Depression and Autonomy in Physician-Assisted Suicide.

IF 1.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhaf005
Rina Tzinman
{"title":"Depression and Autonomy in Physician-Assisted Suicide.","authors":"Rina Tzinman","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard view in medical practice is that patients have to be in an appropriate state of mind to count as autonomous. For example, according to the Macarthur Competency Assessment Tool for Treatment patients need to be able to: (1) communicate a choice; (2) factually understand the issues; (3) appreciate their situation; and (4) rationally manipulate information. These capacities are normally taken to be compromised by factors that may diminish one's capacity to properly assess one's situation. One of these diminishing factors is depression, which is especially relevant to decisions about assisted suicide or termination of treatment, since depression might contribute to the patient's leaning towards an action resulting in her death. I argue, however, that in certain circumstances, depression and the accompanying desires can be appropriate. Specifically, I demonstrate that even when depression is a factor in the patient's decision, it does not automatically undermine autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"285-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard view in medical practice is that patients have to be in an appropriate state of mind to count as autonomous. For example, according to the Macarthur Competency Assessment Tool for Treatment patients need to be able to: (1) communicate a choice; (2) factually understand the issues; (3) appreciate their situation; and (4) rationally manipulate information. These capacities are normally taken to be compromised by factors that may diminish one's capacity to properly assess one's situation. One of these diminishing factors is depression, which is especially relevant to decisions about assisted suicide or termination of treatment, since depression might contribute to the patient's leaning towards an action resulting in her death. I argue, however, that in certain circumstances, depression and the accompanying desires can be appropriate. Specifically, I demonstrate that even when depression is a factor in the patient's decision, it does not automatically undermine autonomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生协助自杀中的抑郁和自主。
医疗实践中的标准观点是,患者必须处于适当的精神状态才能算作自主。例如,根据麦克阿瑟治疗能力评估工具,患者需要能够:(1)沟通选择;(2)实事求是地了解问题;(三)了解对方的处境;(4)合理处理信息。这些能力通常被认为受到一些因素的损害,这些因素可能会削弱一个人正确评估自己处境的能力。这些逐渐减少的因素之一是抑郁症,这与协助自杀或终止治疗的决定尤其相关,因为抑郁症可能会导致患者倾向于导致其死亡的行为。然而,我认为,在某些情况下,抑郁和伴随的欲望是适当的。具体来说,我证明了即使抑郁是影响患者决策的一个因素,它也不会自动削弱患者的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.
期刊最新文献
Fair Consent Transactions and Ethical Pluralism. Unraveling Networks: The Conceptual Incoherence of the Network Approach. Depressed, Not Disordered: Fittingness and Pathologies of Emotion. The Case for Pluralism in Death Determination: From Empirical Data to a Policy Proposal. Compassionate Understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1