Endometrial preparation protocols did not impact outcomes after frozen-thaw embryo transfer for chronic endometritis treatment.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception and reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6
Xiao Shi, Shuyi Zhang
{"title":"Endometrial preparation protocols did not impact outcomes after frozen-thaw embryo transfer for chronic endometritis treatment.","authors":"Xiao Shi, Shuyi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intended to investigate the potential effects of endometrial preparation procedures on the results of subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in infertile women with chronic endometritis (CE) following a single course of antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2020 to December 2023, 773 infertile patients participated in a retrospective research. CD138 was immunostained in endometrial tissues taken during the proliferative phase. CE was suggested by the presence of CD138-positive cells in the stromal cells. Oral antibiotics were administered to every patient with a CE diagnosis. After one course of drug treatment, patients had endometrial preparation and frozen embryo transfers. This study compared the impact of different endometrial preparation strategies on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four regimens, hormone replacement treatment (HRT), ovulation induction, natural cycle, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-HRT (GnRH agonist-HRT), did not significantly alter the outcome of pregnancy in patients with CE. Compared to other groups, the ovulation induction cycle group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. In addition, the miscarriage rate is lower compared to other populations. Patients with treated CE who received HRT, GnRH agonist-HRT, ovulation induction cycle, and natural cycle did not differ substantially (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with treated CE did not see any change in pregnancy outcomes as a result of endometrial preparation procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intended to investigate the potential effects of endometrial preparation procedures on the results of subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in infertile women with chronic endometritis (CE) following a single course of antibiotic therapy.

Methods: From July 2020 to December 2023, 773 infertile patients participated in a retrospective research. CD138 was immunostained in endometrial tissues taken during the proliferative phase. CE was suggested by the presence of CD138-positive cells in the stromal cells. Oral antibiotics were administered to every patient with a CE diagnosis. After one course of drug treatment, patients had endometrial preparation and frozen embryo transfers. This study compared the impact of different endometrial preparation strategies on pregnancy outcomes.

Results: Four regimens, hormone replacement treatment (HRT), ovulation induction, natural cycle, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-HRT (GnRH agonist-HRT), did not significantly alter the outcome of pregnancy in patients with CE. Compared to other groups, the ovulation induction cycle group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. In addition, the miscarriage rate is lower compared to other populations. Patients with treated CE who received HRT, GnRH agonist-HRT, ovulation induction cycle, and natural cycle did not differ substantially (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with treated CE did not see any change in pregnancy outcomes as a result of endometrial preparation procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜准备方案不会影响冷冻解冻胚胎移植治疗慢性子宫内膜炎的结果。
背景:旨在研究子宫内膜准备程序对慢性子宫内膜炎(CE)不孕妇女在接受一个疗程的抗生素治疗后的后续冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期结果的潜在影响:2020年7月至2023年12月,773名不孕患者参与了一项回顾性研究。对增殖期的子宫内膜组织进行了 CD138 免疫染色。基质细胞中出现 CD138 阳性细胞即为 CE。对每位确诊为 CE 的患者都口服了抗生素。一个疗程的药物治疗后,患者进行子宫内膜制备和冷冻胚胎移植。这项研究比较了不同子宫内膜制备策略对妊娠结果的影响:结果:激素替代治疗(HRT)、促排卵、自然周期和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂-HRT(GnRH 激动剂-HRT)这四种方案对 CE 患者的妊娠结果没有显著影响。与其他组相比,促排卵周期组的临床妊娠率和胚胎植入率更高。此外,流产率也低于其他人群。接受HRT、GnRH激动剂-HRT、促排卵周期和自然周期治疗的CE患者并无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:经过治疗的 CE 患者的妊娠结局不会因子宫内膜准备程序而发生任何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vasectomy knowledge, attitudes, and intentions among men in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of the timing of surgical treatment of hydrosalpinx on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic single-sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in patients with tubal factor infertility. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study on early contraceptive implant removal and its associated factors among women implanted attending family planning settings in Bangladesh. Exploring service providers' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to contraceptive uptake among women: implications for policy reform in Ghana. Attitudes and practices of women's health specialists regarding fertility treatment for social reasons - a reproductive rights' survey from Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1