A field test of the EMS LiftKit: Validating its usability, usefulness, and desirability

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104519
Steven A. Lavender , Carolyn M. Sommerich , Anas Kachlan
{"title":"A field test of the EMS LiftKit: Validating its usability, usefulness, and desirability","authors":"Steven A. Lavender ,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Sommerich ,&nbsp;Anas Kachlan","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research-to-practice (R2P) study aimed to evaluate the usability, usefulness, and desirability of the LiftKit's seven patient handling tools in real world patient handling tasks experienced by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. These tools were previously shown to effectively reduce physical demands during simulated patient handling tasks in a laboratory setting. Sixteen LiftKits were deployed across five EMS organizations. Follow-up interviews were conducted periodically at each site after LiftKit implementation and a usability, usefulness, and desirability survey was administered at the completion of the 12-month trial. Results from the survey show that those who used the tools provided strong usefulness and usability ratings. Desirability ratings were generally strong, though somewhat varied, across the participating organizations. Consistent themes across the final interviews were that the tools were useful, especially in tight spaces, and versatile. Overall, the study confirmed the usability and usefulness of the LiftKit tools in real patient handling situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research-to-practice (R2P) study aimed to evaluate the usability, usefulness, and desirability of the LiftKit's seven patient handling tools in real world patient handling tasks experienced by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. These tools were previously shown to effectively reduce physical demands during simulated patient handling tasks in a laboratory setting. Sixteen LiftKits were deployed across five EMS organizations. Follow-up interviews were conducted periodically at each site after LiftKit implementation and a usability, usefulness, and desirability survey was administered at the completion of the 12-month trial. Results from the survey show that those who used the tools provided strong usefulness and usability ratings. Desirability ratings were generally strong, though somewhat varied, across the participating organizations. Consistent themes across the final interviews were that the tools were useful, especially in tight spaces, and versatile. Overall, the study confirmed the usability and usefulness of the LiftKit tools in real patient handling situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMS LiftKit的现场测试:验证其可用性、实用性和可取性
这项从研究到实践(R2P)的研究旨在评估LiftKit的七种患者处理工具在紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者所经历的现实世界患者处理任务中的可用性、有用性和可取性。这些工具以前被证明可以有效地减少在实验室环境中模拟病人处理任务时的身体需求。在五个EMS组织中部署了16个liftkit。在LiftKit实施后,在每个站点定期进行随访访谈,并在12个月的试验结束时进行可用性、有用性和可取性调查。调查结果显示,使用这些工具的人提供了很强的有用性和可用性评级。在参与的组织中,可取性评级总体上很高,尽管有所不同。在最后的采访中,一致的主题是这些工具是有用的,特别是在狭小的空间里,而且是通用的。总的来说,该研究证实了LiftKit工具在实际患者处理情况下的可用性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Perceived safety during human-robot interaction with an autonomous mobile robot Effects of anticipatory auditory cues and non-driving related tasks on motion sickness in automated vehicles Automated vehicle's human-machine interfaces design with haptic feedback: A meta-analysis Whole-body vibration exposure in long-nose 10-wheel dumper trucks and some influencing factors Psychosocial risk factors for WRMSDs among agricultural workers: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1