The Effects of Intermittent Sprint Training on Running Economy and Leg Stiffness in Highly Trained Runners.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/SKPQ5840
Drew Thibault, Connor Ellis, Garrett Toms, Allison Schaefer, David A Titcomb
{"title":"The Effects of Intermittent Sprint Training on Running Economy and Leg Stiffness in Highly Trained Runners.","authors":"Drew Thibault, Connor Ellis, Garrett Toms, Allison Schaefer, David A Titcomb","doi":"10.70252/SKPQ5840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly sprint training on running economy (RE) and leg stiffness (LS) in highly trained athletes (12 M, 13 F, mean age 24.8 ± 7.1). Participants were recruited based on weekly exercise volume (minimum 4 hours) and athletic ability calculated by World Athletics score (minimum 500). RE and LS were evaluated at three velocities before and after 12 weeks of once-weekly sprint training. On average, participants experienced a non-statistically significant improvement in RE (average percent change -2.0 ± 5.6%, -1.2 ± 5.2%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen's d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), and a statistically significant improvement in LS (12.59 ± 9.2%, 11.49 ± 10.9%, 15.67 ± 11.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68) at the three running velocities. Interestingly, the improvement in LS was significantly influenced by a reduction in vertical displacement during the gait cycle (-17.7 ± 11.7%, -15.7 ± 12.2, -17.3 ± 13.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91). Changes in RE and LS were significantly different when data were analyzed by exercise volume during the intervention period (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that LS, independently shown to improve performance and RE, can be improved by sprint training in highly trained athletes. Additionally, the average participant improvement in RE suggests that sprint training may lead to statistically significant improvement with an increase in participants and tighter participant training control.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 5","pages":"290-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/SKPQ5840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly sprint training on running economy (RE) and leg stiffness (LS) in highly trained athletes (12 M, 13 F, mean age 24.8 ± 7.1). Participants were recruited based on weekly exercise volume (minimum 4 hours) and athletic ability calculated by World Athletics score (minimum 500). RE and LS were evaluated at three velocities before and after 12 weeks of once-weekly sprint training. On average, participants experienced a non-statistically significant improvement in RE (average percent change -2.0 ± 5.6%, -1.2 ± 5.2%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, p = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen's d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), and a statistically significant improvement in LS (12.59 ± 9.2%, 11.49 ± 10.9%, 15.67 ± 11.2%, p = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68) at the three running velocities. Interestingly, the improvement in LS was significantly influenced by a reduction in vertical displacement during the gait cycle (-17.7 ± 11.7%, -15.7 ± 12.2, -17.3 ± 13.4%, p < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91). Changes in RE and LS were significantly different when data were analyzed by exercise volume during the intervention period (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that LS, independently shown to improve performance and RE, can be improved by sprint training in highly trained athletes. Additionally, the average participant improvement in RE suggests that sprint training may lead to statistically significant improvement with an increase in participants and tighter participant training control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间歇冲刺训练对高强度跑步者跑步经济性和腿部僵硬度的影响。
本研究的目的是评估每周一次短跑训练对高训练运动员(12米,13米,平均年龄24.8±7.1)的跑步经济性(RE)和腿部僵硬度(LS)的影响。参与者根据每周运动量(最少4小时)和世界田径成绩计算的运动能力(最少500分)招募。在12周的每周一次冲刺训练之前和之后,以三种速度评估RE和LS。平均而言,在三种跑步速度下,参与者的RE改善无统计学意义(平均百分比变化-2.0±5.6%,-1.2±5.2%,-1.0±4.6%,p = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen’s d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), LS改善有统计学意义(12.59±9.2%,11.49±10.9%,15.67±11.2%,p = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen’s d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68)。有趣的是,步态周期中垂直位移的减少显著影响了LS的改善(-17.7±11.7%,-15.7±12.2,-17.3±13.4%,p < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91)。以运动量分析干预期间RE、LS的变化差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。本研究表明,在训练有素的运动员中,LS可以通过短跑训练来提高成绩和RE。此外,平均参与者在RE方面的改善表明,随着参与者的增加和更严格的参与者训练控制,冲刺训练可能会导致统计学上显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study Examining the Convergent Validity of Two Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitoring Devices During Swimming of Different Intensities and Strokes. Relationships Between Training Load, Perceived Cognitive Load and Sleep in Student-Athletes. Fitness-Fatness Index on Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes in College-Aged Students. Relationship Between Mechanical Variables and Maximum Strength in Countermovement and Pure Concentric Pull-Ups Among Male Collegiate Athletes. Sport-Specific Neuromuscular Profiles in Male Youth Swimmers and Sailors: A Comparative Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1