Sex differences in pelvis-knee-foot coordination and variability among recreational runners

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112666
Rodrigo Paiva , Leonardo Metsavaht , Eliane Guadagnin , Lorran Cerutti , Gustavo Leporace
{"title":"Sex differences in pelvis-knee-foot coordination and variability among recreational runners","authors":"Rodrigo Paiva ,&nbsp;Leonardo Metsavaht ,&nbsp;Eliane Guadagnin ,&nbsp;Lorran Cerutti ,&nbsp;Gustavo Leporace","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Men and women exhibit distinct motor strategies while running, yet their impact on intersegmental coordination remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate differences between male and female recreational runners in intersegmental coordination and coordination variability among foot frontal plane (FP), knee sagittal plane (SP), and pelvis FP. Seventy-three recreational runners (31 females; 20–40 years) participated. Intersegmental coordination patterns, coordination variability, and the angles of foot FP, knee SP, and pelvis FP during stance phase were assessed using a motion analysis system and a modified vector coding technique. Groups were compared using unpaired t-tests and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). During early stance, women exhibited higher antiphase distal dominance (AD) compared to men for pelvis FP – foot FP (<em>p</em> = 0.03) and pelvis FP – knee SP (<em>p</em> = 0.05). No significant differences were observed during midstance. In late stance, women demonstrated greater in-phase proximal dominance for pelvis FP – foot FP (<em>p</em> = 0.001), lower in-phase distal dominance (<em>p</em> = 0.02) and AD (<em>p</em> = 0.01) for pelvis FP – foot FP, and lower AD for pelvis FP – knee SP (<em>p</em> = 0.01), compared to men. No differences were found for knee SP – foot FP. SPM revealed no significant differences in coordination variability. This study identified significant sex differences in intersegmental coordination, with women showing greater pelvic dominance and men exhibiting increased foot reliance during propulsion. These findings underscore the importance of sex-specific approaches in optimizing running mechanics and injury prevention strategies. Despite these coordination differences, the similarity in coordination variability between sexes highlights the complexity of biomechanical adaptations in running.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 112666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Men and women exhibit distinct motor strategies while running, yet their impact on intersegmental coordination remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate differences between male and female recreational runners in intersegmental coordination and coordination variability among foot frontal plane (FP), knee sagittal plane (SP), and pelvis FP. Seventy-three recreational runners (31 females; 20–40 years) participated. Intersegmental coordination patterns, coordination variability, and the angles of foot FP, knee SP, and pelvis FP during stance phase were assessed using a motion analysis system and a modified vector coding technique. Groups were compared using unpaired t-tests and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). During early stance, women exhibited higher antiphase distal dominance (AD) compared to men for pelvis FP – foot FP (p = 0.03) and pelvis FP – knee SP (p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed during midstance. In late stance, women demonstrated greater in-phase proximal dominance for pelvis FP – foot FP (p = 0.001), lower in-phase distal dominance (p = 0.02) and AD (p = 0.01) for pelvis FP – foot FP, and lower AD for pelvis FP – knee SP (p = 0.01), compared to men. No differences were found for knee SP – foot FP. SPM revealed no significant differences in coordination variability. This study identified significant sex differences in intersegmental coordination, with women showing greater pelvic dominance and men exhibiting increased foot reliance during propulsion. These findings underscore the importance of sex-specific approaches in optimizing running mechanics and injury prevention strategies. Despite these coordination differences, the similarity in coordination variability between sexes highlights the complexity of biomechanical adaptations in running.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
休闲跑步者骨盆-膝-足协调性和变异性的性别差异
男性和女性在跑步时表现出不同的运动策略,但他们对节间协调的影响仍不清楚。本研究的目的是调查男女休闲跑步者在节间协调性以及脚掌正面(FP)、膝关节矢状面(SP)和骨盆 FP 之间的协调变异性方面的差异。73 名休闲跑步者(31 名女性;20-40 岁)参加了此次活动。采用运动分析系统和改良的矢量编码技术,对站立阶段的节间协调模式、协调变异性以及脚掌前平面、膝盖矢状面和骨盆前平面的角度进行了评估。使用非配对 t 检验和统计参数映射(SPM)对各组进行比较。在早期站立期间,与男性相比,女性在骨盆 FP - 脚 FP(p = 0.03)和骨盆 FP - 膝关节 SP(p = 0.05)方面表现出更高的反相远端优势(AD)。中段站立时没有观察到明显差异。在晚期站立中,与男性相比,女性在骨盆 FP - 足 FP 中表现出更大的近相优势(p = 0.001),在骨盆 FP - 足 FP 中表现出较低的远相优势(p = 0.02)和 AD(p = 0.01),在骨盆 FP - 膝 SP 中表现出较低的 AD(p = 0.01)。膝关节 SP - 足 FP 没有发现差异。SPM 显示协调变异性无明显差异。这项研究发现,在节间协调方面存在明显的性别差异,女性在推进过程中表现出更大的骨盆优势,而男性则表现出更多的足部依赖。这些发现强调了针对不同性别的方法在优化跑步力学和预防损伤策略中的重要性。尽管存在这些协调差异,但两性之间协调变异的相似性凸显了跑步中生物力学适应的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of stent retriever behavior at deployment and retrieval during mechanical thrombectomy A critical orientation on muscle marker placement: Multiple angles to consider Assessment of fluid ingress into the graft-host interface of osteochondral grafts and synthetic scaffolds under cyclic axial loading in a tibio-femoral model Hindlimb unloading results in accelerated bone loss compared to aging in select bone compartments of female murine femurs Effects of custom-made foot orthoses on lower limb kinematics and kinetics during step-up and step-down tasks in individuals with progressive collapsing foot deformity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1