[The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: mental health trajectories, resilient and vulnerable groups].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s00115-025-01824-8
J M Stoffers-Winterling, H F Wiegand, J Broll, S K Schäfer, K Adorjan, O Tüscher, K Lieb
{"title":"[The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: mental health trajectories, resilient and vulnerable groups].","authors":"J M Stoffers-Winterling, H F Wiegand, J Broll, S K Schäfer, K Adorjan, O Tüscher, K Lieb","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01824-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has probably been the biggest health crisis of the twenty-first century to date. For many people it meant prolonged exposure to psychologically relevant stressors and simultaneously limited coping possibilities.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The aim of this review is to present a summary of the current state of knowledge on the course of mental health in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Using longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional surveys, key findings are summarized and vulnerability and resilience factors are identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large proportions of the German population reported at least temporary effects on their mental well-being in the sense of increased anxiety and depression symptoms as well as reduced life satisfaction, particularly among women, children and adolescents. At the same time, resilient courses were observed in most cases, i.e., most people managed to maintain their mental health during the pandemic. Vulnerability factors included female gender, younger age and financial difficulties. In contrast, a positive appraisal style, cognitive flexibility, social support, self-efficacy beliefs and, at a societal level, social cohesion and institutional trust were reported as important resilience factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The vulnerability and resilience factors identified offer concrete starting points for promoting pandemic preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01824-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has probably been the biggest health crisis of the twenty-first century to date. For many people it meant prolonged exposure to psychologically relevant stressors and simultaneously limited coping possibilities.

Aim of the study: The aim of this review is to present a summary of the current state of knowledge on the course of mental health in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and methods: Using longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional surveys, key findings are summarized and vulnerability and resilience factors are identified.

Results: Large proportions of the German population reported at least temporary effects on their mental well-being in the sense of increased anxiety and depression symptoms as well as reduced life satisfaction, particularly among women, children and adolescents. At the same time, resilient courses were observed in most cases, i.e., most people managed to maintain their mental health during the pandemic. Vulnerability factors included female gender, younger age and financial difficulties. In contrast, a positive appraisal style, cognitive flexibility, social support, self-efficacy beliefs and, at a societal level, social cohesion and institutional trust were reported as important resilience factors.

Discussion: The vulnerability and resilience factors identified offer concrete starting points for promoting pandemic preparedness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[德国的COVID-19大流行:心理健康轨迹、适应力和弱势群体]。
背景:COVID-19 大流行可能是二十一世纪迄今为止最大的健康危机。对许多人来说,这意味着长期暴露于与心理相关的压力之下,同时应对压力的可能性也受到了限制:研究目的:本综述旨在总结 COVID-19 大流行期间德国人心理健康的现状:材料和方法:通过纵向和重复横断面调查,总结了主要研究结果,并确定了易感因素和复原因素:结果:大部分德国人的心理健康至少暂时受到影响,焦虑和抑郁症状增加,生活满意度降低,尤其是妇女、儿童和青少年。与此同时,在大多数情况下,人们都能保持心理健康,也就是说,大多数人都能在大流行期间保持心理健康。弱势因素包括女性性别、年轻和经济困难。相比之下,积极的评价方式、认知灵活性、社会支持、自我效能感以及社会凝聚力和机构信任则是重要的抗逆因素:所确定的脆弱性和复原力因素为促进大流行病防备工作提供了具体的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[The importance of psychiatry in the care and research of Post-COVID]. [DiGA, non-DiGA and realities of practice : A questionnaire study on opportunities and challenges of health apps in the field of mental healthcare]. [Association between temperature, duration of sunshine and suicidal mortality in Germany (2015-2023)]. [Current opioid consumption among younger patients : A comparison between the years 2019 and 2023 in a large addiction clinic in Hamburg]. [Sociodemographic and clinical data among GHB patients-an observational study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1