Effects of Commuter Cycling on Physical Activity, Cardiometabolic Health and Body Composition

B. James Novis, Elaine A. Hargreaves, Tim Jowett, Nancy J. Rehrer
{"title":"Effects of Commuter Cycling on Physical Activity, Cardiometabolic Health and Body Composition","authors":"B. James Novis,&nbsp;Elaine A. Hargreaves,&nbsp;Tim Jowett,&nbsp;Nancy J. Rehrer","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of a 10-week commuter cycling intervention on physical activity (PA), cardiometabolic health and body composition. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in healthy males and females (<i>n</i> = 26, BMI ≤ 30, ≥ 20 years ≤ 55 years). The intervention group (CYC) cycle commuted (148 ± 38 min.wk<sup>−1</sup>). The control group (CON) received public transport or petrol vouchers. <span></span><math></math>O<sub>2max</sub> increased in CYC (10.5 ± 16.2%), decreased in CON (−2.8 ± 12.3%) (<i>p</i> = 0.03). HR<sub>rest</sub> decreased in CYC (−5.4 ± 6.8%), increased in CON (1.7 ± 9.5%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02) as did diastolic blood pressure (−1.2 ± 7.5%, 11.9 ± 16.5%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Weekly logbooks indicated no group difference in total PA (Group <i>p</i> = 0.15) or change over time (<i>p</i> = 0.18). CYC conducted more moderate and vigorous PA combined (<i>p</i> = 0.008). No changes in body mass were observed (CYC: wk0 78.5 ± 9.0, wk10 78.7 ± 9.0, CON: wk0 69.8 ± 6.7, wk10 70.3 ± 6.7 (<i>p</i> = 0.17), or difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.61). Body fat (sum of 4 skinfolds) was maintained similarly in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.95). Body fat (DXA) was 29.4 ± 9. 7% before and 29.5 ± 9.8% after in CYC (<i>p</i> = 0.97). The intervention did not alter C-reactive protein, HDL, LDL, or total cholesterol, fasting glucose, insulin or HOMA-IR (<i>p &gt; 0.05)</i>. In conclusion, some cardiovascular benefits can occur with commuter cycling even if total PA and body composition are not altered. The increase in more intensive PA is likely responsible for the enhanced cardiovascular fitness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZTCR:12617000123347)</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of a 10-week commuter cycling intervention on physical activity (PA), cardiometabolic health and body composition. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in healthy males and females (n = 26, BMI ≤ 30, ≥ 20 years ≤ 55 years). The intervention group (CYC) cycle commuted (148 ± 38 min.wk−1). The control group (CON) received public transport or petrol vouchers. O2max increased in CYC (10.5 ± 16.2%), decreased in CON (−2.8 ± 12.3%) (p = 0.03). HRrest decreased in CYC (−5.4 ± 6.8%), increased in CON (1.7 ± 9.5%) (p = 0.02) as did diastolic blood pressure (−1.2 ± 7.5%, 11.9 ± 16.5%, respectively, p = 0.02). Weekly logbooks indicated no group difference in total PA (Group p = 0.15) or change over time (p = 0.18). CYC conducted more moderate and vigorous PA combined (p = 0.008). No changes in body mass were observed (CYC: wk0 78.5 ± 9.0, wk10 78.7 ± 9.0, CON: wk0 69.8 ± 6.7, wk10 70.3 ± 6.7 (p = 0.17), or difference between groups (p = 0.61). Body fat (sum of 4 skinfolds) was maintained similarly in both groups (p = 0.95). Body fat (DXA) was 29.4 ± 9. 7% before and 29.5 ± 9.8% after in CYC (p = 0.97). The intervention did not alter C-reactive protein, HDL, LDL, or total cholesterol, fasting glucose, insulin or HOMA-IR (p > 0.05). In conclusion, some cardiovascular benefits can occur with commuter cycling even if total PA and body composition are not altered. The increase in more intensive PA is likely responsible for the enhanced cardiovascular fitness.

Trial Registration

The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZTCR:12617000123347)

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通勤骑行对身体活动、心脏代谢健康和身体成分的影响
本研究的目的是评估为期10周的通勤自行车干预对身体活动(PA)、心脏代谢健康和身体成分的影响。随机对照试验在健康男性和女性(n = 26, BMI≤30,≥20岁≤55岁)中进行。干预组(CYC)周期缩短(148±38 min.wk−1)。对照组(CON)接受公共交通或汽油券。O2max增加本体(10.5±16.2%),减少欺诈(−2.8±12.3%)(p = 0.03)。CYC组HRrest降低(- 5.4±6.8%),CON组HRrest升高(1.7±9.5%)(p = 0.02),舒张压升高(分别为- 1.2±7.5%、11.9±16.5%,p = 0.02)。每周日志显示总PA没有组间差异(组p = 0.15)或随时间变化(p = 0.18)。CYC更倾向于中度和剧烈PA联合(p = 0.008)。体重无变化(CYC: wk0 78.5±9.0,wk10 78.7±9.0,CON: wk0 69.8±6.7,wk10 70.3±6.7)(p = 0.17),组间无差异(p = 0.61)。两组体脂(4个皮褶的总和)保持相似(p = 0.95)。体脂(DXA)为29.4±9。CYC前为7%,CYC后为29.5±9.8% (p = 0.97)。干预没有改变c反应蛋白、HDL、LDL或总胆固醇、空腹血糖、胰岛素或HOMA-IR (p >;0.05)。综上所述,即使总PA和身体成分没有改变,通勤自行车也会对心血管产生一些益处。高强度PA的增加可能是心血管健康增强的原因。该研究已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ANZTCR:12617000123347)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Static Stretching Acutely Reduces the Ergogenic Effects of Caffeine on Sprint Performance but Not Maximal Ball Velocity in Football Players. Performance Analysis of 200 m Qualifying Time Trial: Gear Ratios, Velocity Patterns, and Acceleration Strategies The Association Between Early Sport Specialization and Injury and Career Outcomes Among National Football League Athletes Acute Hypoxia Decreases Maximum Fat Oxidation Rate During Step Incremental Exercise Normalized to Respiratory Compensation Point Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1