From classroom to clinic: evaluating a clinical pathology course to strengthen pathology report literacy of medical interns.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07001-4
Fariba Abbasi, Parvin Ayremlu, Zahra Niazkhani
{"title":"From classroom to clinic: evaluating a clinical pathology course to strengthen pathology report literacy of medical interns.","authors":"Fariba Abbasi, Parvin Ayremlu, Zahra Niazkhani","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07001-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathology reports serve as the primary communication tool between pathologists and clinicians, directly influencing clinical decision-making and treatment strategies. Despite their critical role, medical students may struggle with interpreting these reports, which can lead to miscommunication and potential diagnostic errors. This study investigated the impact of incorporating a clinical pathology course into the routine medical curriculum to enhance medical students' understanding of pathology reports and their satisfaction with the course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 92 medical students in their internship phase, who were divided into two groups: those who had completed the clinical pathology course and those who had not. The participants were provided with two pathology reports (covering malignant and benign gastrointestinal diseases) and a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items. The data were analyzed via the chi-square test to assess significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical interns who completed the course demonstrated significantly higher rates of moderate interpretation scores (80.43% vs. 63.04%) and lower rates of weak scores (6.53% vs. 32.61%) compared to those who did not participate (p = 0.001). Interns who passed the clinical pathology course had a significantly greater mean number of correct answers for interpreting malignant cases reports (p = 0.04), although no significant difference was found for benign cases reports (p = 0.93). Most interns who completed the course reported that it helped improve their interpretation skills, although some felt that the perceived benefits were limited. Additionally, the study identified key challenges students still faced when interpreting pathology reports including difficulties with pathology report terminology, understanding cancer staging abbreviations, and applying basic pathology concepts in clinical context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that clinical pathology courses can improve medical students' understanding of pathology reports, particularly in cases of cancer, but improvements in course content and teaching methods are needed. This research offers valuable insights into improving medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07001-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathology reports serve as the primary communication tool between pathologists and clinicians, directly influencing clinical decision-making and treatment strategies. Despite their critical role, medical students may struggle with interpreting these reports, which can lead to miscommunication and potential diagnostic errors. This study investigated the impact of incorporating a clinical pathology course into the routine medical curriculum to enhance medical students' understanding of pathology reports and their satisfaction with the course.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 92 medical students in their internship phase, who were divided into two groups: those who had completed the clinical pathology course and those who had not. The participants were provided with two pathology reports (covering malignant and benign gastrointestinal diseases) and a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items. The data were analyzed via the chi-square test to assess significant differences between groups.

Results: Medical interns who completed the course demonstrated significantly higher rates of moderate interpretation scores (80.43% vs. 63.04%) and lower rates of weak scores (6.53% vs. 32.61%) compared to those who did not participate (p = 0.001). Interns who passed the clinical pathology course had a significantly greater mean number of correct answers for interpreting malignant cases reports (p = 0.04), although no significant difference was found for benign cases reports (p = 0.93). Most interns who completed the course reported that it helped improve their interpretation skills, although some felt that the perceived benefits were limited. Additionally, the study identified key challenges students still faced when interpreting pathology reports including difficulties with pathology report terminology, understanding cancer staging abbreviations, and applying basic pathology concepts in clinical context.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that clinical pathology courses can improve medical students' understanding of pathology reports, particularly in cases of cancer, but improvements in course content and teaching methods are needed. This research offers valuable insights into improving medical education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从课堂到临床:对临床病理学课程进行评价,加强医学实习生的病理报告素养。
背景:病理报告是病理学家和临床医生之间的主要沟通工具,直接影响临床决策和治疗策略。尽管他们的角色至关重要,但医学生在解释这些报告时可能会遇到困难,这可能导致误解和潜在的诊断错误。本研究旨在探讨将临床病理学课程纳入医学常规课程,对提高医学生对病理报告的理解及对课程的满意度的影响。方法:采用横断面研究方法,将92名实习医学生分为两组,一组完成临床病理学课程,另一组未完成临床病理学课程。参与者获得两份病理报告(包括恶性和良性胃肠道疾病)和一份由24个项目组成的自填问卷。采用卡方检验对数据进行分析,以评估组间的显著差异。结果:完成课程的医学实习生口译得分中率(80.43%比63.04%)显著高于未参加课程的实习生,口译得分低率(6.53%比32.61%)显著低于未参加课程的实习生(p = 0.001)。通过临床病理课程的实习生对恶性病例报告的平均答对次数显著高于通过临床病理课程的实习生(p = 0.04),而对良性病例报告的平均答对次数无显著差异(p = 0.93)。大多数完成课程的实习生报告说,这有助于提高他们的口译技能,尽管有些人认为所看到的好处有限。此外,该研究确定了学生在解释病理报告时仍然面临的主要挑战,包括病理报告术语的困难,理解癌症分期缩写,以及在临床环境中应用基本病理概念。结论:临床病理学课程可以提高医学生对病理报告的理解,特别是对癌症病例的理解,但课程内容和教学方法有待改进。这项研究为改进医学教育提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Student background, admission routes, and academic success: a structural mediation analysis. Perceptions and characteristics of the mentor role in research capacity building programs for clinicians: a scoping review and thematic analysis. Assessment of project-based learning outcomes in veterinary anatomy: a descriptive mixed-methods study. Assessing antimicrobial resistance inclusion in pre-service pharmacy training curricula of five selected sub-Saharan African universities: challenges and opportunities. Effectiveness of escape room-based learning for patient safety education in nursing students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1