Recurrent Interneuron Connectivity Does Not Support Synchrony in a Biophysical Dentate Gyrus Model.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-04-23 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0097-25.2025
Daniel Müller-Komorowska, Temma Fujishige, Tomoki Fukai
{"title":"Recurrent Interneuron Connectivity Does Not Support Synchrony in a Biophysical Dentate Gyrus Model.","authors":"Daniel Müller-Komorowska, Temma Fujishige, Tomoki Fukai","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0097-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synchronous activity of neuronal networks is found in many brain areas and correlates with cognition and behavior. Gamma synchrony is particularly strong in the dentate gyrus, which is thought to process contextual information in the hippocampus. Several network mechanisms for synchrony generation have been proposed and studied computationally. One such mechanism relies solely on recurrent inhibitory interneuron connectivity, but it requires a large enough number of synapses. Here, we incorporate previously published connectivity data of the dentate gyrus from mice of either sex into a biophysical computational model to test its ability to generate synchronous activity. We find that recurrent interneuron connectivity is insufficient to induce synchronous activity. This applies to an interneuron ring network and the broader dentate gyrus circuitry. Despite asynchronous input, recurrent interneuron connectivity can have small synchronizing effects but can also desynchronize the network for some types of synaptic input. Our results suggest that biologically plausible recurrent inhibitory connectivity alone is likely insufficient to synchronize the dentate gyrus.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0097-25.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synchronous activity of neuronal networks is found in many brain areas and correlates with cognition and behavior. Gamma synchrony is particularly strong in the dentate gyrus, which is thought to process contextual information in the hippocampus. Several network mechanisms for synchrony generation have been proposed and studied computationally. One such mechanism relies solely on recurrent inhibitory interneuron connectivity, but it requires a large enough number of synapses. Here, we incorporate previously published connectivity data of the dentate gyrus from mice of either sex into a biophysical computational model to test its ability to generate synchronous activity. We find that recurrent interneuron connectivity is insufficient to induce synchronous activity. This applies to an interneuron ring network and the broader dentate gyrus circuitry. Despite asynchronous input, recurrent interneuron connectivity can have small synchronizing effects but can also desynchronize the network for some types of synaptic input. Our results suggest that biologically plausible recurrent inhibitory connectivity alone is likely insufficient to synchronize the dentate gyrus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生物物理齿状回模型中,周期性神经元间连接不支持同步性。
神经网络的同步活动在许多大脑区域被发现,并与认知和行为相关。伽马同步在齿状回中尤为强烈,它被认为在海马体中处理上下文信息。提出了几种同步生成的网络机制,并对其进行了计算研究。其中一种机制仅依赖于周期性的抑制性神经元间连接,但它需要足够多的突触。在这里,我们将先前发表的来自雌雄小鼠的齿状回连通性数据纳入生物物理计算模型,以测试其产生同步活动的能力。我们发现反复的神经元间连接不足以诱导同步活动。这适用于神经元间环网络和更广泛的齿状回回路。尽管输入是异步的,但周期性的神经元间连接可以产生较小的同步效应,但对于某些类型的突触输入,也可以使网络失同步。我们的研究结果表明,生物学上合理的反复抑制连接可能不足以同步齿状回。大脑中的神经元不是随机激活的,而是在高活动状态下与其他神经元同步活动。在负责记忆存储的大脑区域海马体中,同步活动是众所周知的,并且已经提出了周期性抑制连接来同步神经元。在这里,我们模拟了一个名为齿状回的海马体大脑区域的详细模型,并进行了现代连接估计。我们发现连接的数量不足以同步网络。这意味着其他模型更有可能解释齿状回的同步活动。此外,我们预测未来的实验干扰循环连接将不会影响同步活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Sustaining Drug Discovery Amid the Limits of Alzheimer's Disease Immunotherapies. GluN2A Enables Noradrenergic Control of Prefrontal Oscillations and Cognitive Flexibility. Small RNA barcodes for sensitive labeling of AAV transcripts. c-Maf Deletion in Cortical Somatostatin, But Not Parvalbumin, Interneurons Leads to Absence-Like Epileptiform Activity in Mice. Limited Contribution of the Lactate Receptor HCAR1 to Exercise-Induced Behavioral and Hippocampal Adaptations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1