Influence of drainage infrastructure and land use on microplastic contamination in urban watersheds.

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/etojnl/vgaf092
Brittanie L Dabney, Donna R Kashian
{"title":"Influence of drainage infrastructure and land use on microplastic contamination in urban watersheds.","authors":"Brittanie L Dabney, Donna R Kashian","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stormwater runoff is a significant source of microplastic (MP) contamination in tributaries. However, the role of drainage infrastructure (e.g. surface drains and pipes) and land use in the transport of MPs into freshwater systems is largely unknown. Here, we quantify and compare MP concentrations deposited below surface drains and pipe stormwater outfalls in two distinct urban watersheds: one characterized by agricultural and forested land cover, and the other dominated by residential and commercial development. We compared MP morphologies and abundances upstream and downstream of 20 stormwater outfalls to determine the influence of outfall type on MP accumulation. Three surface water and sediment samples were collected at each sampling location along with measurements of chemical and physical water quality parameters. Microplastics were identified using Nile Red staining, a rapid and effective screening technique suitable for large-scale environmental assessments while minimizing resource-intensive analyses. Fragments were the most abundant MP morphology and were the primary form driving differences in total MP concentrations among the sites. Flow velocity had the greatest impact on plastic concentrations in the sediment, and the accumulation of MPs in surface water increased as water depth decreased. The highest MP concentrations were found at pipe outfalls in both surface water and sediment compared with surface drains. The watershed with more agricultural and forested landcover had higher MP concentrations downstream of both types of drainage infrastructure than the more developed urban watersheds. These findings highlight the importance of considering both land use characteristics and drainage infrastructure when assessing MP input into freshwater systems, providing valuable insights for decision-making on monitoring, retention, and remediation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1785-1796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stormwater runoff is a significant source of microplastic (MP) contamination in tributaries. However, the role of drainage infrastructure (e.g. surface drains and pipes) and land use in the transport of MPs into freshwater systems is largely unknown. Here, we quantify and compare MP concentrations deposited below surface drains and pipe stormwater outfalls in two distinct urban watersheds: one characterized by agricultural and forested land cover, and the other dominated by residential and commercial development. We compared MP morphologies and abundances upstream and downstream of 20 stormwater outfalls to determine the influence of outfall type on MP accumulation. Three surface water and sediment samples were collected at each sampling location along with measurements of chemical and physical water quality parameters. Microplastics were identified using Nile Red staining, a rapid and effective screening technique suitable for large-scale environmental assessments while minimizing resource-intensive analyses. Fragments were the most abundant MP morphology and were the primary form driving differences in total MP concentrations among the sites. Flow velocity had the greatest impact on plastic concentrations in the sediment, and the accumulation of MPs in surface water increased as water depth decreased. The highest MP concentrations were found at pipe outfalls in both surface water and sediment compared with surface drains. The watershed with more agricultural and forested landcover had higher MP concentrations downstream of both types of drainage infrastructure than the more developed urban watersheds. These findings highlight the importance of considering both land use characteristics and drainage infrastructure when assessing MP input into freshwater systems, providing valuable insights for decision-making on monitoring, retention, and remediation strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市流域排水基础设施和土地利用对微塑料污染的影响
雨水径流是支流中微塑料(MP)污染的重要来源。然而,排水基础设施(如地表排水管和管道)和土地利用在将多聚污染物输送到淡水系统中的作用在很大程度上是未知的。在这里,我们量化并比较了两个不同的城市流域中地表排水沟和管道雨水出水口下沉积的微塑料浓度:一个以农业和森林土地覆盖为特征,另一个以住宅和商业开发为主导。我们比较了20个雨水出水口上下游的MP形态和丰度,以确定出水口类型对MP积累的影响。在每个采样地点收集了三个地表水和沉积物样本,并测量了化学和物理水质参数。使用尼罗红染色鉴定微塑料,这是一种快速有效的筛选技术,适用于大规模环境评估,同时最大限度地减少资源密集型分析。片段是最丰富的MP形态,是驱动位点间总MP浓度差异的主要形式。流速对沉积物中塑料浓度的影响最大,随着水深的降低,表层水中微塑料的积累量增加。与地表水和沉积物的管道出口相比,地表水和沉积物的管道出口都发现了最高的MP浓度。与较发达的城市流域相比,农业和森林土地覆盖较多的流域在两种排水基础设施下游的MP浓度较高。这些发现强调了在评估向淡水系统输入的多氯污染物时考虑土地利用特征和排水基础设施的重要性,为监测、保留和补救策略的决策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
期刊最新文献
Environmental factors influencing the efficiency of mercury transfer from sediments to fish in the Colombian Pacific and Caribbean. Introduction to Special Series on Hazardous Waste Sites and Remediation Case Studies: Risk Reduction, Synergies Between Remediation and Restoration Goals. Using the fish plasma model to prioritize pharmaceuticals and protect fish from potential adverse effects. Multi-level metabolic Profiling of Synthetic Cannabinoid 5F-ADB: Identifying Definitive Biomarkers for Forensic Source Tracking and Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment. Impact of perfluorooctanoic acid on sperm function and early development in Prochilodus magdalenae: implications for aquatic species reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1