Evaluation of vascular responses to moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval physical exercise in subjects with elevated blood pressure: a randomised, cross-over clinical trial.
Sara Rodrigues, Renata Gomes Sanches Verardino, Valéria Costa-Hong, Camila Paixao Jordao, Marcel Jose Andrade da Costa, Luiz Bortolotto
{"title":"Evaluation of vascular responses to moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval physical exercise in subjects with elevated blood pressure: a randomised, cross-over clinical trial.","authors":"Sara Rodrigues, Renata Gomes Sanches Verardino, Valéria Costa-Hong, Camila Paixao Jordao, Marcel Jose Andrade da Costa, Luiz Bortolotto","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this randomised two-period crossover trial, the objective was to compare acute changes in arterial distensibility between high-intensity interval physical exercise (HIIPE) and moderate-intensity continuous physical exercise (MICPE) sessions in subjects with elevated blood pressure (BP).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Participants underwent either MICPE-HIIPE or HIIPE-MICPE sequences with intensity based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The main outcome measures included arterial stiffness (by pulse wave velocity (PWV)) at baseline, until 30 min and 24 hours after each physical exercise session. Other measures include office BP, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and applanation tonometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 29 subjects with elevated BP (76% female, 48±7 years, body mass index=28.3±4.3 kg/m², systolic BP=126±9 mm Hg and diastolic BP=84±4 mm Hg). They presented lower PWV 24 hours after MICPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour HIIPE ((-0.83 (-1.29;-0.37) p=0.001) and (-0.98 (-1.84;-0.12), p=0.021), respectively). Despite no differences in office BP, aortic systolic BP was lower after HIIPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour MICPE (113±19; 118±10 and 117±10 mm Hg; p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In subjects with elevated BP, arterial distensibility is greater 24 hours after MICPE, while aortic systolic BP is lower after HIIPE. The particularities of each method and each exercise intensity can provide specific mechanisms of vascular response to exercise and detect vascular damage early in these subjects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04200716.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In this randomised two-period crossover trial, the objective was to compare acute changes in arterial distensibility between high-intensity interval physical exercise (HIIPE) and moderate-intensity continuous physical exercise (MICPE) sessions in subjects with elevated blood pressure (BP).
Methods and analysis: Participants underwent either MICPE-HIIPE or HIIPE-MICPE sequences with intensity based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The main outcome measures included arterial stiffness (by pulse wave velocity (PWV)) at baseline, until 30 min and 24 hours after each physical exercise session. Other measures include office BP, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and applanation tonometry.
Results: The study involved 29 subjects with elevated BP (76% female, 48±7 years, body mass index=28.3±4.3 kg/m², systolic BP=126±9 mm Hg and diastolic BP=84±4 mm Hg). They presented lower PWV 24 hours after MICPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour HIIPE ((-0.83 (-1.29;-0.37) p=0.001) and (-0.98 (-1.84;-0.12), p=0.021), respectively). Despite no differences in office BP, aortic systolic BP was lower after HIIPE compared with baseline and to 24-hour MICPE (113±19; 118±10 and 117±10 mm Hg; p=0.013).
Conclusion: In subjects with elevated BP, arterial distensibility is greater 24 hours after MICPE, while aortic systolic BP is lower after HIIPE. The particularities of each method and each exercise intensity can provide specific mechanisms of vascular response to exercise and detect vascular damage early in these subjects.
目的:在这项随机两期交叉试验中,目的是比较高血压患者在高强度间歇体育锻炼(HIIPE)和中强度连续体育锻炼(MICPE)期间动脉扩张的急性变化。方法和分析:参与者接受了基于心肺运动测试强度的MICPE-HIIPE或HIIPE-MICPE序列。主要结局指标包括基线动脉硬度(按脉搏波速度(PWV)计算),直到每次体育锻炼后30分钟和24小时。其他措施包括办公室血压,24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)和压胸测压。结果:29例血压升高患者(76%为女性,48±7岁,体重指数=28.3±4.3 kg/m²,收缩压=126±9 mm Hg,舒张压=84±4 mm Hg)。与基线和24小时HIIPE相比,MICPE后24小时的PWV较低(分别为(-0.83 (-1.29;-0.37)p=0.001)和(-0.98 (-1.84;-0.12),p=0.021)。尽管办公室血压无差异,但与基线和24小时MICPE相比,HIIPE后主动脉收缩压较低(113±19;118±10和117±10毫米汞柱;p = 0.013)。结论:在血压升高的受试者中,MICPE后24小时动脉扩张性更大,而HIIPE后主动脉收缩压更低。每种方法和每种运动强度的特殊性可以提供血管对运动反应的特定机制,并在这些受试者中早期发现血管损伤。试验注册号:NCT04200716。
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.