Toward Ethical Digital Practices: Guidelines for Consent, Accountability, and Transparency in Anthropology

IF 2 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.70044
Amber M. Plemons, Micayla C. Spiros
{"title":"Toward Ethical Digital Practices: Guidelines for Consent, Accountability, and Transparency in Anthropology","authors":"Amber M. Plemons,&nbsp;Micayla C. Spiros","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Digital tools and imaging are now common practice in biological anthropology research. Ethical concerns around the management, use, and display of digital human remains are a budding topic of discussion. Currently, there are no formalized discipline-wide guidelines or standards for digital ethics in biological anthropology. To bridge the gap between ethical standards and digital practices, we need to gauge current digital tools and resources used by professionals, as well as the state of ethical codes for professional organizations regarding digital media in biological anthropology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study reviews ethical statements from five professional organizations and survey responses from biological anthropologists on their use and opinions of digital remains. Text analyses were performed on ethics statements to identify terms related to digital remains and on survey responses to identify key themes in opinions of digital ethics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results demonstrated that only one organization mentions digital ethics while survey results indicate researchers are creating and using digital tools in their research. Thematic text analyses underline the need for consent, digital ethical guidelines, anonymity, data security, and cultural sensitivity and respect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlight the gap in practice and guidelines for digital ethics. We propose immediate action items, including the development of a cross-cultural, disciplinary working group to generate cohesive digital ethics standards, explicit statements on digital human remains in donor forms, the addition of digital best practice standards into organizations' ethics codes, and ethics statements added to current digital platforms. These proposed ethical guidelines and questions for donor forms are provided for these action items.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"186 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Digital tools and imaging are now common practice in biological anthropology research. Ethical concerns around the management, use, and display of digital human remains are a budding topic of discussion. Currently, there are no formalized discipline-wide guidelines or standards for digital ethics in biological anthropology. To bridge the gap between ethical standards and digital practices, we need to gauge current digital tools and resources used by professionals, as well as the state of ethical codes for professional organizations regarding digital media in biological anthropology.

Materials and Methods

This study reviews ethical statements from five professional organizations and survey responses from biological anthropologists on their use and opinions of digital remains. Text analyses were performed on ethics statements to identify terms related to digital remains and on survey responses to identify key themes in opinions of digital ethics.

Results

Results demonstrated that only one organization mentions digital ethics while survey results indicate researchers are creating and using digital tools in their research. Thematic text analyses underline the need for consent, digital ethical guidelines, anonymity, data security, and cultural sensitivity and respect.

Discussion

These results highlight the gap in practice and guidelines for digital ethics. We propose immediate action items, including the development of a cross-cultural, disciplinary working group to generate cohesive digital ethics standards, explicit statements on digital human remains in donor forms, the addition of digital best practice standards into organizations' ethics codes, and ethics statements added to current digital platforms. These proposed ethical guidelines and questions for donor forms are provided for these action items.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向道德数字实践:人类学同意、问责和透明度指南
数字工具和成像现在是生物人类学研究的普遍做法。关于数字人类遗骸的管理、使用和展示的伦理问题是一个新兴的讨论话题。目前,生物人类学的数字伦理还没有正式的学科范围的指导方针或标准。为了弥合道德标准和数字实践之间的差距,我们需要衡量专业人员使用的当前数字工具和资源,以及生物人类学中数字媒体专业组织的道德规范状况。材料和方法本研究回顾了五个专业组织的伦理声明,并调查了生物人类学家对数字遗骸的使用和意见的回应。对伦理声明进行文本分析,以确定与数字遗迹相关的术语,并对调查回复进行文本分析,以确定数字伦理意见中的关键主题。结果显示,只有一个组织提到了数字伦理,而调查结果表明,研究人员正在创建和使用数字工具在他们的研究中。专题文本分析强调了同意、数字道德准则、匿名、数据安全以及文化敏感性和尊重的必要性。这些结果凸显了数字伦理实践和指导方针的差距。我们建议立即采取行动,包括建立一个跨文化的纪律工作组,以制定有凝聚力的数字道德标准,明确声明捐赠形式的数字人体遗骸,将数字最佳实践标准添加到组织的道德准则中,以及在当前的数字平台中添加道德声明。这些建议的道德准则和捐助表格的问题是针对这些行动项目提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Estimated Lean Body Mass of Captive and Wild Orangutans. Ancient Mitochondrial Genomes Reveal the Maternal Diversity and Genetic Influence of the Qijia Culture in Prehistoric Eastern Asia. With Thanks. We Already Know a Bit About the Evolution of Love…. A New Experimental Protocol for Assessing Hominoid Assisted Arboreal Bipedalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1