[Munchausen by proxy qualitative case analysis].

Q4 Medicine Psychiatria Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Petra N Tamás, Anna Lisincki, Éva Jekkel
{"title":"[Munchausen by proxy qualitative case analysis].","authors":"Petra N Tamás, Anna Lisincki, Éva Jekkel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 1977, Meadow coined the term Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP) to describe a situation in which a parent or caregiver fabricates or induces illness in a child, leading to painful diagnostic procedures and hospital treatments. This can result in both short- and long-term psychological and physiological damage, with potentially severe consequences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The aim of this study, beyond summarizing the existing literature, is to explore the underlying personality traits, psychological mechanisms, motives, and dynamics associated with MSBP through two case analyses. These analyses are based on a thematic content analysis of exploratory interview material and the results of psychological personality tests (Rorschach, MMPI, SCID-II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thematic analysis of the two interviews identified the following common main themes: Background and pre-existing life events (e.g., loss as a traumatic event); Indicators of Munchausen by Proxy (e.g., manipulation of medical records or samples); Personality traits (e.g., theatricality, manipulative behavior, trivialization, relationship dependency, egocentricity); Motivating factors and consequences of Munchausen by Proxy (e.g., illness-related secondary gain).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both cases shared a history of multiple traumatic events prior to the onset of MSBP-such as bereavement, miscarriage, and abuse - which likely had a significant impact on their personality and emotional state. Another common factor was the close, intense, and symbiotic relationship with the child. However, the cases differed in the degree of aggression involved in inducing illness in the child. In both cases, a diagnosis of personality disorder was confirmed, predominantly with histrionic traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":35063,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Hungarica","volume":"39 4","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 1977, Meadow coined the term Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP) to describe a situation in which a parent or caregiver fabricates or induces illness in a child, leading to painful diagnostic procedures and hospital treatments. This can result in both short- and long-term psychological and physiological damage, with potentially severe consequences.

Method: The aim of this study, beyond summarizing the existing literature, is to explore the underlying personality traits, psychological mechanisms, motives, and dynamics associated with MSBP through two case analyses. These analyses are based on a thematic content analysis of exploratory interview material and the results of psychological personality tests (Rorschach, MMPI, SCID-II).

Results: The thematic analysis of the two interviews identified the following common main themes: Background and pre-existing life events (e.g., loss as a traumatic event); Indicators of Munchausen by Proxy (e.g., manipulation of medical records or samples); Personality traits (e.g., theatricality, manipulative behavior, trivialization, relationship dependency, egocentricity); Motivating factors and consequences of Munchausen by Proxy (e.g., illness-related secondary gain).

Conclusion: Both cases shared a history of multiple traumatic events prior to the onset of MSBP-such as bereavement, miscarriage, and abuse - which likely had a significant impact on their personality and emotional state. Another common factor was the close, intense, and symbiotic relationship with the child. However, the cases differed in the degree of aggression involved in inducing illness in the child. In both cases, a diagnosis of personality disorder was confirmed, predominantly with histrionic traits.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Munchausen代理定性案例分析]。
简介:1977年,梅多创造了“孟乔森代理综合症”(MSBP)一词,用来描述父母或照顾者捏造或诱导孩子生病,导致痛苦的诊断过程和住院治疗的情况。这可能导致短期和长期的心理和生理损伤,并可能造成严重后果。方法:本研究的目的是在总结现有文献的基础上,通过两个案例分析,探讨与MSBP相关的潜在人格特征、心理机制、动机和动态。这些分析是基于探索性访谈材料的主题内容分析和心理人格测试(罗夏,MMPI, SCID-II)的结果。结果:对两次访谈的主题分析确定了以下共同主题:背景和先前的生活事件(例如,作为创伤性事件的损失);代理蒙乔森指标(例如,篡改医疗记录或样本);人格特征(如戏剧性、操纵行为、琐碎化、关系依赖、自我中心);代理诱发Munchausen的激励因素和后果(例如,与疾病相关的二次增益)。结论:这两个病例在msbp发病前都经历过多重创伤事件,如丧亲、流产和虐待,这可能对他们的个性和情绪状态产生了重大影响。另一个共同的因素是与孩子密切、强烈和共生的关系。然而,这些案例在引发儿童疾病的攻击程度上有所不同。在这两个病例中,确诊为人格障碍,主要表现为表演特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Hungarica
Psychiatria Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[A national survey of the practice of adjudication of the legality of involuntary psychiatric admissions]. [Escape from Personality: The Life, Work, and Illness of John Berryman]. [Fathers and Their Adult Autistic Sons. An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of a Lifelong Experience]. [Hungarian adaptation of the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - revised (GSTRS - R): a pilot study regarding the reliability measures of the scale]. [Phenomenology of Redeployed Psychiatric Nurses].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1