Comparison of stress response, post-operative complications, and recovery between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) vs standard protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective observational study from northern India

Mohd Danish , Shubhajeet Roy , Shiva Shiva , Shailendra Pal Singh
{"title":"Comparison of stress response, post-operative complications, and recovery between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) vs standard protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective observational study from northern India","authors":"Mohd Danish ,&nbsp;Shubhajeet Roy ,&nbsp;Shiva Shiva ,&nbsp;Shailendra Pal Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The goal of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is to reduce the surgical stress response to promote better postoperative recovery. Widespread adoption of the ERAS initiative has resulted in extending standards for various surgical specialties, especially in colorectal surgery. In this study, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy had their perioperative stress response, postoperative problems, and rehabilitation assessed through a modified ERAS procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>120 patients were enrolled in a prospective observational research and randomly assigned to the ERAS (case) or standard treatment (control) groups. Important elements of the ERAS procedure were multimodal analgesia, carbohydrate loading, and preoperative education. Measurements of serum glucose, cortisol, total leukocyte count (TLC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were performed both before and after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The postoperative serum glucose and cortisol levels were significantly lower (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) in the ERAS group. Serum glucose levels in the ERAS group were greater 6 h after surgery and right before (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Following surgery, the control group's serum cortisol levels were considerably higher (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, the ERAS group experienced fewer problems at discharge, including fever (<em>p</em> = 0.01), vomiting (<em>p</em> = 0.004), and nausea (<em>p</em> = 0.03), and had lower PONV intensity scores at 24 h (<em>p</em> = 0.012). Furthermore, the ERAS group started oral feedings sooner and spent a considerably lower amount of time in the hospital (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified ERAS protocol is beneficial in enhancing perioperative care and outcomes by reducing the surgical stress response and improving recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603025000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The goal of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is to reduce the surgical stress response to promote better postoperative recovery. Widespread adoption of the ERAS initiative has resulted in extending standards for various surgical specialties, especially in colorectal surgery. In this study, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy had their perioperative stress response, postoperative problems, and rehabilitation assessed through a modified ERAS procedure.

Methods

120 patients were enrolled in a prospective observational research and randomly assigned to the ERAS (case) or standard treatment (control) groups. Important elements of the ERAS procedure were multimodal analgesia, carbohydrate loading, and preoperative education. Measurements of serum glucose, cortisol, total leukocyte count (TLC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were performed both before and after surgery.

Result

The postoperative serum glucose and cortisol levels were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the ERAS group. Serum glucose levels in the ERAS group were greater 6 h after surgery and right before (p < 0.001). Following surgery, the control group's serum cortisol levels were considerably higher (p < 0.001). Additionally, the ERAS group experienced fewer problems at discharge, including fever (p = 0.01), vomiting (p = 0.004), and nausea (p = 0.03), and had lower PONV intensity scores at 24 h (p = 0.012). Furthermore, the ERAS group started oral feedings sooner and spent a considerably lower amount of time in the hospital (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The modified ERAS protocol is beneficial in enhancing perioperative care and outcomes by reducing the surgical stress response and improving recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自印度北部的一项前瞻性观察研究:腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的应激反应、术后并发症和术后增强恢复(ERAS)与标准方案之间的比较
手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的目标是减少手术应激反应,促进更好的术后恢复。ERAS倡议的广泛采用导致了各种外科专业标准的扩展,特别是在结直肠手术中。在本研究中,接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者通过改良的ERAS程序评估围手术期应激反应、术后问题和康复情况。方法将120例患者纳入前瞻性观察研究,随机分为ERAS组(病例组)和标准治疗组(对照组)。ERAS手术的重要内容是多模式镇痛、碳水化合物负荷和术前教育。手术前后分别测定血清葡萄糖、皮质醇、总白细胞计数(TLC)和c反应蛋白(CRP)。结果术后血清葡萄糖、皮质醇水平明显降低(p <;ERAS组为0.001)。ERAS组患者术后6 h及术前血糖水平均高于对照组(p <;0.001)。手术后,对照组的血清皮质醇水平明显升高(p <;0.001)。此外,ERAS组在出院时出现的问题较少,包括发烧(p = 0.01)、呕吐(p = 0.004)和恶心(p = 0.03),并且24 h时PONV强度评分较低(p = 0.012)。此外,ERAS组开始口服喂养的时间更早,住院时间也更短(p <;0.001)。结论改进后的ERAS方案可减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的手术应激反应,提高围手术期护理水平和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
“Eyes wide open”: A consciousness-based cultural model for infection control in the operating room A study of preoperative triggers to prospectively identify cases at risk of adverse events in non-operating room anesthesia Does delirium cause postoperative pneumonia in patients after esophageal cancer surgery? Clinical and structural outcomes of hybrid operating rooms in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review Effects of bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes on recovery quality in patients undergoing lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1