You are worth my tipping: Why do people voluntarily pay for User-Generated-Content on social media platforms?

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101501
Yuejun Wang , Ding Wu , Xiangbin Yan
{"title":"You are worth my tipping: Why do people voluntarily pay for User-Generated-Content on social media platforms?","authors":"Yuejun Wang ,&nbsp;Ding Wu ,&nbsp;Xiangbin Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media platforms have begun to widely adopt the Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) pricing model to sell User-Generated-Content (UGC). However, it is still under-explored why social media users voluntarily pay for UGC even if they can easily free-ride under PWYW conditions. In this paper, we theoretically derive and examine a model to understand users’ PWYW behaviors for UGC on social media. Drawing on social exchange theory, we treat perceived worth as the core antecedent and analyze the benefits and costs associated with users’ PWYW behaviors. In addition, we also propose that users’ PWYW experience and social endorsement are important contextual factors and examine their roles in shaping users’ PWYW decisions. To test the research model, we conducted an online survey study, and the results revealed two major findings. <em>First</em>, social media users mainly value the reciprocity for product and pleasure brought by PWYW behaviors but are also concerned about the perceived opportunity cost and inconvenience of e-payment process, based on which they form perceived worth that further determines their PWYW frequency. <em>Second,</em> social media users’ PWYW experience and social endorsement also influence their PWYW frequency, and the effects are partially and fully mediated by perceived worth, respectively. Our research reveals the crucial factors that motivate social media users’ PWYW engagement in UGC consumption and lays the foundation for future theoretical research and practical work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101501"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422325000262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media platforms have begun to widely adopt the Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) pricing model to sell User-Generated-Content (UGC). However, it is still under-explored why social media users voluntarily pay for UGC even if they can easily free-ride under PWYW conditions. In this paper, we theoretically derive and examine a model to understand users’ PWYW behaviors for UGC on social media. Drawing on social exchange theory, we treat perceived worth as the core antecedent and analyze the benefits and costs associated with users’ PWYW behaviors. In addition, we also propose that users’ PWYW experience and social endorsement are important contextual factors and examine their roles in shaping users’ PWYW decisions. To test the research model, we conducted an online survey study, and the results revealed two major findings. First, social media users mainly value the reciprocity for product and pleasure brought by PWYW behaviors but are also concerned about the perceived opportunity cost and inconvenience of e-payment process, based on which they form perceived worth that further determines their PWYW frequency. Second, social media users’ PWYW experience and social endorsement also influence their PWYW frequency, and the effects are partially and fully mediated by perceived worth, respectively. Our research reveals the crucial factors that motivate social media users’ PWYW engagement in UGC consumption and lays the foundation for future theoretical research and practical work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你值得我给小费:为什么人们会自愿为社交媒体平台上的用户生成内容付费?
社交媒体平台已开始广泛采用 "按需付费"(PWYW)的定价模式来销售用户生成内容(UGC)。然而,对于社交媒体用户为什么会自愿为 UGC 付费(即使在 PWYW 条件下他们可以轻松免费搭车),我们的研究还不够深入。在本文中,我们从理论上推导并研究了一个模型,以理解用户在社交媒体上为 UGC 付费的行为。借鉴社会交换理论,我们将感知价值作为核心前因,并分析了与用户 "PWYW "行为相关的收益和成本。此外,我们还提出用户的惠益行为体验和社会认可是重要的情境因素,并研究了它们在影响用户惠益行为决策中的作用。为了检验研究模型,我们进行了一项在线调查研究,结果显示了两大发现。首先,社交媒体用户主要看重 "想买就买 "行为带来的产品互惠和愉悦,但同时也关注电子支付过程中的感知机会成本和不便,在此基础上形成的感知价值进一步决定了他们的 "想买就买 "频率。其次,社交媒体用户的惠益行为体验和社会认可也会影响他们的惠益行为频率,而这两种效应分别部分和完全受到感知价值的中介作用。我们的研究揭示了促使社交媒体用户参与 UGC 消费的关键因素,为今后的理论研究和实践工作奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
A scalable framework for ranking integration in large-scale online reviews: Integrating clustering and multi-attribute decision-making Direct or agency? Manufacturer encroachment under platform’s data-driven marketing Editorial Board From clicks to context: A heterogeneous graph framework for diagnosing consumer shopping goals and personalizing retail strategy Payment innovation diffusion among merchants: An integrated view using a tri-level hybrid method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1