Can Ground Reaction Force Variables Preidentify the Probability of a Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Distance Runners?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-04-02 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1123/jab.2023-0226
Harper E Stewart, Ryan S Alcantara, Kathryn A Farina, Michael E Hahn, Alena M Grabowski, Rodger Kram, Rand R Wilcox, Jill L McNitt-Gray
{"title":"Can Ground Reaction Force Variables Preidentify the Probability of a Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Distance Runners?","authors":"Harper E Stewart, Ryan S Alcantara, Kathryn A Farina, Michael E Hahn, Alena M Grabowski, Rodger Kram, Rand R Wilcox, Jill L McNitt-Gray","doi":"10.1123/jab.2023-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of lower extremity injuries in collegiate distance runners is ∼20%. Identification of a runner sustaining a potential injury remains challenging. This exploratory, cross-institutional study sought to determine whether ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during steady-state running could identify competitive collegiate distance runners who would later sustain lower extremity injuries. Normative boundaries for 10 GRF variables during braking and propulsion were established for noninjured runners using median ± scaled median absolute deviation. A subanalysis was conducted on runners with and without impact peaks in vertical GRF to mitigate the influence of impact peaks on GRF variables. We hypothesized that prior to injury, runners who later developed an injury would have more GRF variables outside of the normative boundaries than noninjured runners. Using Cliff's method, a rank-based, nonparametric method for comparing 2 independent groups, we found no statistically significant difference between the number of variables outside the boundaries for injured and noninjured runners overall (P = .17). However, injured runners without impact peaks had more variables outside the normative boundaries than noninjured runners (P < .001). This novel analytical approach demonstrates the potential for preidentifying collegiate distance runners without impact peaks who may be at risk for injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"271-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of lower extremity injuries in collegiate distance runners is ∼20%. Identification of a runner sustaining a potential injury remains challenging. This exploratory, cross-institutional study sought to determine whether ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during steady-state running could identify competitive collegiate distance runners who would later sustain lower extremity injuries. Normative boundaries for 10 GRF variables during braking and propulsion were established for noninjured runners using median ± scaled median absolute deviation. A subanalysis was conducted on runners with and without impact peaks in vertical GRF to mitigate the influence of impact peaks on GRF variables. We hypothesized that prior to injury, runners who later developed an injury would have more GRF variables outside of the normative boundaries than noninjured runners. Using Cliff's method, a rank-based, nonparametric method for comparing 2 independent groups, we found no statistically significant difference between the number of variables outside the boundaries for injured and noninjured runners overall (P = .17). However, injured runners without impact peaks had more variables outside the normative boundaries than noninjured runners (P < .001). This novel analytical approach demonstrates the potential for preidentifying collegiate distance runners without impact peaks who may be at risk for injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地面反作用力变量能否预先识别大学生长跑运动员肌肉骨骼损伤的可能性?
大学生长跑运动员下肢受伤的发生率为 20%。识别跑步者是否可能受伤仍具有挑战性。这项跨院校的探索性研究旨在确定稳态跑步过程中的地面反作用力(GRF)特征是否能识别出日后会出现下肢损伤的大学生长跑运动员。研究人员采用中位数±比例绝对偏差中位数的方法,为未受伤的跑步者确定了制动和推进过程中 10 个地面反作用力变量的标准界限。为了减轻冲击峰对 GRF 变量的影响,我们对垂直 GRF 有冲击峰和无冲击峰的跑步者进行了子分析。我们假设,在受伤之前,与未受伤的跑步者相比,后来受伤的跑步者会有更多的 GRF 变量超出正常范围。使用克利夫法(一种基于等级的非参数方法,用于比较两个独立的组别),我们发现受伤和未受伤的跑步者的边界外变量数量总体上没有显著的统计学差异(P = .17)。然而,与未受伤的跑步者相比,没有冲击峰的受伤跑步者超出标准界限的变量更多 (P < .001)。这种新颖的分析方法证明了预先识别没有冲击峰的大学生长跑运动员的潜力,他们可能有受伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Alignment Strategies on Knee Biomechanics and Muscle Activation During Squatting After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Repeatability of Knee Kinematic Gait Outcomes Using a Novel Hospital Hallway Setup of a Markerless Motion Capture System. Effects of a Pneumatic Knee-Actuated Exoskeleton on Gait Stability During Prolonged Walking With Load Carriage. Are There Cumulative Changes in Lumbar Spine Passive Stiffness Throughout a Week of Prolonged Seated Work? Differences in Ground Reaction Force During Foot Strength Testing in Sitting and Standing Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1