Characterization of surgical flow disruptions in orthopedic surgery using a human factors approach

Asfandyar Khan , Scott A. Shappell , Albert J. Boquet
{"title":"Characterization of surgical flow disruptions in orthopedic surgery using a human factors approach","authors":"Asfandyar Khan ,&nbsp;Scott A. Shappell ,&nbsp;Albert J. Boquet","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Efficient and safe perioperative care is critical to optimizing surgical outcomes and reducing preventable errors. Orthopedic procedures, ranging from minimally invasive techniques to complex surgeries, place significant cognitive and physical demands on surgical teams. Disruptions in workflow can compromise efficiency, coordination, and patient safety. This study aimed to systematically identify and categorize surgical flow disruptions to inform quality improvement efforts.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Forty orthopedic surgeries were observed. A human factors taxonomy was used to classify disruptions, and descriptive statistical analysis was applied.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Of the 2343 total disruptions observed, Interruptions (46.39 %) were the most frequent, followed by communication failures (33.25 %), coordination challenges (13.19 %), layout inefficiencies (5.25 %), equipment issues (1.20 %), and usability concerns (0.73 %). This translated into one disruption every 3.7 min for the 40 surgeries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Addressing surgical flow disruptions proactively can enhance perioperative efficiency, safety, and team coordination. This study presents system vulnerabilities, enabling the possibility of shifting the focus from reactive error analysis to proactive mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603025000299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Efficient and safe perioperative care is critical to optimizing surgical outcomes and reducing preventable errors. Orthopedic procedures, ranging from minimally invasive techniques to complex surgeries, place significant cognitive and physical demands on surgical teams. Disruptions in workflow can compromise efficiency, coordination, and patient safety. This study aimed to systematically identify and categorize surgical flow disruptions to inform quality improvement efforts.

Method

Forty orthopedic surgeries were observed. A human factors taxonomy was used to classify disruptions, and descriptive statistical analysis was applied.

Result

Of the 2343 total disruptions observed, Interruptions (46.39 %) were the most frequent, followed by communication failures (33.25 %), coordination challenges (13.19 %), layout inefficiencies (5.25 %), equipment issues (1.20 %), and usability concerns (0.73 %). This translated into one disruption every 3.7 min for the 40 surgeries.

Conclusions

Addressing surgical flow disruptions proactively can enhance perioperative efficiency, safety, and team coordination. This study presents system vulnerabilities, enabling the possibility of shifting the focus from reactive error analysis to proactive mitigation strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用人为因素方法分析骨科手术中手术血流中断的特征
背景:有效和安全的围手术期护理是优化手术效果和减少可预防错误的关键。骨科手术,从微创技术到复杂的手术,对外科团队的认知和身体都有很大的要求。工作流程中的中断会影响效率、协调和患者安全。本研究旨在系统地识别和分类手术血流中断,为质量改进工作提供信息。方法对40例骨科手术进行观察。采用人为因素分类法对干扰进行分类,并采用描述性统计分析。结果在观察到的2343次中断中,中断(46.39%)是最常见的,其次是通信故障(33.25%)、协调挑战(13.19%)、布局效率低下(5.25%)、设备问题(1.20%)和可用性问题(0.73%)。这意味着在40次手术中,每3.7分钟就有一次中断。结论主动应对手术流程中断可提高围手术期效率、安全性和团队协作能力。本研究提出了系统漏洞,使重点从被动错误分析转移到主动缓解策略的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
“Eyes wide open”: A consciousness-based cultural model for infection control in the operating room A study of preoperative triggers to prospectively identify cases at risk of adverse events in non-operating room anesthesia Does delirium cause postoperative pneumonia in patients after esophageal cancer surgery? Clinical and structural outcomes of hybrid operating rooms in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review Effects of bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes on recovery quality in patients undergoing lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1