Theresia Choullamy, Lea Kaadi, Aren Bezdikian, Samir Hachem, Kamal Hachem
{"title":"Liver Fat Quantification With Ultrasound: The Influence of the Size of the Region of Interest on Attenuation Coefficient.","authors":"Theresia Choullamy, Lea Kaadi, Aren Bezdikian, Samir Hachem, Kamal Hachem","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Noninvasive assessment of liver fat content is crucial due to the high global prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Algorithms based on ultrasound (US) attenuation coefficient (AC) for estimating liver fat content are commercially available, but a lack of consensus exists regarding the best estimation protocol. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of the size of the region of interest (ROI) on the US AC.A prospective study was conducted. An abdominal US was done for 86 outpatients. A sampling box was positioned within the liver parenchyma, approximately 2 cm beneath the liver capsule with a ROI, measuring about 2 × 4 cm and then 4 × 5 cm, precisely placed at the center of this sampling box. Five readings of the AC were captured, and the average of these measurements was employed to assess the severity of hepatic steatosisA statistically significant difference between AC with 2 different ROI sizes was shown (P < 0.001) with AC values with 2 × 4 cm ROI were higher than those obtained with 4 × 5 cm ROI (AC mean 0.668 VS 0.653). However, the agreement between AC values obtained with 2 different ROI sizes was excellent (correlation coefficient 0.941)An ROI size dependence is observed in the measurement of AC in the liver. A standardized acquisition protocol with a fixed size of the ROI needs to be developed to minimize differences in AC measurements and to assess changes in serial measurements reliably.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Noninvasive assessment of liver fat content is crucial due to the high global prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Algorithms based on ultrasound (US) attenuation coefficient (AC) for estimating liver fat content are commercially available, but a lack of consensus exists regarding the best estimation protocol. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of the size of the region of interest (ROI) on the US AC.A prospective study was conducted. An abdominal US was done for 86 outpatients. A sampling box was positioned within the liver parenchyma, approximately 2 cm beneath the liver capsule with a ROI, measuring about 2 × 4 cm and then 4 × 5 cm, precisely placed at the center of this sampling box. Five readings of the AC were captured, and the average of these measurements was employed to assess the severity of hepatic steatosisA statistically significant difference between AC with 2 different ROI sizes was shown (P < 0.001) with AC values with 2 × 4 cm ROI were higher than those obtained with 4 × 5 cm ROI (AC mean 0.668 VS 0.653). However, the agreement between AC values obtained with 2 different ROI sizes was excellent (correlation coefficient 0.941)An ROI size dependence is observed in the measurement of AC in the liver. A standardized acquisition protocol with a fixed size of the ROI needs to be developed to minimize differences in AC measurements and to assess changes in serial measurements reliably.
摘要:由于非酒精性脂肪肝在全球的高发病率,对肝脏脂肪含量进行无创评估至关重要。基于超声衰减系数(AC)估算肝脏脂肪含量的算法已经上市,但对于最佳估算方案还缺乏共识。我们的研究旨在评估感兴趣区(ROI)大小对 US AC 的影响。我们对 86 名门诊患者进行了腹部 US 检查。在肝实质内放置一个取样盒,取样盒位于肝囊下方约 2 厘米处,取样盒中心精确放置一个 ROI,ROI 尺寸约为 2 × 4 厘米,然后为 4 × 5 厘米。2 × 4 cm ROI 的 AC 值高于 4 × 5 cm ROI 的 AC 值(AC 平均值 0.668 VS 0.653)。然而,用两个不同大小的 ROI 所获得的 AC 值之间的一致性非常好(相关系数为 0.941)。需要制定一个固定 ROI 大小的标准化采集方案,以尽量减少 AC 测量值的差异,并可靠地评估连续测量值的变化。
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography.
Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound