Margaux Didion-Gency, Alice Gauthey, Kate M. Johnson, Philipp Schuler, Charlotte Grossiord
{"title":"Leaf Excision and Exposure Duration Alter the Estimates of the Irreversible Photosynthetic Thermal Thresholds","authors":"Margaux Didion-Gency, Alice Gauthey, Kate M. Johnson, Philipp Schuler, Charlotte Grossiord","doi":"10.1111/pce.15521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Understanding plant heat tolerance requires assessing their thermal thresholds, but commonly used methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, whether the photosynthetic machinery is irreversibly damaged past these thresholds remains unclear. We determined the critical temperature (<i>T</i><sub>crit</sub>), the temperature causing a 50% reduction (<i>T</i><sub>50</sub>), and the maximum tolerable temperature (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) of photosystem II in Mediterranean cypress, Aleppo pine, and Scots pine saplings using 15- or 30-min heat exposure curves performed on living plants (in-vivo), excised needles (ex-vivo), and excised needles continuously exposed to each rising temperature (ex-vivo continuous). Dark-adapted fluorescence (<i>F<sub>v</sub></i>/<i>F<sub>m</sub></i>) and gas exchange were recorded for 4 days postheat stress to track recovery. Longer heat exposure (30 vs. 15 min) consistently led to lower <i>F<sub>v</sub></i>/<i>F<sub>m</sub></i>, <i>T</i><sub>50</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>. T<sub>50</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> were reduced in both ex-vivo conditions compared to in-vivo ones. Conversely, <i>T</i><sub>crit</sub> remained consistent between species, exposure durations, and methods. Gas exchange and <i>F<sub>v</sub></i>/<i>F<sub>m</sub></i> recovery mainly occurred before reaching <i>T</i><sub>50</sub> values (about 45°C). Our work highlights the importance of exposure duration and method selection when measuring and comparing thermal thresholds. Moreover, while T<sub>crit</sub> appears to be a reversible threshold, the photosynthetic machinery of studied species appears irreparably damaged past their T50.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":222,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Cell & Environment","volume":"48 7","pages":"5357-5368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Cell & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pce.15521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding plant heat tolerance requires assessing their thermal thresholds, but commonly used methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, whether the photosynthetic machinery is irreversibly damaged past these thresholds remains unclear. We determined the critical temperature (Tcrit), the temperature causing a 50% reduction (T50), and the maximum tolerable temperature (Tmax) of photosystem II in Mediterranean cypress, Aleppo pine, and Scots pine saplings using 15- or 30-min heat exposure curves performed on living plants (in-vivo), excised needles (ex-vivo), and excised needles continuously exposed to each rising temperature (ex-vivo continuous). Dark-adapted fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and gas exchange were recorded for 4 days postheat stress to track recovery. Longer heat exposure (30 vs. 15 min) consistently led to lower Fv/Fm, T50, and Tmax. T50 and Tmax were reduced in both ex-vivo conditions compared to in-vivo ones. Conversely, Tcrit remained consistent between species, exposure durations, and methods. Gas exchange and Fv/Fm recovery mainly occurred before reaching T50 values (about 45°C). Our work highlights the importance of exposure duration and method selection when measuring and comparing thermal thresholds. Moreover, while Tcrit appears to be a reversible threshold, the photosynthetic machinery of studied species appears irreparably damaged past their T50.
了解植物的耐热性需要评估它们的热阈值,但常用的方法很少进行比较。此外,超过这些阈值后,光合作用机制是否会受到不可逆的破坏仍不清楚。我们测定了地中海柏树、阿勒坡松和苏格兰松幼苗光系统II的临界温度(Tcrit)、导致50%减少的温度(T50)和最大耐受温度(Tmax),方法是对活植物(体内)、切除针叶(离体)和连续暴露于每次升高的针叶(离体连续)进行15或30分钟的热暴露曲线。记录高温胁迫后4天的暗适应荧光(Fv/Fm)和气体交换,以跟踪恢复情况。较长的热暴露时间(30 vs 15分钟)一致导致较低的Fv/Fm、T50和Tmax。T50和Tmax在离体条件下均比在体条件下降低。相反,Tcrit在物种、暴露时间和方法之间保持一致。气体交换和Fv/Fm回收主要发生在T50值(约45℃)之前。我们的工作强调了在测量和比较热阈值时暴露时间和方法选择的重要性。此外,虽然Tcrit似乎是一个可逆的阈值,但研究物种的光合机制在其T50之后似乎不可挽回地受损。
期刊介绍:
Plant, Cell & Environment is a premier plant science journal, offering valuable insights into plant responses to their environment. Committed to publishing high-quality theoretical and experimental research, the journal covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from molecular to community levels. Researchers exploring various aspects of plant biology, physiology, and ecology contribute to the journal's comprehensive understanding of plant-environment interactions.