Metabolic Flexibility as a Candidate Mechanism for the Development of Postoperative Morbidity.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007494
Pietro Arina, John Whittle, Maciej R Kaczorek, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Evangelos B Mazomenos, Mervyn Singer
{"title":"Metabolic Flexibility as a Candidate Mechanism for the Development of Postoperative Morbidity.","authors":"Pietro Arina, John Whittle, Maciej R Kaczorek, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Evangelos B Mazomenos, Mervyn Singer","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the role of metabolic flexibility in determining perioperative outcomes. Metabolic flexibility, a key feature of metabolic health, is the ability to efficiently switch between different fuel sources (predominantly carbohydrates and fats) depending on energy demands and availability. Given the rapidly changing physiological conditions in the perioperative period, we hypothesized that good metabolic adaptability could mitigate postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study utilizing a prospectively collected, single-center preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) database of patients undergoing a range of major surgeries between 2012 and 2022. On day 3, patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) scores: 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 6. Metabolic flexibility was evaluated through measurements of fat and carbohydrate oxidation during exercise testing (CPET). Associations were explored between metabolic flexibility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 585 patients, those with no or low postoperative day 3 morbidity (POMS 0-1; n = 204) demonstrated significantly higher fat oxidation early in exercise before anaerobic threshold (fatty acid oxidation [FATox] area under the curve [AUC] 826 [578-1147]) compared to both POMS 2 (658 [448-922; n = 268]) and POMS 3 to 6 (608 [414-845; n = 113]); both P < .001. POMS 0 to 1 patients also had more effective carbohydrate utilization at peak exercise intensity. Higher postoperative morbidity (POMS) categories were associated with diminished metabolic flexibility characterized by a reduced ability to switch between metabolic substrates-carbohydrate oxidation (CHOox) POMS 0 to 1 group AUC 10277 (interquartile range [IQR] 7773-13358) compared to POMS 2 AUC 8356 (IQR 6548-10377) and POMS 3 to 6 AUC 6696 (IQR 473-9392); both P < .001. Reduced metabolic flexibility correlated with increased postoperative complications and an extended hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metabolic flexibility may be a pivotal factor in determining postoperative outcomes. Patients with greater metabolic adaptability had fewer complications and shorter hospitalization by 4 days on average. This suggests that preoperative metabolic conditioning-something potentially achieved by targeted prehabilitation-could be linked to surgical recovery. Future research should focus on prospective studies to confirm these relationships and explore underlying mechanisms. If confirmed, metabolic flexibility assessments could be integrated into routine preoperative evaluation to better predict and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"1078-1088"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the role of metabolic flexibility in determining perioperative outcomes. Metabolic flexibility, a key feature of metabolic health, is the ability to efficiently switch between different fuel sources (predominantly carbohydrates and fats) depending on energy demands and availability. Given the rapidly changing physiological conditions in the perioperative period, we hypothesized that good metabolic adaptability could mitigate postoperative complications.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study utilizing a prospectively collected, single-center preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) database of patients undergoing a range of major surgeries between 2012 and 2022. On day 3, patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) scores: 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 6. Metabolic flexibility was evaluated through measurements of fat and carbohydrate oxidation during exercise testing (CPET). Associations were explored between metabolic flexibility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Of 585 patients, those with no or low postoperative day 3 morbidity (POMS 0-1; n = 204) demonstrated significantly higher fat oxidation early in exercise before anaerobic threshold (fatty acid oxidation [FATox] area under the curve [AUC] 826 [578-1147]) compared to both POMS 2 (658 [448-922; n = 268]) and POMS 3 to 6 (608 [414-845; n = 113]); both P < .001. POMS 0 to 1 patients also had more effective carbohydrate utilization at peak exercise intensity. Higher postoperative morbidity (POMS) categories were associated with diminished metabolic flexibility characterized by a reduced ability to switch between metabolic substrates-carbohydrate oxidation (CHOox) POMS 0 to 1 group AUC 10277 (interquartile range [IQR] 7773-13358) compared to POMS 2 AUC 8356 (IQR 6548-10377) and POMS 3 to 6 AUC 6696 (IQR 473-9392); both P < .001. Reduced metabolic flexibility correlated with increased postoperative complications and an extended hospital stay.

Conclusions: Metabolic flexibility may be a pivotal factor in determining postoperative outcomes. Patients with greater metabolic adaptability had fewer complications and shorter hospitalization by 4 days on average. This suggests that preoperative metabolic conditioning-something potentially achieved by targeted prehabilitation-could be linked to surgical recovery. Future research should focus on prospective studies to confirm these relationships and explore underlying mechanisms. If confirmed, metabolic flexibility assessments could be integrated into routine preoperative evaluation to better predict and improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢灵活性作为术后发病率发展的候选机制。
背景:本研究探讨代谢柔韧性在围手术期预后中的作用。代谢灵活性是代谢健康的一个关键特征,是根据能量需求和可用性在不同燃料来源(主要是碳水化合物和脂肪)之间有效切换的能力。鉴于围手术期快速变化的生理条件,我们假设良好的代谢适应性可以减轻术后并发症。方法:我们利用前瞻性收集的单中心术前心肺运动试验(CPET)数据库进行了一项回顾性观察研究,该数据库包括2012年至2022年期间接受一系列大手术的患者。第3天,根据患者术后发病率调查(POMS)评分将患者分为3组:0 ~ 1、2和3 ~ 6。通过运动测试(CPET)中脂肪和碳水化合物氧化的测量来评估代谢灵活性。探讨了代谢灵活性、心肺健康和术后结果之间的关系。结果:585例患者中,术后第3天无或低发病率(POMS 0-1;n = 204)在无氧阈前的运动早期表现出明显更高的脂肪氧化(脂肪酸氧化[FATox]曲线下面积[AUC] 826[578-1147]),与两种POMS 2 (658 [448-922;n = 268])和POMS 3 ~ 6 (608 [414-845;N = 113]);P < 0.001。POMS 0 ~ 1患者在运动强度峰值时碳水化合物利用率更高。与POMS 2 AUC 8356 (IQR 6548-10377)和POMS 3- 6 AUC 6696 (IQR 473-9392)相比,较高的术后发病率(POMS)类别与代谢灵活性降低相关,其特征是代谢底物-碳水化合物氧化(chox) POMS 0至1组AUC 10277(四分位数范围[IQR] 7773-13358)之间切换能力降低;P < 0.001。代谢灵活性降低与术后并发症增加和住院时间延长相关。结论:代谢灵活性可能是决定术后预后的关键因素。代谢适应性强的患者并发症少,住院时间平均缩短4天。这表明术前代谢调节——通过有针对性的预防可能达到的目标——可能与手术恢复有关。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性研究,以确认这些关系并探索潜在的机制。如果得到证实,代谢柔韧性评估可纳入常规术前评估,以更好地预测和改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Walking a Few Steps Alongside. Outcomes of Nontransfusable and Transfusable Patients After Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Season and Depression Scores Among Anesthesiology Residents: A Multicenter, Longitudinal Survey Study. Enhancing Anesthesia Research: The Imperative of Consumer Engagement Into Clinical Research. Clarifying the Guidelines and Decoding the Enigma: Strategies for Anesthetic Management of Patients on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1