Correlation Between Coronary Arterial Dominance and the Degree of Coronary Artery Disease Using Computed Tomography Angiography.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-03-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S514510
Haytham Al Ewaidat, Ammar A Oglat, Ali Al Makhadmeh, Tariq Aljarrah, Mohamed Abdalla Eltahir, Khalaf Abdel Azez Al-Masaid, Ahmad W E'layan, Moath Qasim Alawaqla, Ihsan I Hamarneh, Maisoon Mohammed Allouh, Ali Al-Smair
{"title":"Correlation Between Coronary Arterial Dominance and the Degree of Coronary Artery Disease Using Computed Tomography Angiography.","authors":"Haytham Al Ewaidat, Ammar A Oglat, Ali Al Makhadmeh, Tariq Aljarrah, Mohamed Abdalla Eltahir, Khalaf Abdel Azez Al-Masaid, Ahmad W E'layan, Moath Qasim Alawaqla, Ihsan I Hamarneh, Maisoon Mohammed Allouh, Ali Al-Smair","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S514510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used Computed Tomography Angiography to evaluate how coronary artery dominance affects CAD severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 1,000 coronary CTA patients at five private outpatient radiography clinics in Amman, Jordan. Patients of both sexes aged 18 or older with no coronary CTA contraindications were enrolled. Two 10-year-experienced radiologists reviewed all coronary CT images with 64 slices or more without knowing the patients' medical histories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coronary arteries were right, left, or co-dominant. CAD: stenosis. Visual assessment of the lumen diameter rated coronary stenosis as 0%, mild (1-49%), moderate (50-69%), or severe (≥70%). Positive obstructive CAD can be identified when a coronary lesion compromises the lumen by ≥50%. A CAD patient had one, two, three, or four vascular disease. Study outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and one-way ANOVA. Right, left, and co-dominant coronary arteries predominated 85.7%, 11.6%, and 2.7%. Co-dominance caused greater right coronary artery (RCA) issues than left- or right-dominance. 22.2% of co-dominance patients reported positive RCA difficulties, compared to 6.9% and 21.0% of left- and right-dominance patients (p = 0.001). In addition, 14.8% of co-dominance patients had obstructive RCA lesions, compared to 1.7% of left-dominance and 5.3% of right-dominance (p = 0.018). The coronary dominance patterns did not affect LMCA, LAD, LCX, and Ramus blockages (p = 0.846, 0.447, 0.116, and 0.867). Calcium scores averaged 44.4 for right dominance, 41.0 for left, and 86.2 for co-dominance (p = 0.136).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coronary CTA may not provide more risk information than assessing stenosis in patients with normal arteries or non-significant CAD. However, it may aid RCA and obstructive CAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1827-1844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S514510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study used Computed Tomography Angiography to evaluate how coronary artery dominance affects CAD severity.

Methods: We retrospectively examined 1,000 coronary CTA patients at five private outpatient radiography clinics in Amman, Jordan. Patients of both sexes aged 18 or older with no coronary CTA contraindications were enrolled. Two 10-year-experienced radiologists reviewed all coronary CT images with 64 slices or more without knowing the patients' medical histories.

Results: The coronary arteries were right, left, or co-dominant. CAD: stenosis. Visual assessment of the lumen diameter rated coronary stenosis as 0%, mild (1-49%), moderate (50-69%), or severe (≥70%). Positive obstructive CAD can be identified when a coronary lesion compromises the lumen by ≥50%. A CAD patient had one, two, three, or four vascular disease. Study outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. Right, left, and co-dominant coronary arteries predominated 85.7%, 11.6%, and 2.7%. Co-dominance caused greater right coronary artery (RCA) issues than left- or right-dominance. 22.2% of co-dominance patients reported positive RCA difficulties, compared to 6.9% and 21.0% of left- and right-dominance patients (p = 0.001). In addition, 14.8% of co-dominance patients had obstructive RCA lesions, compared to 1.7% of left-dominance and 5.3% of right-dominance (p = 0.018). The coronary dominance patterns did not affect LMCA, LAD, LCX, and Ramus blockages (p = 0.846, 0.447, 0.116, and 0.867). Calcium scores averaged 44.4 for right dominance, 41.0 for left, and 86.2 for co-dominance (p = 0.136).

Conclusion: Coronary CTA may not provide more risk information than assessing stenosis in patients with normal arteries or non-significant CAD. However, it may aid RCA and obstructive CAD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术观察冠状动脉支配与冠状动脉疾病程度之间的相关性。
目的:本研究使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术评估冠状动脉优势如何影响 CAD 的严重程度:本研究使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术评估冠状动脉优势如何影响 CAD 的严重程度:我们回顾性地检查了约旦安曼五家私人放射门诊的 1000 名冠状动脉 CTA 患者。患者年龄均为 18 岁或以上,无冠状动脉 CTA 禁忌症。两名有 10 年经验的放射科医生在不了解患者病史的情况下,对所有 64 片或以上的冠状动脉 CT 图像进行了审查:冠状动脉有右侧、左侧或共支配。CAD:狭窄。目测管腔直径将冠状动脉狭窄分为 0%、轻度(1-49%)、中度(50-69%)或重度(≥70%)。当冠状动脉病变导致管腔狭窄≥50% 时,即可确定为阳性阻塞性 CAD。CAD患者有一种、两种、三种或四种血管疾病。研究结果采用描述性统计、t 检验和单因素方差分析进行评估。右冠状动脉、左冠状动脉和共支配冠状动脉分别占 85.7%、11.6% 和 2.7%。共支配导致的右冠状动脉(RCA)问题大于左或右支配。22.2%的共支配患者报告出现 RCA 阳性问题,而左支配和右支配患者的这一比例分别为 6.9% 和 21.0%(P = 0.001)。此外,14.8% 的共支配患者有阻塞性 RCA 病变,而左支配和右支配患者分别为 1.7% 和 5.3%(P = 0.018)。冠状动脉优势模式对 LMCA、LAD、LCX 和 Ramus 阻塞没有影响(p = 0.846、0.447、0.116 和 0.867)。钙化评分平均为:右侧占优势 44.4 分,左侧占优势 41.0 分,共占优势 86.2 分(p = 0.136):结论:对于动脉正常或无明显CAD的患者,冠状动脉CTA提供的风险信息可能并不比评估狭窄更多。然而,它可以帮助 RCA 和阻塞性 CAD 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Chatbots on Adolescent Mental Health Development: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Strengthening ENT Care in Low Resource Settings: Multidisciplinary and Technology Enabled Strategies to Reduce Preventable Morbidity. Nutritional Management in Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia: A Scoping Review. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Nursing Intervention in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Its Effects on Developmental Quotient and Serum Neurotransmitters. Construction of Nursing Management Protocol for Promoting Tolerance of Enteral Nutrition in Tube-Fed Perioperative Cancer Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1