The intersecting disability and race attitudes implicit association test.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Rehabilitation Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1037/rep0000623

Carli Friedman

{"title":"The intersecting disability and race attitudes implicit association test.","authors":"Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1037/rep0000623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Due to the ways disability and race overlap, intersect, and inform each other, to dismantle ableism, we must first understand how these processes operate in an intersectional manner, including when it comes to implicit bias. Yet, social psychology, and its prominent measures, including the implicit association test (IAT), have often taken a single-axis approach rather than attending to intersectionality. This study's aim was to develop and establish the intersecting disability and race attitudes implicit association test (IDRA-IAT).Research method: We piloted the IDRA-IAT (July-October 2024) with 536 people (27.7% nondisabled White people, 32.3% disabled White people, 12.7% nondisabled people of color, and 27.3% disabled people of color). We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, t tests, split-half reliability (internal consistency), and correlation analyses (test-retest reliability, and construct validity).Results: People preferred nondisabled White people the most (M = 0.19), then disabled White people (M = 0.04), then nondisabled people of color (M = -0.09), and then disabled people of color (M = -0.13). However, the findings differed significantly based on the participants' identities. Our findings also indicated the IDRA-IAT has similar psychometrics to other IATs.Conclusion: To advance disability justice, much more research about intersectionality and quantitative methodologies that promote intersectionality are necessary. We recognize that there is a lot more that comprises oppression and discrimination than attitudes alone. However, our hope is that the IDRA-IAT can be one valuable tool in the arsenal of many in the work to dismantle the oppression disabled people face. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the ways disability and race overlap, intersect, and inform each other, to dismantle ableism, we must first understand how these processes operate in an intersectional manner, including when it comes to implicit bias. Yet, social psychology, and its prominent measures, including the implicit association test (IAT), have often taken a single-axis approach rather than attending to intersectionality. This study's aim was to develop and establish the intersecting disability and race attitudes implicit association test (IDRA-IAT).

Research method: We piloted the IDRA-IAT (July-October 2024) with 536 people (27.7% nondisabled White people, 32.3% disabled White people, 12.7% nondisabled people of color, and 27.3% disabled people of color). We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, t tests, split-half reliability (internal consistency), and correlation analyses (test-retest reliability, and construct validity).

Results: People preferred nondisabled White people the most (M = 0.19), then disabled White people (M = 0.04), then nondisabled people of color (M = -0.09), and then disabled people of color (M = -0.13). However, the findings differed significantly based on the participants' identities. Our findings also indicated the IDRA-IAT has similar psychometrics to other IATs.

Conclusion: To advance disability justice, much more research about intersectionality and quantitative methodologies that promote intersectionality are necessary. We recognize that there is a lot more that comprises oppression and discrimination than attitudes alone. However, our hope is that the IDRA-IAT can be one valuable tool in the arsenal of many in the work to dismantle the oppression disabled people face. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

残障与种族态度交叉内隐联想测验。

目的：由于残疾和种族相互重叠、交叉和相互告知的方式，为了消除残疾歧视，我们必须首先了解这些过程是如何以交叉的方式运作的，包括当涉及到隐性偏见时。然而，社会心理学及其突出的测量方法，包括内隐联想测试（IAT），往往采取单轴方法，而不是关注交叉性。本研究的目的是发展和建立残疾与种族态度交叉内隐联想测验（IDRA-IAT）。研究方法：对536人（非残疾白人27.7%、残疾白人32.3%、非残疾有色人种12.7%、残疾有色人种27.3%）进行IDRA-IAT试验（2024年7月- 10月）。我们使用描述性统计、t检验、半分信度（内部一致性）和相关分析（重测信度和结构效度）来分析数据。结果：人们最喜欢非残疾白人（M = 0.19），其次是残疾白人（M = 0.04），其次是非残疾有色人种（M = -0.09），最后是残疾有色人种（M = -0.13）。然而，根据参与者的身份，调查结果有很大的不同。我们的研究结果还表明，IDRA-IAT与其他iat具有相似的心理测量学。结论：为了促进残障司法公正，有必要对残障司法的交叉性和促进交叉性的定量方法进行更多的研究。我们认识到，除了态度之外，还有更多的压迫和歧视。然而，我们的希望是，IDRA-IAT可以成为许多人消除残疾人所面临压迫的工作中的一个有价值的工具。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Rehabilitation Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

7.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.