Estimating opportunity costs for energy-efficiency renovations: Case study in Germany

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108629
Ray Galvin , Paul Galvin
{"title":"Estimating opportunity costs for energy-efficiency renovations: Case study in Germany","authors":"Ray Galvin ,&nbsp;Paul Galvin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since energy consumption in residential buildings produces 26 % of CO2 emissions worldwide, there is an urgent need to improve the energy efficiency of older buildings. This is expensive, and a component often poorly estimated is opportunity costs: the losses a building owner incurs by investing in an energy-efficiency upgrade rather than in a more profitable project. Some recent studies assume opportunity costs of about 6 % of the property owner's up-front cash investment, but they assume very passive investment behavior. This paper uses a case study of a standard energy-performance upgrade of a typical, gas-heated 1950s–60s western German apartment and an alternative investment of purchasing an additional rental property. It uses realistic figures for costs of renovation and finance, benefits through energy and CO2 tax savings and subsidies currently on offer, likely energy price and CO2 tax inflation rates, and realistic discount rates. The alternative investment is to purchase a rental apartment using the up-front cash as the deposit, based on actual properties for sale. After 25 years the most economically sound upgrade brings a loss of around 207 %, while the purchase brings a gain of at least 666 %, with a minimum opportunity cost of 8.49 % per year cumulative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 108629"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since energy consumption in residential buildings produces 26 % of CO2 emissions worldwide, there is an urgent need to improve the energy efficiency of older buildings. This is expensive, and a component often poorly estimated is opportunity costs: the losses a building owner incurs by investing in an energy-efficiency upgrade rather than in a more profitable project. Some recent studies assume opportunity costs of about 6 % of the property owner's up-front cash investment, but they assume very passive investment behavior. This paper uses a case study of a standard energy-performance upgrade of a typical, gas-heated 1950s–60s western German apartment and an alternative investment of purchasing an additional rental property. It uses realistic figures for costs of renovation and finance, benefits through energy and CO2 tax savings and subsidies currently on offer, likely energy price and CO2 tax inflation rates, and realistic discount rates. The alternative investment is to purchase a rental apartment using the up-front cash as the deposit, based on actual properties for sale. After 25 years the most economically sound upgrade brings a loss of around 207 %, while the purchase brings a gain of at least 666 %, with a minimum opportunity cost of 8.49 % per year cumulative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估节能改造的机会成本:以德国为例
由于住宅建筑的能源消耗产生了全球26%的二氧化碳排放量,因此迫切需要提高旧建筑的能源效率。这是昂贵的,而机会成本往往被低估:建筑业主投资于能效升级而不是更有利可图的项目所造成的损失。最近的一些研究假设机会成本约为业主前期现金投资的6%,但他们假设的是非常被动的投资行为。本文使用了一个案例研究,对一套典型的20世纪50年代至60年代的德国西部燃气供暖公寓进行了标准的能源性能升级,并购买了一套额外的租赁物业作为替代投资。它使用了翻新和融资成本的实际数字、目前提供的能源和二氧化碳税节约和补贴所带来的效益、可能的能源价格和二氧化碳税通货膨胀率以及实际的贴现率。另一种投资方式是根据实际出售的房产,用预付的现金作为定金购买出租公寓。25年后,最经济的升级带来的损失约为207%,而购买带来的收益至少为666%,每年累计的最低机会成本为8.49%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
From grand challenges to bold solutions: Investor perspectives on financing urban climate change adaptation The value of cooperation for biodiversity conservation policies Measuring equity in environmental care: Methodology and an application to traffic-related air pollution Impact of sustainable land management on household resilience gaps: Evidence from China's marginalized farmers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1