The multiple roles of religious actors in advancing a sustainable future

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Ambio Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0
Jens Koehrsen, Christopher D. Ives
{"title":"The multiple roles of religious actors in advancing a sustainable future","authors":"Jens Koehrsen,&nbsp;Christopher D. Ives","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Religious actors have great potential for influencing transformation processes toward environmentally sustainable societies. Influencing peoples’ worldviews, values, and group norms, they can promote (or block) pro-environmental attitudes, lifestyles, and political decision-making. Yet, current scholarship is ambivalent about religion’s contribution to environmental sustainability. This perspective article outlines various roles religious actors can assume in sustainability transitions. We suggest a systematization of four roles—(1) pioneering, (2) path-following, (3) passive observing, and (4) prohibiting change—and portray five conditions that influence and catalyze these roles—(a) theological commitment, (b) internal support, (c) resources, (d) social and political influence, and (e) wider societal conditions. Generating this conceptual clarity is crucial as it allows researchers and policy actors to recognize the diversity of religious expressions with respect to sustainability action, and grasp the conditions under which religious actors are best equipped to address sustainability challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"54 8","pages":"1318 - 1333"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religious actors have great potential for influencing transformation processes toward environmentally sustainable societies. Influencing peoples’ worldviews, values, and group norms, they can promote (or block) pro-environmental attitudes, lifestyles, and political decision-making. Yet, current scholarship is ambivalent about religion’s contribution to environmental sustainability. This perspective article outlines various roles religious actors can assume in sustainability transitions. We suggest a systematization of four roles—(1) pioneering, (2) path-following, (3) passive observing, and (4) prohibiting change—and portray five conditions that influence and catalyze these roles—(a) theological commitment, (b) internal support, (c) resources, (d) social and political influence, and (e) wider societal conditions. Generating this conceptual clarity is crucial as it allows researchers and policy actors to recognize the diversity of religious expressions with respect to sustainability action, and grasp the conditions under which religious actors are best equipped to address sustainability challenges.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教行为者在推进可持续未来中的多重作用。
宗教行为者在影响环境可持续社会的转型进程方面具有巨大潜力。通过影响人们的世界观、价值观和群体规范,他们可以促进(或阻止)有利于环境的态度、生活方式和政治决策。然而,目前的学术界对宗教对环境可持续性的贡献持矛盾态度。本视角文章概述了宗教行为者在可持续发展转型中可能扮演的各种角色。我们建议将四种角色系统化--(1) 开拓者,(2) 循循善诱,(3) 被动观察,(4) 禁止变革,并描绘了影响和催化这些角色的五个条件--(a) 神学承诺,(b) 内部支持,(c) 资源,(d) 社会和政治影响,(e) 更广泛的社会条件。形成这种清晰的概念至关重要,因为它可以让研究人员和政策参与者认识到在可持续发展行动方面宗教表达方式的多样性,并把握宗教参与者最有能力应对可持续发展挑战的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
期刊最新文献
How do members of the public feel about novel ecosystem interventions? A longitudinal study of emotional responses to restoration and adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef. Decarbonising homes and the in-between: Intersections of visible and latent climate-wise housing and mobility. Correction: Climate Relief Maps: A methodological framework for exploring everyday experiences of climate change through an intersectional lens. Agroecology in Zimbabwe: A country-level review with regional lessons for Southern African Development Community (SADC). Local Criollo people's perceptions of changes in wild food consumption in a deforestation frontier in the Argentine Dry Chaco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1