Optimal rooting substrates and hormonal regulation via a multi-omics analysis during Vitis davidii cutting rooting

IF 6.8 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Stress Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.stress.2025.100851
Ting Zheng , Lingzhu Wei , Jiang Xiang , Weiwei Zheng , Jiang Wu , Jianhui Cheng
{"title":"Optimal rooting substrates and hormonal regulation via a multi-omics analysis during Vitis davidii cutting rooting","authors":"Ting Zheng ,&nbsp;Lingzhu Wei ,&nbsp;Jiang Xiang ,&nbsp;Weiwei Zheng ,&nbsp;Jiang Wu ,&nbsp;Jianhui Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.stress.2025.100851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spine grapes (<em>Vitis davidii</em> Foex), a typical wild grape species native to China, is primarily propagated through cutting. However, successful rooting remains a significant challenge in production. Thus, one aim of this study is to identify an optimal substrate for rooting of <em>V.davidii</em> cuttings and explore the hormonal regulation under the rooting process. Among 13 substrates tested, T12 (perlite) produced the highest rooting rate (90%) and a 100% callus formation rate, followed by T1 (rice husk biochar + coarse river sand 1:1) and T2 (rice husk biochar + perlite 1:1). Rooting materials with large, hard particles, such as perlite and coarse river sand, improved rooting. Electron microscopy showed that <em>V. davidii</em> exhibited mixed-type rooting, and there was no direct relationship between callus formation and rooting success. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses indicated that significant differences in auxin and cytokinin were observed between P1 vs P2, suggesting their important roles in bud germination and leaf expansion. Salicylic acid (SA) was essential for callus and root formation, while jasmonic acid (JA) and gibberellins (GA) were more closely associated with direct rooting of cuttings rather than callus formation. Integrated Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses screened 17 crucial hormone regulatory transcription factors during rooting in cuttings. Among these, ARR18 and RR26 were mainly expressed at the P1 stage, while TIFY6B was predominant in P2, and GAI1 was highly active in the P1 and P4 stages. Remarkably, TIFY10A expression was 2.93 times higher in P3 and P4 compared to P1 and P2 and was highly correlated with various hormones. TIFY10A expression increased sharply under exogenous JA treatment and exhibited tissue-specificity. These findings suggest an important role of TIFY10A in the rooting process of grape <em>V. davidii</em> cuttings, particularly in callus and adventitious root formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34736,"journal":{"name":"Plant Stress","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100851"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X25001162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spine grapes (Vitis davidii Foex), a typical wild grape species native to China, is primarily propagated through cutting. However, successful rooting remains a significant challenge in production. Thus, one aim of this study is to identify an optimal substrate for rooting of V.davidii cuttings and explore the hormonal regulation under the rooting process. Among 13 substrates tested, T12 (perlite) produced the highest rooting rate (90%) and a 100% callus formation rate, followed by T1 (rice husk biochar + coarse river sand 1:1) and T2 (rice husk biochar + perlite 1:1). Rooting materials with large, hard particles, such as perlite and coarse river sand, improved rooting. Electron microscopy showed that V. davidii exhibited mixed-type rooting, and there was no direct relationship between callus formation and rooting success. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses indicated that significant differences in auxin and cytokinin were observed between P1 vs P2, suggesting their important roles in bud germination and leaf expansion. Salicylic acid (SA) was essential for callus and root formation, while jasmonic acid (JA) and gibberellins (GA) were more closely associated with direct rooting of cuttings rather than callus formation. Integrated Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses screened 17 crucial hormone regulatory transcription factors during rooting in cuttings. Among these, ARR18 and RR26 were mainly expressed at the P1 stage, while TIFY6B was predominant in P2, and GAI1 was highly active in the P1 and P4 stages. Remarkably, TIFY10A expression was 2.93 times higher in P3 and P4 compared to P1 and P2 and was highly correlated with various hormones. TIFY10A expression increased sharply under exogenous JA treatment and exhibited tissue-specificity. These findings suggest an important role of TIFY10A in the rooting process of grape V. davidii cuttings, particularly in callus and adventitious root formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄扦插生根过程中最佳生根基质和激素调控的多组学分析
刺葡萄(Vitis davidii Foex)是一种典型的原产于中国的野生葡萄品种,主要通过扦插繁殖。然而,成功生根在生产中仍然是一个重大挑战。因此,本研究的目的之一是寻找一种最佳生根基质,并探讨生根过程中的激素调控。13种基质中,T12(珍珠岩)生根率最高(90%),愈伤组织形成率为100%,其次是T1(稻壳生物炭+粗河砂1:1)和T2(稻壳生物炭+珍珠岩1:1)。大而硬颗粒的生根材料,如珍珠岩和粗河砂,可以促进生根。电镜观察结果表明,大维草为混合型生根,愈伤组织的形成与生根成功无直接关系。转录组学和代谢组学分析表明,生长素和细胞分裂素在P1和P2之间存在显著差异,表明它们在芽萌发和叶片扩张中起重要作用。水杨酸(SA)对愈伤组织和根的形成至关重要,而茉莉酸(JA)和赤霉素(GA)与插条的直接生根关系更密切,而与愈伤组织的形成关系更大。综合基因本体(GO)和KEGG分析筛选了插条生根过程中17个关键的激素调控转录因子。其中,ARR18和RR26主要在P1期表达,TIFY6B主要在P2期表达,GAI1在P1和P4期高度活跃。值得注意的是,TIFY10A在P3和P4中的表达量是P1和P2的2.93倍,且与多种激素高度相关。在外源JA处理下,TIFY10A表达急剧增加,并表现出组织特异性。这些结果表明,TIFY10A基因在葡萄扦插生根过程中,特别是在愈伤组织和不定根的形成中起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Stress
Plant Stress PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The journal Plant Stress deals with plant (or other photoautotrophs, such as algae, cyanobacteria and lichens) responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors that can result in limited growth and productivity. Such responses can be analyzed and described at a physiological, biochemical and molecular level. Experimental approaches/technologies aiming to improve growth and productivity with a potential for downstream validation under stress conditions will also be considered. Both fundamental and applied research manuscripts are welcome, provided that clear mechanistic hypotheses are made and descriptive approaches are avoided. In addition, high-quality review articles will also be considered, provided they follow a critical approach and stimulate thought for future research avenues. Plant Stress welcomes high-quality manuscripts related (but not limited) to interactions between plants and: Lack of water (drought) and excess (flooding), Salinity stress, Elevated temperature and/or low temperature (chilling and freezing), Hypoxia and/or anoxia, Mineral nutrient excess and/or deficiency, Heavy metals and/or metalloids, Plant priming (chemical, biological, physiological, nanomaterial, biostimulant) approaches for improved stress protection, Viral, phytoplasma, bacterial and fungal plant-pathogen interactions. The journal welcomes basic and applied research articles, as well as review articles and short communications. All submitted manuscripts will be subject to a thorough peer-reviewing process.
期刊最新文献
Molecular mechanisms of melatonin in mitigating compound salt stress in Sophora alopecuroides revealed by physiological and transcriptomic profiling Biochemical insights into fulvic acid-driven drought tolerance in canola Chitosan molecular weight affects biocontrol efficacy of chitosan-Persian gum-encapsulated Bacillus subtilis PVRC001 against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus Evaluation of the tolerance of duckweed (Lemnaceae) to abiotic stress factors associated with nutrient recycling systems via multispectral imaging Arabidopsis mutants for Mediator Head, Middle, Tail, and Kinase modules reveal distinct roles in regulating the transcriptional response to salt stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1