Evaluation of Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction in Clinical Practice.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112
Xiangmei He, Lan Hou, Jiawei Zhang, Donghui Wang, Liu Yang, Danxi Li, Yuan Qin, Mingkun Zhang, Huan Zhang, Juliang Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Xiangmei He, Lan Hou, Jiawei Zhang, Donghui Wang, Liu Yang, Danxi Li, Yuan Qin, Mingkun Zhang, Huan Zhang, Juliang Zhang","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the clinical outcomes associated with single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April of 2021 to April of 2024, patients undergoing single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction were selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method and to collect information on patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 patients were enrolled in this study, 207 of whom completed follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 95.0%. In terms of surgical safety, the occurrence of flap ischemic problems was 7.8%, and the occurrence of flap necrosis was 3.7%. The occurrence of nipple resection during surgery was 7.4%, and among the 191 patients who had their nipples preserved, the occurrence of nipple ischemia was 7.0%. The occurrence of nipple necrosis was 1.5%, that of infection 10.1%, and that of prosthesis removal 3.9%. Approximately 1.0% of patients experienced metastasis and recurrence during the median 14.3-month follow-up period, as demonstrated by the cumulative sum curve. A cumulative plot analysis indicated that it would require approximately 21 cases for the surgeon to achieve a meaningful reduction in operating time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction is a safe, effective, and visually acceptable surgical technique. Although it provides good oncologic safety, further evidence is required to fully support its use.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"712-722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the clinical outcomes associated with single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.

Methods: From April of 2021 to April of 2024, patients undergoing single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction were selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method and to collect information on patient-reported outcomes.

Results: A total of 218 patients were enrolled in this study, 207 of whom completed follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 95.0%. In terms of surgical safety, the occurrence of flap ischemic problems was 7.8%, and the occurrence of flap necrosis was 3.7%. The occurrence of nipple resection during surgery was 7.4%, and among the 191 patients who had their nipples preserved, the occurrence of nipple ischemia was 7.0%. The occurrence of nipple necrosis was 1.5%, that of infection 10.1%, and that of prosthesis removal 3.9%. Approximately 1.0% of patients experienced metastasis and recurrence during the median 14.3-month follow-up period, as demonstrated by the cumulative sum curve. A cumulative plot analysis indicated that it would require approximately 21 cases for the surgeon to achieve a meaningful reduction in operating time.

Conclusions: Single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction is a safe, effective, and visually acceptable surgical technique. Although it provides good oncologic safety, further evidence is required to fully support its use.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"单孔内窥镜乳头/皮肤保留乳房切除术与胸前乳房假体重建术在临床实践中的评估"。
背景:本研究的目的是概述单孔内窥镜保留乳头乳房切除术合并全乳前植入物重建的临床结果。方法:选取2021年4月至2024年4月接受单孔内窥镜保留乳头/皮肤乳房切除术并全胸前乳房种植体重建的患者,评估该方法的有效性和安全性,并收集患者报告的结果信息。结果:共有218例患者入组,其中207例患者完成随访,随访率为95.0%。手术安全性方面,皮瓣缺血发生率为7.8%,皮瓣坏死发生率为3.7%。术中乳头切除的发生率为7.4%,191例保留乳头的患者中乳头缺血的发生率为7.0%。乳头坏死发生率为1.5%,感染发生率为10.1%,假体切除发生率为3.9%。CUSUM学习曲线显示,在中位14.3个月的随访期间,约有1.0%的患者发生转移和复发。累积图分析表明,外科医生需要大约21例才能实现有意义的手术时间减少。结论:单孔内窥镜保留乳头乳房切除术联合全乳前种植体重建是一种安全、有效、视觉上可接受的手术技术。虽然它具有良好的肿瘤安全性,但需要进一步的证据来充分支持其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Female Genital Mutilation Reconstruction: Surgical Technique. Long-Term Outcomes of Oral Propranolol for Facial Infantile Hemangioma. Barcelona Consensus Paper on Reconstructive Lymphedema Surgery: A Delphi Study. Introducing Preservation Rhinoplasty Principles to Cleft Nasal Surgery: Unveiling the Role of Nasal Ligaments in Infant Anatomy. Intraoperative Real-Time Fluorescence Labeling of Degenerated Facial Nerves with Bevonescein.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1