Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-04-03 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389
Sarah C Totton, Jan M Sargeant, Annette M O'Connor
{"title":"Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle.","authors":"Sarah C Totton, Jan M Sargeant, Annette M O'Connor","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as \"unvaccinated\" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as "unvaccinated" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲养场牛呼吸道疾病疫苗随机对照试验报告不完整。
我们对饲养场牛的牛呼吸道疾病疫苗试验进行了评估,发现大多数(34 篇论文中的 19 篇 [56%],43 项试验中的 26 项 [60%])论文(描述了 43 项试验中的 26 项 [60%])将对照组标为 "未接种疫苗 "或类似术语,即使试验中的所有牛在到达饲养场时都接种了疫苗。此外,44 份出版物中有 38 份(86%)(描述了 53 项试验中的 31 项 [58%])报告了牛呼吸道疾病疫苗的统计比较,但未提及所有牛在到达饲养场时都接种了呼吸道疫苗。试验作者应在摘要、方法和结果部分报告试验中给所有牛使用的动物保健产品,以防止对实际调查的比较结果产生误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Long-term sacubitril/valsartan is well tolerated in dogs with heart failure and myxomatous mitral valve disease and suggests excellent survival benefits. Enucleations performed by the ophthalmology service have lower complication rates when compared to enucleations performed by the emergency service. Atropine induces narrowing of the superior and inferior iridocorneal angle and ciliary cleft in normal horse eyes. A positive view of the lifestyle of food animal veterinarians is the strongest predictor for interest in food animal medicine among students: a survey study. Flumazenil has a dose-dependent effect on recovery from midazolam sedation in Rhode Island Red chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1