Can using food waste as feed reduce the environmental footprint of Canadian beef production? A case study of cull potatoes

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104324
Genet Mengistu , Tim McAllister , Deanne Fulawka , Isaac Aboagye , Getahun Legesse , Kim Stanford , Marcos Cordeiro , Kebebe Gunte , Faith Omonijo , Karin Wittenberg , Kim Ominski
{"title":"Can using food waste as feed reduce the environmental footprint of Canadian beef production? A case study of cull potatoes","authors":"Genet Mengistu ,&nbsp;Tim McAllister ,&nbsp;Deanne Fulawka ,&nbsp;Isaac Aboagye ,&nbsp;Getahun Legesse ,&nbsp;Kim Stanford ,&nbsp;Marcos Cordeiro ,&nbsp;Kebebe Gunte ,&nbsp;Faith Omonijo ,&nbsp;Karin Wittenberg ,&nbsp;Kim Ominski","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Food loss and waste (FLW) originating from food production and subsequent agro-industrial processing and distribution is receiving increased attention as it impacts social, economic and environmental sustainability. It also results in inefficient use of land, water, and energy, contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and habitat degradation. The use of FLW as livestock feed is one solution to address these environmental concerns as well as reducing the food-feed competition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study was designed to evaluate the feed conversion ratio (FCR), land use requirements and GHG emissions of cattle management systems (calf-fed, yearling-fed and yearling-grass fed) offered: i) barley- and corn-based standard (STD) diets or ii) STD diets in which cull potatoes replaced barley and corn at 15 % and 30 % dry matter (DM) basis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Feed conversion was calculated as kg DM intake (DMI)/kg beef protein (BP; R<sub>1</sub>); kg human-edible (HE) DMI/kg BP (R<sub>2</sub>); kg protein DMI/kg BP (R<sub>3</sub>) and kg HE protein DMI/kg BP (R<sub>4</sub>). Corn and barley grain were either assumed to be grown on-farm (Scenario 1) or transported (Scenario 2) from an adjacent Ecodistrict. Further, in each scenario, emissions were estimated by considering no emissions from potato productions or 10 % emissions based on economic allocation. The Holos model and published coefficients that impact GHG emissions were used to estimate GHG emissions including those from diversion of cull potatoes from landfill.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Among FCR metrics, R<sub>2</sub> and R<sub>4</sub> provide meaningful measure of the value of cull potatoes in feedlot diets, representing the portion that would not be consumed by humans and wasted otherwise. Compared to STD diets, inclusion of cull potatoes at 15 % and 30 %, led to a 12–15 % and 24–30 % reduction in land use, respectively. Total GHG emissions were also reduced by up to 5 % and 22 % in Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, incorporating cull potatoes in feedlot diets can improve FCR, reduce land requirements and GHG emissions, and avoid the CH<sub>4</sub> emissions that would arise if they were sent to landfill.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Inclusion of non-conventional feeds such as FLW could serve as a first step in addressing the FLW challenge as well as providing alternative feedstuffs during feed shortages resulting from flood or drought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 104324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25000642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Food loss and waste (FLW) originating from food production and subsequent agro-industrial processing and distribution is receiving increased attention as it impacts social, economic and environmental sustainability. It also results in inefficient use of land, water, and energy, contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and habitat degradation. The use of FLW as livestock feed is one solution to address these environmental concerns as well as reducing the food-feed competition.

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the feed conversion ratio (FCR), land use requirements and GHG emissions of cattle management systems (calf-fed, yearling-fed and yearling-grass fed) offered: i) barley- and corn-based standard (STD) diets or ii) STD diets in which cull potatoes replaced barley and corn at 15 % and 30 % dry matter (DM) basis.

