Failure to rescue in colon surgery

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101118
J.J. Rubio-García , F. Mauri Barberá , C. Villodre Tudela , J. Ferri Romero , M. Marco Gómez , T. Viñas Martínez , C. Gómez Alcázar , M. Romero Simo , J.M. Ramia-Ángel
{"title":"Failure to rescue in colon surgery","authors":"J.J. Rubio-García ,&nbsp;F. Mauri Barberá ,&nbsp;C. Villodre Tudela ,&nbsp;J. Ferri Romero ,&nbsp;M. Marco Gómez ,&nbsp;T. Viñas Martínez ,&nbsp;C. Gómez Alcázar ,&nbsp;M. Romero Simo ,&nbsp;J.M. Ramia-Ángel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major complications (MC) after colorectal surgery are not uncommon and can have serious consequences for patient survival. Failure to rescue (FTR) is an indicator used to measure the capacity for correct management of MC, calculated as the number of patients who die among all those who present MC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study with retrospective data analysis of all patients undergoing scheduled colon cancer surgery at a Spanish university hospital from September-2012 to August-2016. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were recorded. Postoperative complications Clavien–Dindo scores<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->II were considered MC. FTR was defined as death within 90 postoperative days in patients with at least one MC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 564 patients were included, of whom 140 (24.8%) presented MC. Of these, 22 died, representing an FTR rate of 15.7%. Patients with MC had a mean age of 69.6 years, and 30.7% were women. An open approach was used in 81.4%. Compared with survivors, the group of non-survivors presented a higher proportion of ASA III and IV (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008), a higher mean age (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and a higher proportion of anastomotic leaks (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009). Multivariate analysis confirmed that age (OR 1.161; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->000), anastomotic leak (OR 18; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and sepsis of origin other than anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal collection (OR 26; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) were significantly associated with FTR as independent factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The FTR rate after colectomy in our series was similar or slightly lower than other series. Age, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis of non-abdominal origin were independent factors associated with FTR. We contend that FTR is an excellent indicator of a center's ability to resolve MC. It is particularly useful for implementing measures to ensure effective treatment of MC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 101118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major complications (MC) after colorectal surgery are not uncommon and can have serious consequences for patient survival. Failure to rescue (FTR) is an indicator used to measure the capacity for correct management of MC, calculated as the number of patients who die among all those who present MC.

Methods

Observational study with retrospective data analysis of all patients undergoing scheduled colon cancer surgery at a Spanish university hospital from September-2012 to August-2016. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were recorded. Postoperative complications Clavien–Dindo scores > II were considered MC. FTR was defined as death within 90 postoperative days in patients with at least one MC.

Results

A total of 564 patients were included, of whom 140 (24.8%) presented MC. Of these, 22 died, representing an FTR rate of 15.7%. Patients with MC had a mean age of 69.6 years, and 30.7% were women. An open approach was used in 81.4%. Compared with survivors, the group of non-survivors presented a higher proportion of ASA III and IV (P = 0.008), a higher mean age (P = 0.001) and a higher proportion of anastomotic leaks (P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis confirmed that age (OR 1.161; P = 000), anastomotic leak (OR 18; P = 0.001) and sepsis of origin other than anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal collection (OR 26; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with FTR as independent factors.

Conclusion

The FTR rate after colectomy in our series was similar or slightly lower than other series. Age, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis of non-abdominal origin were independent factors associated with FTR. We contend that FTR is an excellent indicator of a center's ability to resolve MC. It is particularly useful for implementing measures to ensure effective treatment of MC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠手术抢救失败
结直肠手术后的重大并发症(MC)并不罕见,并可能对患者的生存造成严重后果。抢救失败(Failure to rescue, FTR)是衡量MC正确管理能力的指标,以出现MC的患者中死亡的人数计算。方法观察性研究,回顾性分析2012年9月至2016年8月在西班牙某大学医院接受结肠癌手术的所有患者。记录术前、术中、术后各项指标。术后并发症Clavien-Dindo评分;结果共纳入564例患者,其中140例(24.8%)出现MC,其中22例死亡,FTR率为15.7%。MC患者的平均年龄为69.6岁,其中30.7%为女性。81.4%的患者采用开放入路。与存活组相比,非存活组ASA III级和IV级比例更高(P = 0.008),平均年龄更高(P = 0.001),吻合口漏比例更高(P = 0.009)。多因素分析证实年龄(OR 1.161;P = 000),吻合口漏(OR 18;P = 0.001)和除吻合口漏或腹腔内收集外的脓毒症(or 26;P = 0.001)与FTR作为独立因素显著相关。结论本组结肠切除术后FTR发生率与其他组相近或略低。年龄、吻合口漏和非腹腔脓毒症是与FTR相关的独立因素。我们认为,FTR是一个很好的指标,一个中心解决MC的能力。它是特别有用的实施措施,以确保有效治疗MC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Cuando la autonomía legal queda huérfana de apoyos: el caso Tina y la Ley de eutanasia Análisis de la experiencia en la atención recibida por los profesionales y los servicios sanitarios de personas con pluripatología Evaluación de la comunicación y transferencia de la información clínica y de cuidados en un hospital de tercer nivel Drug policy in the Trump era: Expected and observed consequences for the United States and Europe. Implementation of ambulatory health care quality standards in an Occupational Mutual Insurance Company.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1