Gowtham Balasundaram , Pallavi Gahlot , Rendra Hakim Hafyan , Vinay Kumar Tyagi , Siddharth Gadkari , Ashish Sahu , Bill Barber , Pravin K. Mutiyar , A.A. Kazmi , Harald Kleiven
{"title":"Anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolysis pretreated sludge: Process performance, metagenomic analysis, techno-economic and life cycle assessment","authors":"Gowtham Balasundaram , Pallavi Gahlot , Rendra Hakim Hafyan , Vinay Kumar Tyagi , Siddharth Gadkari , Ashish Sahu , Bill Barber , Pravin K. Mutiyar , A.A. Kazmi , Harald Kleiven","doi":"10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assessed the potential of thermal hydrolysis process (THP) combined with anaerobic digestion (AD) for high solids sewage sludge treatment across various hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Optimal performance was achieved at a 10-day HRT (6 kg VS/m<sup>3</sup>·day), yielding 408 L CH<sub>4</sub>/kg VS added and 54 % volatile solids (VS) removal under THP conditions of 160 °C, 30 min, and 6 bar pressure. Microbial analysis revealed predominant acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Four scenarios were designed and analyzed for environmental and economic performance: Scenario 1 (conventional AD-CHP), Scenario 2 (conventional AD-BioCNG), Scenario 3 (THP AD-BioCNG), and Scenario 4 (THP AD-CHP). The results showed that scenarios with CHP integration achieved better environmental performance by generating sufficient energy to meet demand, with energy consumption as a key factor. Notably, scenario 4 had the lowest global warming potential (GWP) at −0.0185 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, outperforming conventional AD (Scenario 1) with CHP, which had a GWP of −0.00232 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq. However, profitability analysis showed that Scenario 3 was the most economically viable, with a net present value (NPV) of $4.3 million, an internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.21 %, and a 17-year payback period. Although it had higher capital ($58 million) and operational costs ($12.5 million/year) than Scenario 4 ($45 million and $8.6 million/year), its greater biomethane yield resulted in higher revenue ($20.7 million/year), making it the most profitable option. While Scenario 4 offered the best environmental benefits, Scenario 3 emerged as the most financially sustainable choice. These findings highlight the environmental and economic advantage of utilizing THP-AD process over conventional AD, suggesting that THP-AD optimizes methane production, solids reduction, and environmental impact, making the Bio CNG pathway a sustainable and economically viable option.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":258,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology","volume":"428 ","pages":"Article 132470"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852425004365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the potential of thermal hydrolysis process (THP) combined with anaerobic digestion (AD) for high solids sewage sludge treatment across various hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Optimal performance was achieved at a 10-day HRT (6 kg VS/m3·day), yielding 408 L CH4/kg VS added and 54 % volatile solids (VS) removal under THP conditions of 160 °C, 30 min, and 6 bar pressure. Microbial analysis revealed predominant acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Four scenarios were designed and analyzed for environmental and economic performance: Scenario 1 (conventional AD-CHP), Scenario 2 (conventional AD-BioCNG), Scenario 3 (THP AD-BioCNG), and Scenario 4 (THP AD-CHP). The results showed that scenarios with CHP integration achieved better environmental performance by generating sufficient energy to meet demand, with energy consumption as a key factor. Notably, scenario 4 had the lowest global warming potential (GWP) at −0.0185 kg CO2-eq, outperforming conventional AD (Scenario 1) with CHP, which had a GWP of −0.00232 kg CO2-eq. However, profitability analysis showed that Scenario 3 was the most economically viable, with a net present value (NPV) of $4.3 million, an internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.21 %, and a 17-year payback period. Although it had higher capital ($58 million) and operational costs ($12.5 million/year) than Scenario 4 ($45 million and $8.6 million/year), its greater biomethane yield resulted in higher revenue ($20.7 million/year), making it the most profitable option. While Scenario 4 offered the best environmental benefits, Scenario 3 emerged as the most financially sustainable choice. These findings highlight the environmental and economic advantage of utilizing THP-AD process over conventional AD, suggesting that THP-AD optimizes methane production, solids reduction, and environmental impact, making the Bio CNG pathway a sustainable and economically viable option.
本研究评估了热水解工艺(THP)结合厌氧消化(AD)在不同水力停留时间(HRTs)下处理高固体污泥的潜力。在160°C、30 min、6 bar压力的THP条件下,10天HRT (6 kg VS/m3·天)的最佳性能达到了408 L CH4/kg VS和54%挥发性固体(VS)的去除率。微生物分析显示主要产丙酮酸菌和氢营养型甲烷菌。设计并分析了四种情景:情景1(传统AD-CHP)、情景2(传统AD-BioCNG)、情景3 (THP AD-BioCNG)和情景4 (THP AD-CHP)。结果表明,以能源消耗为关键因素,热电联产方案能够产生足够的能源来满足需求,从而获得更好的环境绩效。值得注意的是,情景4的全球变暖潜能值(GWP)最低,为- 0.0185 kg CO2-eq,优于传统的热电联产AD(情景1),其GWP为- 0.00232 kg CO2-eq。然而,盈利能力分析表明,方案3在经济上是最可行的,净现值(NPV)为430万美元,内部收益率(IRR)为10.21%,投资回收期为17年。尽管该方案的资本(5800万美元)和运营成本(1250万美元/年)高于方案4(4500万美元/年和860万美元/年),但其更高的生物甲烷产量带来了更高的收入(2070万美元/年),使其成为最有利可图的选择。虽然方案4提供了最佳的环境效益,但方案3在财务上是最可持续的选择。这些研究结果强调了利用THP-AD工艺优于传统AD工艺的环境和经济优势,表明THP-AD工艺优化了甲烷产量、固体减少和环境影响,使生物CNG途径成为一种可持续且经济可行的选择。
期刊介绍:
Bioresource Technology publishes original articles, review articles, case studies, and short communications covering the fundamentals, applications, and management of bioresource technology. The journal seeks to advance and disseminate knowledge across various areas related to biomass, biological waste treatment, bioenergy, biotransformations, bioresource systems analysis, and associated conversion or production technologies.
Topics include:
• Biofuels: liquid and gaseous biofuels production, modeling and economics
• Bioprocesses and bioproducts: biocatalysis and fermentations
• Biomass and feedstocks utilization: bioconversion of agro-industrial residues
• Environmental protection: biological waste treatment
• Thermochemical conversion of biomass: combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, catalysis.