Exploring the Effects of Propolis on Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yun-Chen Chang, Annamaria Porreca, Raffaella Massafra, Gen-Min Lin, Elsa Vitale
{"title":"Exploring the Effects of Propolis on Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yun-Chen Chang, Annamaria Porreca, Raffaella Massafra, Gen-Min Lin, Elsa Vitale","doi":"10.2174/0118715303356011250307070928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral mucositis (OM) refers to an erythematous, shared, and painful complication resulting from chemotherapy or radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to discuss OM in chemotherapy patients and the use of propolis in medicine inside the hospital and before preparing for or during chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed across three databases, adhering strictly to the inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to maintain research integrity and relevance. The methodological approach was guided by the PRISMA guidelines to ensure systematic rigor and transparency in reporting. To evaluate the quality of the included studies, the Evidence- Based Nursing (EBN) approach specific to randomized trials was employed. Meta-analytical procedures were conducted using a fixed random-effects model, allowing for the synthesis of evidence across studies with the calculation of odds ratios to quantify treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis incorporated seven studies assessing the efficacy of propolis in the treatment of oral mucositis among patients undergoing chemotherapy. The results demonstrated a marked improvement in the condition of patients receiving propolis, with a statistically significant odd ratio (OR) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.70; P = 0.003). However, the analysis did present some asymmetry (z = -1.5970, P = 0.1103) with a limit estimation of b = 0.3653 [CI: -0.7395, 1.4702], indicating a potential trend towards the effectiveness of propolis, though these results did not achieve statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present findings suggest a promising but not yet definitively proven benefit of propolis in managing oral mucositis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303356011250307070928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Oral mucositis (OM) refers to an erythematous, shared, and painful complication resulting from chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Aim: This study aimed to discuss OM in chemotherapy patients and the use of propolis in medicine inside the hospital and before preparing for or during chemotherapy.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across three databases, adhering strictly to the inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to maintain research integrity and relevance. The methodological approach was guided by the PRISMA guidelines to ensure systematic rigor and transparency in reporting. To evaluate the quality of the included studies, the Evidence- Based Nursing (EBN) approach specific to randomized trials was employed. Meta-analytical procedures were conducted using a fixed random-effects model, allowing for the synthesis of evidence across studies with the calculation of odds ratios to quantify treatment effects.

Results: The meta-analysis incorporated seven studies assessing the efficacy of propolis in the treatment of oral mucositis among patients undergoing chemotherapy. The results demonstrated a marked improvement in the condition of patients receiving propolis, with a statistically significant odd ratio (OR) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.70; P = 0.003). However, the analysis did present some asymmetry (z = -1.5970, P = 0.1103) with a limit estimation of b = 0.3653 [CI: -0.7395, 1.4702], indicating a potential trend towards the effectiveness of propolis, though these results did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusion: The present findings suggest a promising but not yet definitively proven benefit of propolis in managing oral mucositis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨蜂胶对化疗患者口腔黏膜炎的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:口腔粘膜炎(OM)是指化疗或放疗引起的一种红斑性、共享性和疼痛性并发症。目的:本研究旨在探讨化疗患者的口腔粘膜炎以及蜂胶在医院内、准备化疗前或化疗期间的药物应用:在三个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,严格遵守随机对照试验(RCT)的纳入标准,以保持研究的完整性和相关性。研究方法以 PRISMA 指南为指导,以确保报告的系统严谨性和透明度。为了评估所纳入研究的质量,采用了专门针对随机试验的循证护理(EBN)方法。荟萃分析程序采用固定随机效应模型,通过计算几率比来量化治疗效果,从而对各项研究的证据进行综合分析:荟萃分析纳入了七项评估蜂胶治疗化疗患者口腔黏膜炎疗效的研究。结果显示,接受蜂胶治疗的患者病情明显好转,奇异比(OR)为0.35(95% 置信区间[CI]:0.18-0.70;P = 0.003),具有统计学意义。然而,分析结果确实存在一定的不对称性(z = -1.5970, P = 0.1103),极限估计值为 b = 0.3653 [CI: -0.7395, 1.4702],这表明蜂胶具有潜在的有效性趋势,但这些结果并没有达到统计学意义:目前的研究结果表明,蜂胶在治疗口腔黏膜炎方面具有良好的前景,但尚未得到明确证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Mechanism to Therapy: Isoliquiritigenin as a Novel Anti-Inflammatory Agent for Inflammatory Disease Management. From Limited Samples to Mechanistic Insights: Exploratory Identification and Functional Validation of a hsa_circ_0062400/hsa_circ_0002397-miR-338-3p-NRP1 Axis in Myasthenia Gravis. Quality of Life in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome after Anti-Androgen Therapy Using PCOSQOL-47 and PCOSQOL-42. Guipi Decoction Attenuates Fibrosis and Oxidative Stress to Ameliorate Diabetic Erectile Dysfunction in Rats via the RhoA/ROCK Signaling Pathway. Mapping the Landscape of Drug Target Identification Based on Activity-Based Protein Profiling: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1