Learning Health Systems Research: Continued Progress and Ongoing Challenges.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002121
Rebecca L Tisdale, Urmimala Sarkar
{"title":"Learning Health Systems Research: Continued Progress and Ongoing Challenges.","authors":"Rebecca L Tisdale, Urmimala Sarkar","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning health systems research (LHSR) builds on concepts of systems-based participatory research to form a new paradigm for partnered research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Defines LHSR and its ongoing challenges and future directions.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Qualitative description of relevant dimensions of LHSR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In LHSR, researchers and health system stakeholders co-create research with dual aims of producing internal quality improvement and generalizable, disseminable knowledge. This approach aligns research priorities with community and health system needs, resulting in interventions that are both feasible and acceptable in real-world settings and effective. LHSR methods and outcomes reflect elements of implementation science, particularly participatory implementation science and the use of mixed methods, but the field is distinct in its emphasis on co-creation with health system leaders and the use of theory to inform rather than drive the work. Practitioners of LHSR face challenges related to the complex and multi-stakeholder nature of the field, including the time-intensive nature of building partnerships, conflicting project time horizons, imprecision inherent in real-world data, and barriers to publication of the smaller studies that typically result from LHSR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued advancement of the field requires confronting these challenges with a variety of interventions, including explicit institutional support and incentives for this type of work, training and career development opportunities, a diversity of funding sources, investment in data resources and expertise, and inclusive research governance structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 5","pages":"331-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learning health systems research (LHSR) builds on concepts of systems-based participatory research to form a new paradigm for partnered research.

Objective: Defines LHSR and its ongoing challenges and future directions.

Research design: Qualitative description of relevant dimensions of LHSR.

Results: In LHSR, researchers and health system stakeholders co-create research with dual aims of producing internal quality improvement and generalizable, disseminable knowledge. This approach aligns research priorities with community and health system needs, resulting in interventions that are both feasible and acceptable in real-world settings and effective. LHSR methods and outcomes reflect elements of implementation science, particularly participatory implementation science and the use of mixed methods, but the field is distinct in its emphasis on co-creation with health system leaders and the use of theory to inform rather than drive the work. Practitioners of LHSR face challenges related to the complex and multi-stakeholder nature of the field, including the time-intensive nature of building partnerships, conflicting project time horizons, imprecision inherent in real-world data, and barriers to publication of the smaller studies that typically result from LHSR.

Conclusions: Continued advancement of the field requires confronting these challenges with a variety of interventions, including explicit institutional support and incentives for this type of work, training and career development opportunities, a diversity of funding sources, investment in data resources and expertise, and inclusive research governance structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习型卫生系统研究:持续的进步和不断的挑战。
背景:学习型卫生系统研究(LHSR)建立在基于系统的参与性研究概念的基础上,形成了合作研究的新范式。目标:定义LHSR及其正在面临的挑战和未来方向。研究设计:对高铁相关维度进行定性描述。结果:在LHSR中,研究人员和卫生系统利益相关者共同开展研究,以实现内部质量改进和可推广、可传播的知识的双重目标。这种方法使研究重点与社区和卫生系统的需求保持一致,从而产生在现实环境中既可行又可接受且有效的干预措施。LHSR的方法和结果反映了实施科学的要素,特别是参与性实施科学和混合方法的使用,但该领域的独特之处在于强调与卫生系统领导人共同创造,以及利用理论为工作提供信息而不是推动工作。LHSR的实践者面临着与该领域的复杂性和多利益相关者性质相关的挑战,包括建立伙伴关系的时间密集性、相互冲突的项目时间范围、现实世界数据固有的不精确,以及通常由LHSR产生的小型研究的发表障碍。结论:该领域的持续发展需要通过各种干预措施来应对这些挑战,包括对这类工作的明确制度支持和激励、培训和职业发展机会、多样化的资金来源、对数据资源和专业知识的投资,以及包容性的研究治理结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Does Anesthesia Provider Type Affect Veteran Satisfaction With Care? Purchasing Versus Providing Care at the VHA: Quality Differences in Follow-Up After Psychiatric Hospitalization. Magnet4Europe Intervention to Improve Clinician and Patient Well-Being: A Quasi-Experimental Study of 56 Hospitals in 6 European Countries. Comparing Predictive Power of Area-Level Socioeconomic Status Indices Across Health Outcomes and Geographic Levels. Peripartum Telehealth Care Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic, by Hypertension Status, PCORnet®, 2018 to 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1