Methods

Feed conversion was calculated as kg DM intake (DMI)/kg beef protein (BP; R1); kg human-edible (HE) DMI/kg BP (R2); kg protein DMI/kg BP (R3) and kg HE protein DMI/kg BP (R4). Corn and barley grain were either assumed to be grown on-farm (Scenario 1) or transported (Scenario 2) from an adjacent Ecodistrict. Further, in each scenario, emissions were estimated by considering no emissions from potato productions or 10 % emissions based on economic allocation. The Holos model and published coefficients that impact GHG emissions were used to estimate GHG emissions including those from diversion of cull potatoes from landfill.

Results and conclusions

Among FCR metrics, R2 and R4 provide meaningful measure of the value of cull potatoes in feedlot diets, representing the portion that would not be consumed by humans and wasted otherwise. Compared to STD diets, inclusion of cull potatoes at 15 % and 30 %, led to a 12–15 % and 24–30 % reduction in land use, respectively. Total GHG emissions were also reduced by up to 5 % and 22 % in Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, incorporating cull potatoes in feedlot diets can improve FCR, reduce land requirements and GHG emissions, and avoid the CH4 emissions that would arise if they were sent to landfill.

Significance

Inclusion of non-conventional feeds such as FLW could serve as a first step in addressing the FLW challenge as well as providing alternative feedstuffs during feed shortages resulting from flood or drought.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用食物垃圾作为饲料可以减少加拿大牛肉生产的环境足迹吗?筛选土豆的案例研究
粮食生产及随后的农用工业加工和分配过程中产生的粮食损失和浪费(FLW)正受到越来越多的关注,因为它影响着社会、经济和环境的可持续性。它还导致土地、水和能源的低效利用,导致温室气体(GHG)排放和栖息地退化。使用FLW作为牲畜饲料是解决这些环境问题以及减少食品饲料竞争的一种解决方案。目的本研究旨在评价牛管理系统(犊牛饲养、1龄饲养和1龄草饲养)提供的饲料转化率(FCR)、土地利用需求和温室气体排放:1)大麦和玉米为基础的标准饲粮(STD),或2)以15%和30%干物质(DM)为基础的马铃薯替代大麦和玉米的标准饲粮(STD)。方法饲料转化率计算为:kg DM采食量(DMI)/kg牛肉蛋白(BP);R1);kg人食用(HE) DMI/kg BP (R2);kg蛋白DMI/kg BP (R3)和kg HE蛋白DMI/kg BP (R4)。玉米和大麦谷物要么在农场种植(场景1),要么从邻近的生态区运输(场景2)。此外,在每种情况下,排放量是通过考虑马铃薯生产的零排放或基于经济分配的10%排放量来估计的。Holos模型和公布的影响温室气体排放的系数被用于估计温室气体排放,包括从垃圾填埋场转移精选土豆产生的温室气体排放。结果与结论在FCR指标中,R2和R4提供了有意义的衡量剔除土豆在饲养场日粮中的价值的指标,代表了人类不会食用和浪费的部分。与STD日粮相比,15%和30%的淘汰马铃薯分别导致土地利用减少12 - 15%和24 - 30%。在情景1和情景2中,温室气体总排放量也分别减少了5%和22%。综上所述,在饲养场饲粮中添加淘汰马铃薯可以提高饲料利用率,减少土地需求和温室气体排放,并避免将其送往垃圾填埋场所产生的甲烷排放。纳入FLW等非传统饲料可以作为解决FLW挑战的第一步,并在洪水或干旱造成的饲料短缺期间提供替代饲料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Is the potential stability of forage resources under climate variability linked to transhumance patterns? An approach for sheep farming systems based on vegetation agroecological properties Quantifying crop-livestock integration for the green transition of herbivorous livestock farmers: Development of a novel index and its application in Northwest China Analyzing the disruption of agricultural systems by conflict: A case study of sunflower production in eastern Ukraine Participatory modelling for agroecological transitions: Engaging stakeholders in transformative pathways Quantifying the opportunity costs of nature-inclusive agriculture in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1