a clinical protocol for incorporating the VOC in Community Paediatric clinical assessments and evaluate the VOC protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Drawing upon work carried out in London on child protection medical assessments, we used quality improvement methodology to incorporate VOC protocols in South Western Sydney's (SWS) specialised Community Paediatric clinics for vulnerable children and young people (CYP). A VOC-focused protocol guiding clinical assessments and report writing was developed for SWS Community Paediatric Clinics. Following training of clinicians, the protocol and report template was trialled over a 6-month period. We audited 40 clinic reports before and after introduction of the protocol. We interviewed referring agents and clinicians involved in these clinics to explore enablers and barriers to incorporating the VOC clinically.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Baseline audits of reports revealed that CYP were given some presence in 80 % of reports, but voices seldom recorded. Following the VOC trial, there was overall improvement in practice, with VOC recorded 65 % of the time, CYP's views and recommendations acknowledged in 88 % of reports. Clinicians and referring agents reported that the active inclusion of CYP voices in assessments was highly valued.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Incorporating CYP's voices into the clinical assessment process is feasible and celebrates best practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825000488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Upholding the voice of the child (VOC) in clinical encounters is critical to realising their rights. Evidence from inquiry reports however demonstrate that practitioners fail to adequately listen to the voice of the child in the child protection process, with a paucity of clinical protocols incorporating children's voices.

Objective

We aimed to develop a clinical protocol for incorporating the VOC in Community Paediatric clinical assessments and evaluate the VOC protocol.

Methods

Drawing upon work carried out in London on child protection medical assessments, we used quality improvement methodology to incorporate VOC protocols in South Western Sydney's (SWS) specialised Community Paediatric clinics for vulnerable children and young people (CYP). A VOC-focused protocol guiding clinical assessments and report writing was developed for SWS Community Paediatric Clinics. Following training of clinicians, the protocol and report template was trialled over a 6-month period. We audited 40 clinic reports before and after introduction of the protocol. We interviewed referring agents and clinicians involved in these clinics to explore enablers and barriers to incorporating the VOC clinically.

Findings

Baseline audits of reports revealed that CYP were given some presence in 80 % of reports, but voices seldom recorded. Following the VOC trial, there was overall improvement in practice, with VOC recorded 65 % of the time, CYP's views and recommendations acknowledged in 88 % of reports. Clinicians and referring agents reported that the active inclusion of CYP voices in assessments was highly valued.

Conclusions

Incorporating CYP's voices into the clinical assessment process is feasible and celebrates best practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将儿童的声音纳入有需要儿童的临床评估
背景在临床接触中坚持儿童的声音(VOC)对于实现儿童权利至关重要。然而,调查报告中的证据表明,在儿童保护过程中,从业人员未能充分倾听儿童的声音,纳入儿童声音的临床方案更是少之又少。目的我们旨在制定一项临床方案,将儿童之声纳入社区儿科临床评估,并对儿童之声方案进行评估。方法借鉴在伦敦开展的儿童保护医疗评估工作,我们采用质量改进方法,在悉尼西南部(SWS)的社区儿科专科诊所为弱势儿童和青少年(CYP)纳入 VOC 协议。为南悉尼西区社区儿科诊所制定了一份以 VOC 为重点的协议,用于指导临床评估和报告撰写。对临床医生进行培训后,在 6 个月内试用了该方案和报告模板。我们审核了采用该方案前后的 40 份门诊报告。我们对转诊代理和参与这些诊所的临床医生进行了访谈,以探讨在临床上采用 VOC 的有利因素和障碍。研究结果对报告的基线审核显示,80% 的报告中都有儿童青少年的身影,但很少记录他们的声音。在 VOC 试验之后,临床实践总体上有了改进,65% 的报告记录了 VOC,88% 的报告认可了 CYP 的意见和建议。临床医生和转介机构报告说,在评估中积极纳入儿童青少年的声音得到了高度评价。结论在临床评估过程中纳入儿童青少年的声音是可行的,也是最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in hospitalizations resulting from violent injuries among children and youth in British Columbia during the COVID-19 pandemic Role of social norms on early child marriage decisions among the parents of married and unmarried adolescent girls: Findings from a matched study in Bangladesh Measuring social and community services for children, youth, and families in contact with the child welfare system: A scoping review Sarah's story: A Canadian narrative case study and systems map of the complex barriers IPV victim-survivors and their children must navigate Assessing the impacts on child welfare practice of important articles of the UN convention on the rights of the child: A comparison of Australia, Canada and the USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1