Green, innovative, and unfair: The case of unjust energy transitions and civic resistance and opposition in Portugal

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104068
Inês Campos , Sérgio Maraschin , Kaya Maria Schwemmlein
{"title":"Green, innovative, and unfair: The case of unjust energy transitions and civic resistance and opposition in Portugal","authors":"Inês Campos ,&nbsp;Sérgio Maraschin ,&nbsp;Kaya Maria Schwemmlein","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the intersection of degrowth and energy justice, investigating how decarbonisation goals and energy policy pathways may perpetuate continuous economic growth while exacerbating social justice issues, such as inequality, lack of distributive and procedural justice, and shared responsibility for environmental concerns. In Alentejo, Portugal, the construction of low-carbon infrastructure and large-scale renewable energy production facilities for industrial expansion has sparked the rise of new civic movements and local opposition. Using a sociology of expectations approach and qualitative thematic analysis, this study examines data gathered through participant observation and documentary analysis to understand the diverse expectations of the stakeholders involved. The findings reveal that the depletion of natural resources and cultural heritage in the region is closely linked to a lack of transparency and accountability from both governance structures and private companies. Additionally, this research highlights several implications for energy justice and degrowth and their interconnections. By emphasising these aspects, the paper illustrates how the technological transformation of natural landscapes is often supported by tokenistic participation processes that largely overlook the concerns of local communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104068"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of degrowth and energy justice, investigating how decarbonisation goals and energy policy pathways may perpetuate continuous economic growth while exacerbating social justice issues, such as inequality, lack of distributive and procedural justice, and shared responsibility for environmental concerns. In Alentejo, Portugal, the construction of low-carbon infrastructure and large-scale renewable energy production facilities for industrial expansion has sparked the rise of new civic movements and local opposition. Using a sociology of expectations approach and qualitative thematic analysis, this study examines data gathered through participant observation and documentary analysis to understand the diverse expectations of the stakeholders involved. The findings reveal that the depletion of natural resources and cultural heritage in the region is closely linked to a lack of transparency and accountability from both governance structures and private companies. Additionally, this research highlights several implications for energy justice and degrowth and their interconnections. By emphasising these aspects, the paper illustrates how the technological transformation of natural landscapes is often supported by tokenistic participation processes that largely overlook the concerns of local communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色、创新和不公平:葡萄牙不公正的能源转型与公民抵制和反对的案例
本研究探讨了去增长和能源正义的交集,调查了脱碳目标和能源政策途径如何在加剧社会正义问题(如不平等、缺乏分配和程序正义以及对环境问题的共同责任)的同时,使持续的经济增长永续下去。在葡萄牙阿连特茹,低碳基础设施的建设和大规模可再生能源生产设施的工业扩张引发了新的公民运动和当地反对的兴起。本研究采用期望社会学方法和定性专题分析,通过参与观察和文献分析收集数据,以了解所涉及的利益相关者的不同期望。研究结果表明,该地区自然资源和文化遗产的枯竭与治理结构和私营公司缺乏透明度和问责制密切相关。此外,本研究强调了能源正义和去生长及其相互联系的几个含义。通过强调这些方面,本文说明了自然景观的技术改造通常是如何通过象征性的参与过程来支持的,而这些过程在很大程度上忽视了当地社区的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Renewable transition building on resettlement society: The case of Inner Mongolia, China Energy transition in the global south: Donor bargains and the future of the aid machine Valuing the wider benefits of net zero: Conceptual foundations of new assessment frameworks in the United Kingdom The flexibility divide—How socioeconomic conditions shape grid-based flexibility in Germany Eco-equalities for a Just Transition to Net Zero: Applying an equality mainstreaming framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1