Cultural Differences in Thinking Outside of Box: The Influence of Context-Independent Versus Context-Dependent Thinking Styles on Creative Task Performance

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Creative Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1002/jocb.70017
Wenxia Guo, Etayankara Muralidharan, Saurav Pathak
{"title":"Cultural Differences in Thinking Outside of Box: The Influence of Context-Independent Versus Context-Dependent Thinking Styles on Creative Task Performance","authors":"Wenxia Guo,&nbsp;Etayankara Muralidharan,&nbsp;Saurav Pathak","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Previous research has examined cross-cultural influences on creative performance. Findings of this line of inquiry are, however, not consistent. While some scholars suggest that individuals from Western cultures, who tend to apply context-independent thinking styles, produce more novel ideas given a cognitive task than individuals from Eastern cultures, who tend to apply context-dependent thinking styles, others do not find such differences. Our research attempts to explore this dilemma and identify conditions that drive cross-cultural differences in creativity. Overall, our findings suggest that cross-cultural differences in creativity exist, but they may be contingent on the nature of the cognitive tasks that may restrict individuals' cognitive flexibility. In particular, the current research shows that the more the cognitive tasks fit individual differences (context-independent vs. context-dependent thinking styles), the better the task performance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has examined cross-cultural influences on creative performance. Findings of this line of inquiry are, however, not consistent. While some scholars suggest that individuals from Western cultures, who tend to apply context-independent thinking styles, produce more novel ideas given a cognitive task than individuals from Eastern cultures, who tend to apply context-dependent thinking styles, others do not find such differences. Our research attempts to explore this dilemma and identify conditions that drive cross-cultural differences in creativity. Overall, our findings suggest that cross-cultural differences in creativity exist, but they may be contingent on the nature of the cognitive tasks that may restrict individuals' cognitive flexibility. In particular, the current research shows that the more the cognitive tasks fit individual differences (context-independent vs. context-dependent thinking styles), the better the task performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思维模式外的文化差异:情境独立与情境依赖思维方式对创造性任务表现的影响
之前的研究考察了跨文化对创造性表现的影响。然而,这一调查的结果并不一致。虽然一些学者认为,在给定的认知任务中,来自西方文化的个体(他们倾向于采用情境独立的思维方式)比来自东方文化的个体(他们倾向于采用情境独立的思维方式)产生更多新颖的想法,但其他人并没有发现这种差异。我们的研究试图探索这一困境,并确定驱动创造力跨文化差异的条件。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,创造力的跨文化差异是存在的,但它们可能取决于可能限制个人认知灵活性的认知任务的性质。特别是,目前的研究表明,认知任务越符合个体差异(情境独立与情境依赖的思维方式),任务表现越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Imagination: Developing and Validating the Young Children's Inventory of Creative Activities The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment: A Welcome Opportunity to Explore the Mechanics of Flexibility Scoring Cognitive Conflict in Rule Violation and Creativity: Evidence for a Shared Cognitive Basis Do Fans of Violent Stories Show a Higher Potential for Creative Harm? True Crime as a Stimulating Environment for Malevolent Creativity Using Immersive Technology to Understand the Effect of Emotional Shift on Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1