Mandibular movement function before and after anterior repositioning occlusal device treatment for temporomandibular disorders assessed using an ultrasonic facebow
Bo Pang MDS , Jinfeng Yao DDS, PhD , Kan Chen DDS, PhD , Cong Peng MDS , Liang Yang MDS , Zhigang Liang MDS
{"title":"Mandibular movement function before and after anterior repositioning occlusal device treatment for temporomandibular disorders assessed using an ultrasonic facebow","authors":"Bo Pang MDS , Jinfeng Yao DDS, PhD , Kan Chen DDS, PhD , Cong Peng MDS , Liang Yang MDS , Zhigang Liang MDS","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Information relating to the use of the Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA) ultrasonic facebow to evaluate the efficiency of an anterior repositioning occlusal device (AROD) is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this clinical study was to use an ultrasonic facebow to make a preliminary analysis of and explore mandibular movement function.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Temporomandibular disorders were treated with AROD for 3 months, and an ultrasonic facebow was used to accurately record changes in the condylar position and the mandibular border movement tracing of patients before and after AROD treatment. Finally, the changes and characteristics of the mandibular border movement tracing and the 3-dimensional position of the condyle process were compared and analyzed statistically. A comparison of parameter differences between groups, <em>t</em> test analysis, and variance chi-squared test and 1-way ANOVA were performed (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before treatment, the difference in maximum mouth opening (MMO) between the control and experimental groups was statistically significantly different (<em>P</em><.05). No statistically significant difference (<em>P</em>>.05) in MMO was found between the control group and the experimental group after treatment. However, a statistically significant difference (<em>P</em><.05) was found between the experimental group before and after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After AROD treatment, a new balanced relationship was generated between the facial muscles, the temporomandibular joint, and occlusal states, thus resulting in an improvement in the coordinated position and motion function of the condyle. The JMA ultrasonic facebow was found to be a reliable instrument that can accurately record dynamic movements of the temporomandibular joint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 5","pages":"Pages 1275.e1-1275.e12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325002562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem
Information relating to the use of the Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA) ultrasonic facebow to evaluate the efficiency of an anterior repositioning occlusal device (AROD) is lacking.
Purpose
The purpose of this clinical study was to use an ultrasonic facebow to make a preliminary analysis of and explore mandibular movement function.
Material and methods
Temporomandibular disorders were treated with AROD for 3 months, and an ultrasonic facebow was used to accurately record changes in the condylar position and the mandibular border movement tracing of patients before and after AROD treatment. Finally, the changes and characteristics of the mandibular border movement tracing and the 3-dimensional position of the condyle process were compared and analyzed statistically. A comparison of parameter differences between groups, t test analysis, and variance chi-squared test and 1-way ANOVA were performed (α=.05).
Results
Before treatment, the difference in maximum mouth opening (MMO) between the control and experimental groups was statistically significantly different (P<.05). No statistically significant difference (P>.05) in MMO was found between the control group and the experimental group after treatment. However, a statistically significant difference (P<.05) was found between the experimental group before and after treatment.
Conclusions
After AROD treatment, a new balanced relationship was generated between the facial muscles, the temporomandibular joint, and occlusal states, thus resulting in an improvement in the coordinated position and motion function of the condyle. The JMA ultrasonic facebow was found to be a reliable instrument that can accurately record dynamic movements of the temporomandibular joint.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
