Effects of particle size fractions and clay content for determination of soil organic carbon and soil organic matter

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2025.106568
Matthew Tiller , Lucy Reading , Les Dawes , Marc Miska , Prasanna Egodawatta
{"title":"Effects of particle size fractions and clay content for determination of soil organic carbon and soil organic matter","authors":"Matthew Tiller ,&nbsp;Lucy Reading ,&nbsp;Les Dawes ,&nbsp;Marc Miska ,&nbsp;Prasanna Egodawatta","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic matter (SOM) and soil organic carbon (SOC) influence soil behaviour, quality, and applications. While conversion equations exist, the GlobalSoilMap Science Committee (2015) determined that no universal equation is viable due to regional soil variability. Instead, region-specific equations are required. This study presents SOM and SOC data from 75 sites for soils at 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm depth intervals, aligning with GlobalSoilMap specifications, allowing for global applicability of research findings. While this study develops region-specific SOM-SOC conversion equations for southeastern Queensland, the findings contribute to the broader understanding of how soil properties influence SOM-SOC relationships. The methods used, particularly clustered regression based on clay content and particle size, can be applied in other regions worldwide to refine soil carbon estimates in diverse landscapes. Regression analysis showed that the selected particle size fractions (&lt;2 mm vs. &lt;0.5 mm) had minimal effect on the dry combustion (DC) method but significantly influenced loss on ignition (LOI) results. A regression slope of 0.827 indicated that &lt; 2 mm samples yielded higher SOM values than &lt; 0.5 mm samples, introducing uncertainty in LOI-derived estimates. Clay content further impacted conversions: samples with &lt; 15 % clay produced robust equations with high coefficients of determination, whereas those with &gt; 15 % clay exhibited increased variance, lower slopes, and reduced accuracy, necessitating caution in their application. This research improves understanding of SOM-SOC relationships across key depth intervals and particle size fractions. It highlights the influence of clay content and particle size on LOI and DC methods, refining the accuracy of SOM and SOC estimation. These findings are valuable globally for soil science, agriculture, hydrology, and engineering, aiding more precise soil carbon assessments in various environmental and land management applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106568"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) and soil organic carbon (SOC) influence soil behaviour, quality, and applications. While conversion equations exist, the GlobalSoilMap Science Committee (2015) determined that no universal equation is viable due to regional soil variability. Instead, region-specific equations are required. This study presents SOM and SOC data from 75 sites for soils at 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm depth intervals, aligning with GlobalSoilMap specifications, allowing for global applicability of research findings. While this study develops region-specific SOM-SOC conversion equations for southeastern Queensland, the findings contribute to the broader understanding of how soil properties influence SOM-SOC relationships. The methods used, particularly clustered regression based on clay content and particle size, can be applied in other regions worldwide to refine soil carbon estimates in diverse landscapes. Regression analysis showed that the selected particle size fractions (<2 mm vs. <0.5 mm) had minimal effect on the dry combustion (DC) method but significantly influenced loss on ignition (LOI) results. A regression slope of 0.827 indicated that < 2 mm samples yielded higher SOM values than < 0.5 mm samples, introducing uncertainty in LOI-derived estimates. Clay content further impacted conversions: samples with < 15 % clay produced robust equations with high coefficients of determination, whereas those with > 15 % clay exhibited increased variance, lower slopes, and reduced accuracy, necessitating caution in their application. This research improves understanding of SOM-SOC relationships across key depth intervals and particle size fractions. It highlights the influence of clay content and particle size on LOI and DC methods, refining the accuracy of SOM and SOC estimation. These findings are valuable globally for soil science, agriculture, hydrology, and engineering, aiding more precise soil carbon assessments in various environmental and land management applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粒度、组分和粘土含量对土壤有机碳和土壤有机质测定的影响
土壤有机质(SOM)和土壤有机碳(SOC)影响土壤的行为、质量和应用。虽然存在转换方程,但GlobalSoilMap科学委员会(2015)确定,由于区域土壤变异,没有通用方程是可行的。相反,需要特定区域的方程。本研究提供了75个站点土壤在0-5 cm和5-15 cm深度区间的SOM和SOC数据,与GlobalSoilMap规范保持一致,使研究结果具有全球适用性。虽然本研究为昆士兰东南部开发了特定区域的SOM-SOC转换方程,但研究结果有助于更广泛地了解土壤性质如何影响SOM-SOC关系。所使用的方法,特别是基于粘土含量和粒度的聚类回归,可以在世界其他地区应用,以改进不同景观下的土壤碳估算。回归分析表明,选择的粒径分数(<2 mm vs <0.5 mm)对干燃烧(DC)方法的影响最小,但对着火损失(LOI)结果有显著影响。回归斜率为0.827表明<; 2 mm样品的SOM值高于<; 0.5 mm样品,这在loi估算中引入了不确定性。粘土含量进一步影响了转换:含有<; 15 %粘土的样品产生了具有高决定系数的稳健方程,而含有>; 15 %粘土的样品则表现出较大的方差,较低的斜率和较低的精度,因此在应用时需要谨慎。这项研究提高了对SOM-SOC在关键深度区间和粒度分数之间关系的理解。它突出了粘土含量和粒度对LOI和DC方法的影响,提高了SOM和SOC估算的准确性。这些发现对土壤科学、农业、水文学和工程具有全球价值,有助于在各种环境和土地管理应用中进行更精确的土壤碳评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Estimating soil hydraulic conductivity by Inverse Laplace Transform A novel sample selection strategy for instance-based transfer learning in local soil organic carbon estimation Soil crack healing, recurrence and the temporal persistence of preferential flow under wet-dry cycles revealed by deep-learning image analysis and breakthrough curves Threshold effects of resistant-layer thickness on gully development in the black soil region of Northeast China Hydrophobic high-frequency vibration collaborative strategy for reducing resistance and soil adhesion of tillage tools in lime concretion black soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1