Effectiveness of pitcher and bottle filters to remove poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from drinking water

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179327
Magdalena Zarębska , Sylwia Bajkacz , Katarzyna Malorna , Kamila Torchała
{"title":"Effectiveness of pitcher and bottle filters to remove poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from drinking water","authors":"Magdalena Zarębska ,&nbsp;Sylwia Bajkacz ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Malorna ,&nbsp;Kamila Torchała","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The occurrence of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water poses significant health risks. In this study the effectiveness of 12 popular pitcher and 5 bottle filters in removing 25 fluorinated contaminants from drinking water was evaluated. Twenty individual PFAS, outlined in Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184 as “Sum of PFAS” and 5 emerging PFAS, were considered. The average efficiency of PFAS removal by the tested filters ranged from 31 % to 99 % for the sum of 20 legacy compounds, and from 19 % to 99 % for emerging ones. Over 80 % reduction was recorded for 9 tested filters. In most examined cases, the filter efficiency increased with alkyl chain length for both perfluorinated carboxylic and sulfonic acids. Four filters were found to reduce the concentration of Σ<sub>20</sub>PFAS from 2000 ng/L to &lt;100 ng/L, meeting the Directive's limit. Additionally, the best filtration bed decreased the sum of PFAS from 100 ng/L to &lt;6 ng/L for model water and from 25 ng/L to 0.6 ng/L for real water, indicating ≥94 % removal efficiency in both cases. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area (S<sub>BET</sub>) and micropore volume were key factors influencing PFAS removal efficiency in the pitcher filter. The obtained results highlight important information regarding drinking water quality and safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"976 ","pages":"Article 179327"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725009635","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occurrence of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water poses significant health risks. In this study the effectiveness of 12 popular pitcher and 5 bottle filters in removing 25 fluorinated contaminants from drinking water was evaluated. Twenty individual PFAS, outlined in Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184 as “Sum of PFAS” and 5 emerging PFAS, were considered. The average efficiency of PFAS removal by the tested filters ranged from 31 % to 99 % for the sum of 20 legacy compounds, and from 19 % to 99 % for emerging ones. Over 80 % reduction was recorded for 9 tested filters. In most examined cases, the filter efficiency increased with alkyl chain length for both perfluorinated carboxylic and sulfonic acids. Four filters were found to reduce the concentration of Σ20PFAS from 2000 ng/L to <100 ng/L, meeting the Directive's limit. Additionally, the best filtration bed decreased the sum of PFAS from 100 ng/L to <6 ng/L for model water and from 25 ng/L to 0.6 ng/L for real water, indicating ≥94 % removal efficiency in both cases. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area (SBET) and micropore volume were key factors influencing PFAS removal efficiency in the pitcher filter. The obtained results highlight important information regarding drinking water quality and safety.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罐状和瓶状过滤器去除饮用水中聚氟烷基和全氟烷基物质(PFAS)的有效性
饮用水中多氟和全氟烷基物质(PFAS)的存在对健康构成重大威胁。本研究评估了12种常用的水罐过滤器和5种瓶装过滤器去除饮用水中25种含氟污染物的效果。考虑了饮用水指令2020/2184中概述为“PFAS总和”的20个单独的PFAS和5个新出现的PFAS。经测试的过滤器对20种遗留化合物的PFAS去除的平均效率为31%至99%,对新出现的化合物去除的平均效率为19%至99%。在9个测试过滤器中记录了超过80%的减少。在大多数检测情况下,对于全氟羧酸和磺酸,过滤效率随着烷基链长度的增加而增加。发现四个过滤器将Σ20PFAS的浓度从2000 ng/L降低到100 ng/L,符合指令的限值。此外,最佳过滤床将模拟水的PFAS总量从100 ng/L降低到6 ng/L,将真实水的PFAS总量从25 ng/L降低到0.6 ng/L,两种情况下的去除率均≥94%。比表面积(SBET)和微孔体积是影响罐状过滤器去除PFAS效率的关键因素。所得结果突出了有关饮用水质量和安全的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of acetamiprid toxicity on Tubifex tubifex: Cytotoxic, physiological, histopathological, and ultrastructural approach Initiating environmental microplastics analysis: A review and planning guide with practical insights from laboratory implementation Thermal stress precludes the multigenerational build-up of carbamate tolerance in Daphnia magna by offsetting increased antioxidant defenses Challenges for carbon crediting in Zostera marina (eelgrass) meadows Microbial Lossen rearrangement: Promise and pitfalls in plastic bioremediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1