Cross-Cultural Research in Eyewitness Identification: Exploring Criterion Differences Between South Korean and UK Eyewitnesses in Lineups

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Applied Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1002/acp.70050
Jungwon Lee, Renan Benigno Saraiva
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Research in Eyewitness Identification: Exploring Criterion Differences Between South Korean and UK Eyewitnesses in Lineups","authors":"Jungwon Lee,&nbsp;Renan Benigno Saraiva","doi":"10.1002/acp.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present study explored cultural differences in eyewitness identification across South Korea and the UK using a 2 (Country: South Korea vs. the UK) × 2 (target race: Asian &amp; White) × 2 (target presence: present &amp; absent) × 2 (lineup mode: simultaneous &amp; sequential) mixed design. The results showed no significant differences in decision criteria or identification accuracy between the two countries. The moderating effects of lineup mode or target race on accuracy were similar across both countries, but not on criteria. The lineup mode affected eyewitness accuracy in both countries, with simultaneous lineups leading to higher accuracy. However, decision criteria were influenced by lineup mode and target race in the UK, but not in South Korea. This implies that decision criteria may be more culturally sensitive than identification accuracy and raises concerns about generalizing findings from the eyewitness literature predominantly based on western samples to East Asian contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study explored cultural differences in eyewitness identification across South Korea and the UK using a 2 (Country: South Korea vs. the UK) × 2 (target race: Asian & White) × 2 (target presence: present & absent) × 2 (lineup mode: simultaneous & sequential) mixed design. The results showed no significant differences in decision criteria or identification accuracy between the two countries. The moderating effects of lineup mode or target race on accuracy were similar across both countries, but not on criteria. The lineup mode affected eyewitness accuracy in both countries, with simultaneous lineups leading to higher accuracy. However, decision criteria were influenced by lineup mode and target race in the UK, but not in South Korea. This implies that decision criteria may be more culturally sensitive than identification accuracy and raises concerns about generalizing findings from the eyewitness literature predominantly based on western samples to East Asian contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目击者辨认的跨文化研究:探讨韩国与英国证人指认标准的差异
本研究使用2(国家:韩国vs.英国)× 2(目标种族:亚洲人)来探讨韩国和英国目击者指认的文化差异。白色)× 2(目标存在:present &;缺席)× 2(列队方式:同时&;顺序)混合设计。结果显示,两国在决策标准或识别准确性方面没有显著差异。阵容模式或目标种族对准确性的调节作用在两国之间相似,但在标准上不同。在这两个国家,列队模式影响了目击者的准确性,同时列队导致更高的准确性。然而,在英国,决策标准受到阵容模式和目标种族的影响,而在韩国则没有。这意味着决策标准可能比识别准确性更具有文化敏感性,并引发了将主要基于西方样本的目击者文献的发现推广到东亚背景的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Applied Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Are Refugees Perceived as Criminals? Reducing the Memory Misinformation Effect in the Context of Stereotypes About Refugees Preschool-Level Predictors of Children's Executive Function: Do Preschool-Pedagogy Clusters Make a Difference? Motivated Reasoning at Work: Evaluating and Sharing Belief-Conflicting Information in the Context of Diversity Initiatives Speech Disfluencies and Implicit Word Learning: Fluency Shapes Preference, Not Performance Reinforced Self-Affirmation Method: Metamemory Monitoring and Control Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1